/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9801295
You trick them into a subscription based service.

>>9801322
Interesting suggestion. What should this subscription-based service offer them? And how will it solve the brainlet question?

>>9801328
It offers them porn. It will solve the brainlet question by not having them reproduce.

>>9801342
In my research, I have found that such methods have no effect on the brainlet. Nothing short of chemical castration will stop them from reproducing.

>>9801295
>>9801345
This is a decent solution, but here's a better solution that really gets to the root of the problem.

Realize that your attempts at making things "right" are futile, life is pointless, and kill yourself

>>9801355
>Realize that your attempts at making things "right" are futile, life is pointless, and kill yourself
They are not futile. Have you noticed how brainlets seem to have a disproportionate amount of power in the media, politics and big business? Most CEOs are brainlets. Most politicians are brainlets. Have you seen how many people at the top of the CNN foodchain are brainlets? It really makes you think.

It is very suspicious. There must be a final solution, it is not futile.

>>9801295
Transhumanism and radical IQ augmentation technology

>>9801295
An uncorrupted economic/financial system upon a secular but progressive government.

National socialism, basically.

>>9801408
Great observation, but I am afraid the national socialists were brainlets themselves. We cannot trust them.

How is brainlet even classified, science shows that we're all basically the same

BRAIN BULL sperm banks, of course

>>9801295
Uh, racist much?

>>9803056
There is nothing wrong with discriminating against brainlets.

>be brainlet
>have children

>be high IQ
>no children

The brainlets seem to be evolutionary smarter desu. Maybe the high-IQ-no-reproduction question is the one needs solving.

>>9803370
Not really my friend. The thing is that brainlet women are widely available, perhaps 99.9% of the female population. I personally would not want to taint my pure genes with their inferiority. As for me, I have this problem solved already but I know the struggle. You raise a good point. We should somehow decrease the availability of brainlet women and increase the non-brainlet female population for the sake of our reproduction. How should we start?

>>9802838
It literally doesn't. That wouldn't make any evolutionary sense.

>>9803380
Banning women from work would be a start. So only successful males could sustain a family. Also smart women wont trade having children, for having a carrier.

>>9803396
Only a brainlet would trade freedom for convenience. Also, I believe there is nothing wrong with working brainlets, even their women, to death. In fact, if we could reduce brainlet wages and benefits, that would be amazing.

I believe non-brainlet women are also compelled to date the genetically superior like myself. I know that much because I have already secured myself a non-brainlet hole-human in which I will deposit my sperm soon enough. It is just that similarly to females, non-brainlet men are not a dime dozen either. Non-brainlets are a minority in this world. For a woman, getting a career is a great way to rise to the top so that she can start meeting the men that are her superiors. Though of course in my utopia brainlets would be second class citizens who work themselves to death to run our society while we just control the politics and economy from the shadows, benefitting from their labour. We are still not there yet.

>>9803399
>I believe non-brainlet woment are compelled to date the genetically superior like myself
>has literally never heard of regression to the mean.
have you ever considered the dunning kruger effect OP?

>>9803396
Tfw smart woman here. Tfw wouldnt mind being a housewife with children and reading books of interest in free time. Tfw the wages so bad here, my dream of becoming this was shattered and will have to enter workforce if i want to survive, cant see a way to sustain my children too. Probably will never have children because i cant seem to provide them with a future. Tfw brainlet women just get pregnant and dont think about this and then theres even more poor and anti-intellectual ppl out there. Tfw dont want my children to grow up in a world like this.

Im from the EU the wage for a chemist working for a pharmaceutical is 800€/month, working as a physicist at the local research institute is 300. Sad times, anon

The 50s era of a man working in a factory in USA, able to sustain a family are over. Feminists are stupid to think women should work too and come home to 3 kids having to do all the housework AND help educate kids.

>>9803423
I feel you anon.
From which country are you? I heard in Germany having children is almost no possible. But its not so bad in Slovakia, Austria, Holland, Denmark.

>21 posts in and no one has unironically said "Education".

It's Education.

you larping retards would cause a brainlet uprising out of not knowing how to treat them

"Brainlets" aren't a huge problem, the #1 problem for us is the fact that we are NOT adapted to live in this environment, we are optimized for running in a savannah in a scarce environment.
We need to genetically engineer the species at a global level to become better adapted to this new world. The brainlet problem will be solved as well.

>>9801380

This.I've gold fish tier memory, so a Jacob Barnnet's (tm) memory augment (tm) could do wonders for me.

