/sci/ - Science & Math

> If I gave an object enough energy, would it have enough energy?

Of course.
There are still a few problems you may want to care about though:
It doesn't have tanks to store all that fuel, not to mention its circuitry wasn't build to operate above van allen belts, so everything would just stop working.

>>9745357
Just put a plastic bag in the sleeping quarters and observation deck and attach it with a hose to the thrusters

>>9744938
yes, it wouldn't even be difficult

getting to orbit takes a fuck ton more energy than leaving it.

The thrusters need to have enough impulse. An infinite amount of fuel and a cigarette lighter wouldn't get the job done.

Wait, you actually think the ISS is real?

>>9745428
but
It would be extremely painful

>>9745530
>Niggers thinking some artifacting means space is faked


On a side note, I miss the days where "nigger" still meant "utmost dumb fag" and not literally 'negro', it was a more useful term in these kinds of situations

>>9745547
The first artifacting clip shows the green screen. Also, fading isn't artifacting, get some better eyes.

>>9745551
hope you're trolling
that or you're an utter fucking moron for thinking some video compression artifacts somehow prove something

>>9745564
It's not just artifacts moron.

>>9745551
No it doesn't you mother fucking nigger
The first artifact shows the negative image of his shirt, where his arm crosses over it and causes the artifact to begin with.
The fading is indeed a kind of artifacting, where the image of his arm lingers on the screen once he's passed. They even made a neat filter out of this back in 2005 on my fucking Logitech webcam that could make you look like a ghost.

You get some better eyes

>>9745568
What the hell are you trying to prove here?

>>9745568
just look at their clothes how they stay up you fucking retard, have you ever seen clothes on people how they look here on earth?
>hurr greenscreen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvTmdIhYnes
kill yourself you waste of a brain

>>9745570
Shut up NASA Nut Hugger, you seriously think they had some faggy ghost effect on the webcam that only works when you leave the frame? Take your meds.

>>9745575
What do you think brainlet?

>>9745581
Dumb shit baby. Do you believe in the tooth fairy as well?

>>9745586
>>9745588
conspiracy nuts get the fuck out of /sci/
retarded morons can't see the clothes or hair how they stand up, harness my ass, you retards just see whatever you want

>>9745593
explain how the sleeve and clothes stay up if they're down here on earth with harnesses?
or shut the fuck up with this retardation

>>9745594
Quiet brainlet, the adults are talking.

>>9745593
lol he clearly grabs his pants.
you really dont need that much strength to handle weightless objects so you can do it with your little pinky.

>>9745595
Stop deflecting pussy.

>>9745593
Some people are not ready for the red pill. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpKUBHz6MB4

>>9745600
Delusional.

>>9745586
Have you ever fother mucking spun in a rolly chair?
You would know that the slightest moderate body movement can get you going

>>9745605
No u stop deflecting, that's a much stronger argument than anything you've shown

A further question, how do they get the muh harnesses to not be seen?


>>9745612
>A single speck of something falls across the screen
WOAH GUYS, woah here, just WOW
space = debunked
It would be more convincing of it even happened at regular intervals, indicating like a leak or something

>>9745530
Do you know how video works?

Also this can NOT possibly be the greenscreen, it makes no logical sense, since obviously greenscreening would have coloured that artifact correctly...

>>9745609
Pathetic, really.

>>9745626
Kek, her face tells a different story.

>>9745626
>A further question, how do they get the muh harnesses to not be seen?
It's called real time CGI. Amazing what you can do with billions of dollars, they're still not perfect though.

>space = debunked
Correct, you're finally making some sense.

>>9745633
>it makes no logical sense
I'm not going to take logic lessons from someone who believes in space, how utterly arrogant.

>>9745638
>Pathetic, really.
Reading comprehension problems? I was referring to how people cannot and don't want to believe in the NASA hoaxes. It is one of the ultimate red pills. Yes, it is genuine NASA fraud which is self-evident in the videos. NASA bloopers involving green screen tech, harnesses, and augmented reality are nothing to laugh at.

