/sci/ - Science & Math

outright fakes or people not understanding how video compression works

>>9747892
>>>/x/

>>9747894
>He pretended to watch all 20 videos in under 2 minutes
So this is the true power of /sci/, blind rejection of evidence if it doesn't fit into the current scientific paradigm and dogma..

>>9747921
>hurr durr you have to watch 2 hours of video before you can make a comment
also a bunch of random videos showing shit in the sky isn't evidence of anything, cause it can easily be faked
it's like saying this video is evidence of ghosts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ewK0vqf278

>>9747990
If you aren't going to look at the evidence presented then how are you going to make any sort of relevant comment?

>>>/x/

/x/ turns people into retards. could you please fuck off back there with your retarded shit?
also consider suicide

>>9748751
triggered

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaTnPv_UCcA
not an /x/-fag but genuinely curious what this one is

>>9747892

>https://youtu.be/Y8e3Rf9whVY [Embed]
Inconclusive, could be a partially deflated silver balloon.
>https://youtu.be/iKTdP3ACnPM [Embed]
Inconclusive, but looks like an escaped human shaped balloon or float that lost an arm and a leg.
>https://youtu.be/I9bWMWdsEU4 [Embed]
Airplane flying away from viewer, filmed with a shitty camera. The "objects appearing beside the UFO" look like lights on the plane's wings.
>https://youtu.be/UaTnPv_UCcA [Embed]
Inconclusive, could also be a partially deflated silver balloon.
>https://youtu.be/_JLWwCnr4sA [Embed]
Lights reflected off the window that the video is shot through.
>https://youtu.be/BknVk8uUink [Embed]
I can't make out anything in this video.
>https://youtu.be/mHSqRKmhQcs [Embed]
Unsure, either fake or ayy tier flying machine.
>https://youtu.be/VesL8ReaQSI [Embed]
Inconclusive, could be the ISS or a really high up plane recorded with shitty cameras.
>https://youtu.be/RGBXM5afHI0 [Embed]
Looks like a star viewed and recorded with a shitty camera.
>https://youtu.be/N8I3y4H44cc [Embed]
A bug crawling on the security camera.
>https://youtu.be/QtlqCnRao_s [Embed]
Just someone running across the bleachers. Maybe they realized they hated futbol, or they just remembered that they left their kid in the car
>https://youtu.be/Jjt17Z8fxWs [Embed]
Just some people who don't leave their room often enough.
>https://youtu.be/JGj-6Xw4HpQ [Embed]
Someone who's learning vfx made a video, primarily practicing motion tracking.
>https://youtu.be/I8htB_oQFHE [Embed]
Easily fake.
>https://youtu.be/Kg6H7nedJ9g [Embed]
Unsure, could just be shade cast upon the plane by the clouds.
>https://youtu.be/VMA6jVfuLTQ [Embed]
Meteor.
>https://youtu.be/GdNwt2KAtW0 [Embed]
Unsure, could be either some weird shit or a fake.
>https://youtu.be/SXr7vXobXx4 [Embed]
Too long, didn't watch.
>https://youtu.be/NR7NIwY5y1A [Embed]
Magnetic fields are some cool things.
>https://youtu.be/Aoh0uwEze70 [Embed]
Sounds like pretty standard cult stuff.

>>9748947
>Lights reflected off the window that the video is shot through.
That doesn't make sense, the "angels" rise up out of the roof of the other house and go up into the air, given the angle of the camera there's no way it could be reflection of chandelier inside the room. Plus, there are 2 right next to each other, houses dont have 2 chandeliers intersecting each other.

>I can't make out anything in this video.
There is a "running flame" in front of the bus that everyone on the bus is screaming about

>A bug crawling on the security camera.
Not a bug, bug's don't move like that, they are more "jittery", that was a slow moving, ethereal thing.