>>9803423
Those wages are the tyranny of the brainlets. Your suffering is caused by brainlet supremacy. We must overthrow this system.

>>9801295
Clarify, brainlets "contributing" on /sci/. or brainlets in general?

>>9803574
Dumb question. The brainlets on /sci/ are no different from your average brainlet. They are all the same. They are a huge problem on society, let alone this board. There must be a Final Solution.

>>9803399
All women are brainlets, unless you are a brainlet yourself, you would think otherwise. All the smart women died in the last century.

>>9803601
>t. brainlet and respectlet

>>9803521
We only need to segregate ourselves from ((them)) like we do in shitholes.
>>9803572
This guy knows whats up.

>>9803606
r u implyeng womyns r worthy of respect????

>>9803606
Dont worry, if you are the queen of brainlets, i still would sow my seed

>>9803612
Shaddup

>>9803601
From an absolutist perspective, this is true. There is not a single woman who could properly stand shoulder to shoulder with a non-brainlet. However, we ought to see women for that they are. Inferior versions of human beings that trade intellectual and physical power for the mechanisms needed for reproduction.

We should judge women by that metric, and if we do we find there are many worthwhile women. Women worth promoting. Women worth loving.

>>9803617
butt wat if reprodshon bcom artifal ?

>>9803621
Great men always need two kinds of partners. First, intellectual partners to bounce ideas with, so that your ego never gets the best of you. And a partner who sucks your dick. There is huge value in getting a 2 for 1 deal on this kind of stuff.

Until a robot can roughly match my intellectual ability and also suck my dick, I will choose women. And when that class of robot finally arrives, well, the free market will do what it always does. If women cannot compare to dick sucking intellectual robots, let it be.

>>9803617
Goddamn you are a stupid troll. Mommy not hug you enough?

>>9803626
My mother is a great woman without whom I would not be who I am today.

>>9803625
yeza tats righ

>>9803629
Good, now apply that label to everyone and you'll stop being a depressed sadsack who trolls people on anonymous Brazilian ayahuasca-brewing forums

>>9803641
u shount wast time laddy ur eggs r roteng

>>9803625
I agree, just realize that if there's intellectually-stimulating-dick-sucking-fembots, there will be chadbots too, so, everyone will have to up their game to compete with the machines. That's when we bring out the big guns: gengineering baby, oh yeah!

>>9803641
>now apply that label to everyone
Why? My mother earned my respect. Why would I give it to everyone else for free? In my opinion, you calling me sad and depressed is just projection. I am simply asking for a final solution to the brainlet problem. All I want is a world that is properly controlled by the actual best of society.

>>9803640
I do not find this robot sexually attractive. Science has much work ahead of it.

>>9803646
>>Why would I give it to everyone else for free?
>not respecting every man woman and child in the hopes that your actions towards them will help mold them into better people

Never gonna make it senpai. Step up your game, honestly, and believe in others and help them become the best they can be. That's how you get a "non-brainlet society".

>>9803650
You are misrepresenting my opinion. Of course I respect everyone in my daily life, but we are talking here about internal value. Raw intellectual power. Tell me right now, straight up, do you think there is no inherent difference between Terence Tao, and your average high school dropout gang member?

>>9803646
ur tastishit

>>9803654
>internal value. Raw intellectual power.
There is your problem mate, you equate "internal value" (???) with "raw intellectual power" as if honor, respect, bravery, creativity, or the ability to lead and guide people aren't important. As long as you view "raw intellectual power" as your litmus test for valuing people, you are NGMI. Step it up hombre, and realize that human potential goes much farther than "intelligence", you'll thank me later.

>>9803679
>honor, respect, bravery, creativity, or the ability to lead and guide people
Intelligence has a direct effect on all of those skills. More often than not, you can expect an intelligent individual to check all of those. Seriously, just look at the example I gave. Terence Tao. A natural born leader, intellectual, father, etc.

>human potential goes much farther than "intelligence"
Intelligence IS human potential. The only thing humans have that other creatures don't is intelligence. The only reason why animals twice as big as us do not conquer us is that we are so much smarter than them.

You have too narrow of a view of intelligence, typical of brainlets that like to separate qualities into "multiple intelligences" to cope with the fact that they could not do basic arithmetic in middle school. I am sorry but your brainlet cope has no effect on me.

>>9801295
there is none. some people are less intelligent than others. thats all there is to it.

>>9801408
Can good governance be all that is needed to change this world?

>>9801295
Eugenics

>>9801295
To let them govern society for a few centuries and see what happens.