>>9745638
>her face
No
It seems you only notice these kinds of things if you are looking for them with an agenda, I didn't see anything particularly odd

>realtime CGI
oof
I hoped you wouldn't come to this one, but you did
You keep referencing these shitty like 480p videos and then zooming in to strange little artifacts in the corners or other things you can't believe, but you haven't gone into the much better videos like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhGydridbEA
the long form ones with real moving camerawork, wider angles, many parts of the station shown, many difference movements across many directions which would be a masterwork of ""harnessing""
And yet all of these hurdles can be wiped away by you in an instant by claiming 'buh muh real-time CGI'

>>9745643
Here you didn't address his argument of how a greenscreen would have colored the artifact correctly


Lastly, you still have not given a reason why their clothes and sleeves might stand up as they do

>>9745521
That's not true at all, once you're in orbit you can go anywhere with enough delta v.

>>9745650
It's pathetic people are willing to defend the obvious fraud.

>>9745659
>I didn't see anything particularly odd
Autism confirmed.

>You keep referencing these shitty like 480p videos and then zooming in to strange little artifacts in the corners or other things you can't believe, but you haven't gone into the much better videos like this one:
Oh what, the non-live ones? The ones they can spend years perfecting with billions of dollars coming in every year? No thanks.

>Here you didn't address his argument of how a greenscreen would have colored the artifact correctly
It's the least of your concerns.

>>9745643
mini-mind

>>9745551
>green screen
Why would they need a green screen when a 1:1 scale model already exists on Earth? Wouldn't they just film it there?

>>9745679
They at least use blue screens for augmented reality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBeQ9h9AdYY

>>9745643
Just because NASA is obviously faking space missions, it doesn't mean they are all faked. Nor does it mean we can't travel through space or it's somehow related to Earth's shape. Logic..use it.

There is a scene in the movie 'Interstellar' that claims bankrupting Russia was the main motive for the fake moon mission. I believe that is the best explanation. Space is too expensive. You need dedicated maintenance teams to maintain the average submarine. A spaceship should be no different.

>>9745709
>Just because NASA is obviously faking space missions, it doesn't mean they are all faked.
Kek, name a real one please.

>>9745675
>least of your concerns.
It's not the least of my concerns, it's your MAIN argument for why there might be a greenscreen, 'becuz is's green'

>non-live ones
my boi, you keep throwing this out to "them", for "them to do it,
but even with tons of money you have to do all of the things I mentioned, all the masterful camerawork and yada yada, which are indeed nearly impossible merely with harnessing and CGI with real actors altogether, but then you also have to pump out these videos all the damn time, nearly at feature-presentation lengths
Here are a few, all within the last 3 years:
https://youtu.be/QvTmdIhYnes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COuMhK5q_nA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8GCYvLtQ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkYz43qALMU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGP6Y0Pnhe4

And check out this shit with the ACTUAL mock up of the station on Earth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY1jYYhpGJM

Theoretically you could compare this one, that is known to be on Earth, to the one in the videos, and determine what must be 'faked'
But you guys don't even go that far
You niggers just stick to pointing out little shit in the videos that could be used either way in proving what you wanted to be true
I mean what about Occam's razor for fuck's sake?

>>9745530

It's real.

You can track it with amateur radio stuff.

>>9745547
Why not just say “retard” or “dumb faggot”. Your ironic usage of nigger contributed to its current use.

>>9745726
Not to mention that I've seen the damn thing with my own eyes through my own telescope

>>9745720
>Kek, name a real one please.

Even if all missions were faked, that still wouldn't mean Earth is flat or space doesn't exist.

It could be a matter of finances and technical limitations. We know space travel would require maintenance teams and onsite metal fabrication labs just like a military submarine. Those two factors alone would make it cost prohibitive. Then. there are the technical limitations of rockets sending up what is essentially heavy submarines to space. Another technical limitation would be the deadly radioactive Van Allen belts.

>>9745726
>It's not the least of my concerns, it's your MAIN argument for why there might be a greenscreen, 'becuz is's green'
It's clearly fake, you have an autistic obsession with a minor point in a sea of fuckery.

>but even with tons of money you have to do all of the things I mentioned, all the masterful camerawork and yada yada, which are indeed nearly impossible merely with harnessing and CGI with real actors altogether,
You don't know what technology they have, they could be using diamagnetism for all we know.