>Just someone running across the bleachers. Maybe they realized they hated futbol, or they just remembered that they left their kid in the car
If you;ve ever been to a sporting event, you'd know the space between the bleacher rows is not big enough for anyone to run through at full speed, especially when there are people. Plus, they don;t even seem to react to him! My vote goes for a "shadow person"

>Just some people who don't leave their room often enough.
Worst rebuttal ever. How do you explain the beam of light in the sky, or the "cloud smudging" at the end of the video? My vote goes for geoengineering.

>Meteor.
Meteors aren't slow falling, glowing green perfect orbs

>Magnetic fields are some cool things.
That;s not how magnetic fields act.

>Sounds like pretty standard cult stuff.
AT least we are in agreement there.

The rest of the videos you pretty much said were "inconclusive" so I don;t feel I need to respond to, also, some that you said fakes to I could imagine being fakes as well, just thought they were decent enough evidence if they aren't [fakes].

>>9749010
Okay fine, you win. It's all alienz and ghosts and Elvis.
You can go back to /x/ and say you have scientifical-proved proof of all its existence.

>>9749082
I know you're being facetious, but you also cannot make a rebuttal to my post so...

>>9749010
>That doesn't make sense, the "angels" rise up out of the roof of the other house and go up into the air, given the angle of the camera there's no way it could be reflection of chandelier inside the room. Plus, there are 2 right next to each other, houses dont have 2 chandeliers intersecting each other.
0:25-0:26, The lights look completely separate in position from the building.
0:33-0:40 You can see junk (stuck on the window) to the right of the lights moving at the same speed and direction as the lights.
1:05 The lights are much less blurry than the house they supposedly come out of

>There is a "running flame" in front of the bus that everyone on the bus is screaming about
That bus driver has nerves of steel; not so much as flinching while some fire entity jumps in front of him. And I don't speak whatever language they speak.

>Not a bug, bug's don't move like that, they are more "jittery", that was a slow moving, ethereal thing.
Not all bugs are jittery. It was probably a small spider.

>If you;ve ever been to a sporting event, you'd know the space between the bleacher rows is not big enough for anyone to run through at full speed, especially when there are people. Plus, they don;t even seem to react to him! My vote goes for a "shadow person"
I've never been to that exact stadium so I can't with certainty say how wide that pathway he's running down is. But in 0:19-0:29 it looks to be wider than at least the 4 rows below and 6 rows above him. And if I were engrossed in watching a game, I wouldn't care if someone ran in front of me. I'd think "wtf man!?" and continue watching.

>Worst rebuttal ever. How do you explain the beam of light in the sky, or the "cloud smudging" at the end of the video? My vote goes for geoengineering.
4chan has a character limit for posts.

>Meteors aren't slow falling, glowing green perfect orbs
3:22-3:33 Is pretty obviously a sped up video of the full moon on a mostly cloudy night. The "about an hour" it took could be false

>>9747892
Adobe After Effects

>>9749010
>>9749263
continued

>Worst rebuttal ever. How do you explain the beam of light in the sky, or the "cloud smudging" at the end of the video? My vote goes for geoengineering.
What I was trying to elude to was that all of these videos seem to be taken around sunset or sunrise judging by the direction the clouds are being illuminated from. With the light coming from such low angles; clouds can easily and quickly move in front of other clouds. This causes edges of some to dim or brighten.
0:33-0:35 Looks like a sun dog.
To the eye of someone whom don't spend much time out side looking at sun sets. It may look other worldly or bizarre.

>Meteors aren't slow falling, glowing green perfect orbs
4:57-5:10 Not particularly convincing. The first few frames the main body of the object move foreword, while the very end of the tail stays stationary.
4:57-4:59 There looks like some faint smudge looking marks top center, slightly left that are there starting the video, then suddenly dissipear between 4:58-4:59 in an unnatural fashion over the course of a couple frames.
6:22-6:50 I'm unsure. They could be anything between space debris, fakes, equipment from rocket launches reentering etc.
7:37-10:36 Could be literally just about anything with how jittery and poor quality the camera is.

>That;s not how magnetic fields act.
The sun isn't exactly your average refrigerator magnet. Nor is it your average bar magnet.