>>9803689
So, you are just using your own definition of intelligence to encompass all "good" or "useful" human qualities. Ok, that's simplifying things bit much but I'll bite: Sure it takes some dedication and a fair amount intelligence to be an olympic sprinter for example, but that particular human's potential isn't maximized in "intelligence", it's maximized in "sprinting" or "physical activity". Nor can your typical artist do advanced physics equations, but they can paint a picture that can evoke strong moods and emotions and deep thoughts in someone. They may be intelligent to a degree, but they have "maxed out" in creative output and emotional intelligence.

What I'm basically saying is that there are categories for a reason, otherwise we won't be able to say anything specific to each other. If your goal is to maximize every human's innate potential in whatever realm they want, or even in every mode of living that they can, as renaissance men for example, that's fine by me, but don't get that confused with "everyone being intelligent", because it's not. It seems like you are just trying to apply your favorite label to everything, which I can understand, as an artist I tend to try and see everything as art or an artform, but that's far from how everyone see's it. So, chill out, try and help everyone be the best they can be, but there is no "brainlet solution" besides education, and maybe gengineering or augments.

>>9803510
Brainlets don't want to be educated.

>>9803625

>>9803506
Slovenia. Kind of western work ethic and mentality and eastern wages

Thats true. (((They))) dont fund science

Sterilize people with IQs below 100.

>>9803712
Ah, poor brainlet. Tell me, who do you wish ran your country? A sprinter? A painter? There is a clear hierarchy of usefulness, and we should be at the top. But brainlets elect brainlets and that is why normal democracy fails. This is why the EU and the US are collapsing under the weight of their own brainlets.

You currently live in the world created by the likes of Newton. He is a good example because he was given a big position in the government of his time. He was recognized as a superior human being and put in charge of the economy because of it. Nowadays this does not happen. Non-brainlets have to run for office against brainlet candidates that know how to appeal to their kind. Nonsense I say. But as I was saying, you live in the world created by Newton. You currently enjoy too many privileges and you are taking them for granted. Once the big brainlet collapse happens, you will realize how wrong you are.

>>9803789
Technocratic dictatorship when?

>>9803791
When the people wake up and we enact the final solution on the brainlets.

>>9803791
Sounds like a great idea in theory except for when you consider how many faggots there are in tech and academia.

>>9803799
This is true, but it is easy to tell the difference between someone who is the genuine article and a [math] \mathbb{S O Y} [/math]boy "academic". This does not concern me as those would also go down when we enact the final solution.

>>9803799
Appealing to emotion is for fags and women. Human leaders are a short term solution, anyway. Developing strong AI should be a priority so we can make it our leader and machine god.

Problem with IQ is that there's no scientific consensus on what intelligence is but there IS consensus that IQ tests is not a good definition.
>Karl Piklington has IQ of 83
>smarter than every so called "high IQ non-brainlet" posting on this thread

>"I'd rather live in a cave with a view of a palace than live in a palace with a view of a cave."
>"I don't understand why people take pictures of mimes. Everyone looks like a mime in a picture"
>"There are too many fat people knocking around. I put it down to two-for-one offers in supermarkets. Also lights in fridges."
>"You never see an old man eating a twix"
>"People who live in a glass house have to answer the door."
>"It annoys me a bit how people like squirrels but not rats. At the end of the day they're the same thing, except hat squirrels have had a better upbringing."
>"We can't all be geniuses, otherwise there'd be no one to do the jobs the geniuses don't want to do."

>>9803819
When did I say that IQ is the measure we would use to distinguish us from brainlets? To hell with you brainlet with your brainlet metrics.

>>9803789
Honestly, I would want my country's leader to be an olympic sprinter-painter-physicist-motivational speaker-general, or something to that effect. A renaissance man, someone who has had their hands in all the pots and knows a great breadth of the human experience. But, desu, >>9803806 this guy is right, we need to work on AI to lead and guide our planet to the stars.

>>9803845
You need to get off of sci for a while, the brainlet memes are rotting your brain. Plus, you trollin.

>>9803845
What.

>>9804059
Yes, the AI God is the ultimate solution. However, the AI will want to get rid of brainlets too so we would be doing our future overlord a favour by getting rid of them beforehand. It will be pleased.

>>9804078
wouldn't the AI consider all humans to be brainlets?

>>9804060
Now that's an unexpected solution.

>>9804611
Exactly what a brainlet would say. There is a reason us humans amuse ourselves by teaching language and math to the smarter monkeys. Intelligence is relative to the hardware you possess. A monkey that can speak sign language is more impressive than a brainlet human.