>You niggers just stick to pointing out little shit in the videos that could be used either way in proving what you wanted to be true
Shouldn't exist in the first place spacecuck.

>>9745744
>it's clearly fake because i say so
retarded, just because you hate nasa with a psychotic autism doesn't mean anything moron
>muh secret alien tech
just kill yourself

>>9745737
Both retard and dumb and faggot don't have the same bite as nigger does, likely because it's the only real "bad word" nowadays
I think it was just the inflowing of /pol/ who abused the word and started also disparaging black people in general on this site with sundry threads about "whiteness" that made the current situation

>>9745729
Oh cool radio waves it must be real.

>>9745744
>It's clearly fake, you have an autistic obsession with a minor point in a sea of fuckery.
C'mon dude, defend your point you spineless cunt
YOU see a sea of fuckery, I do not, therefore it is up to you to prove it
You made a claim that there is a greenscreen, I and the other anon presented evidence suggesting against it, and now you're just backing away since it seems you can't defend your claim

>>9745749
There is nothing more stubborn than a brainwashed autist.

>>9745757
i know, i'm talking to one
refute his arguments or make arguments and there's secret alien tech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8TssbmY-GM
>oh noo, there he's in a vomit comet
then why is there no turbulence? any plane flying in the atmosphere would have turbulence whatever secret tech you use

>>9745754
Is that the only contention you have? You don't think broadcasting green screen video can't glitch?

>>9745768
You don't think broadcasting regular video can't glitch?

>>9745765
Is David Copperfield in space? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70U2yybKhKg

>>9745754
By the looks of this video, NASA uses blue screen technology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CvRUO-pVvo

>>9745778
You can clearly see from his clothes that they're being pulled down by gravity, now look at any ISS video and pay attention to their clothes and accessories.

>>9745786
>n clearly see from his clothes that they're being pulled down by gravity, now look at any ISS video and pay attention to their clothes and

With the most recent technology they are now using augmented reality where fake objects can be manipulated in real-time. They are getting better at their fraud. NASA is a fraud but the Earth is still round. : P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfBUIZcBDz8

>>9745795
Why again do they need to do this?
Especially if the Earth is round and they don't need to cover up a flat Earth conspiracy

>>9745795
>muh secret alien tech
so you have no argument, yeah, okay
in all the videos you keep shilling you can see from the wrinkles on their clothes that they're in 0g
fucking morons

>>9745802
>ing you can see from the wrinkles on their clothes that they're

My point was,..clothing can also be a part of augmented reality. Sooner or later we will not be able to tell the difference until they screw up.

>>9745801
>if the Earth is round and they don't need to cover up a flat Earth conspiracy

Flat Earth was invented to distract, deceive and degrade the discussion regarding genuine NASA fraud. Basic Cointel tactics. The video bloopers speak for themselves.

>>9745813
yeah, sure, you keep on listening to that song and watching flattard videos though so you can keep reinforcing your retarded delusions

>>9744938
Yes but its designed to be in LEO because there its protected from radiation by the magnetosphere, it would need much robust shielding to become say... a L4 station

>>9745819
NASA hoaxes are real. Flat Earth is a disinfo campaign built to hide the truth. The Earth is obviously round.

With enough fuel, we could have a full blown gay space communist Utopia. The problem, is that we don't have enough fuel.

>>9745818
>Flat Earth was invented to distract, deceive and degrade the discussion regarding genuine NASA fraud.
Who invented it?

>>9745833
Who benefits the most?

>>9745846
You tell me.

>>9745854
I don't know everything but I do know that flat earth is bullshit and reasonable people don't want any part of it which unfortunately stifles debate (the intended consequence).

>>9745854
Flat Earth is like the retarded kid that takes a dump on the dining table where adults are conversing.

>>9745864
So they can fake space travel but they can't fake the shape of the earth?

>>9745877
I guarantee you that every retarded kid that has shat on a dining table were also globecucks.

>>9745893
>So they can fake space travel but they can't fake the shape of the earth?

hahaha picture debunks your flat earth bullshit. Great job at degrading the discussion.

>>9745893
never seen any reasonable response to this image from flattards, except
>muh magic magnetic field does something, fucking magnets man how do they work

>>9745905
>Doesn't understand how a local light source moving over a flat surface works

>Doesn't understand how light gets less and less visible the more atmosphere it passes through

>>9745913
What don't you understand about magnetic poles?

>>9745931
what pole on a flat earth?

>>9745936
There's the northern magnetic "pole", and the southern magnetic "pole", that can easily exist on a flat plane.

>>9745956
>that can easily exist on a flat plane
show me

>>9745971
You've just posted an example.

>>9745978
no, that's a normal magnet
also stars have nothing to do with the magnetic field, if you're trying to imply that they do you'll have to show some evidence for it

>>9745983
The northern hemisplane's dominant magnetic force is the northern magnetic pole, and the southern is the southern magnetic pole, it's very simple. Their differing rotations explain the Coriolis effect. They are opposites to each other just as the north/south magnetic poles are the opposites, opposite rotations, opposite sides to each other, and opposite centres, one has a pole star, the other does not.

>>9745999
again, magnetic fields have fuck all to do with the light coming from stars, learn some actual physics instead of your handwave shit

>>9746011
If it isn't the earth that is rotating, then it must be the stars, therefore this false rotation being the cause of the Coriolis effect or the magnetic field should be linked with that which is also rotating, that being the sun, moon and other celestial "bodies".

>>9746017
>If it isn't the earth that is rotating
well if you start from a retarded assumption you get retarded answers
the fucking Greeks thousands of years ago knew more than your moronic fish brain

>>9746024
The Greeks were retarded for believing that and so are you.

>>9746033
yeah man, you're the only one who knows the truth, no scientist or other humans in history cared to investigate or think about it, you're the one
fucking narcissistic moronic douche

>>9746044
You think I think I'm the only one who knows the earth is flat? You've run out of arguments.

>>9746050
your retarded cult is filled with morons without a clue of physics or science, and is also a new cancer on the world

>>9746058
Spoken like a true globe cultist.

>>9744938
with enough fuel, could i get her on my bed and slowly caress her over that one piece swimsuit as we make out and things follow their natural course?

It couldn’t leave orbit it would just hit the firmament

>>9744962
I mean could we realistically give it enough fuel? Alsobcould we do it over multiple sessions, refueling at higher orbits?

>>9744938
The correct answer is, "no". It doesn't currently have the equipment to do that. With the correct equipment and enough fuel, yes.

>>9745669
pic for you

>>9745696
How much crack do you smoke each day?

>>9745530
You dropped this

>>9745744
>diamagnetism
Kek is that related to the Vortex Math from the other thread?

>>9746017
>should be linked
How?
Your model is not scientifically valid until you can describe this link in such a way as to allow it to be used to predict observed phenomenae. Currently, it cannot do that and can therefore be safely assumed to be bullshit.

>>9746693
toppest kek

>>9744938
>if we wanted
What do you mean by "we", Peasant?

>>9745609
>the red pill
GTFO, pill-popping /pol/esmoker

>>9745612

>drop moves at a constant velocity
>not accelerating like it would on earth

hmmmmmmmmmm

>>9745928

Try that with a solar filter, retard

>>9745753
You believe nasa has the tech to make radio waves just spontaneously appear from space, but not that they can lug some modules into the air?

>>9745530
You fucking retard, you can see it with a decent pair of binoculars, let alone a decent telescope.

At least flat earth morons need to do basic maths to be easily disproven you just need to fucking look.

>>9746794
You dropped your gay card loser.

>>9746805
Diamagnetic levitation, webm related.

>>9746820
Foucault pendulums use a magnetic tip, and stop working during a solar eclipse, is that not evidence?

>>9747403
Depends on the material doesn't it? Do feathers accelerate?

>>9747407
It would get smaller retard.

>>9747738
Why would they need to do that? Shooting radio waves across a flat plane isn't hard.

>You fucking retard, you can see it with a decent pair of binoculars, let alone a decent telescope.
It's a hologram brainlet, there's no one in that thing.

>>9744938
I was reading about methods for defeating asteroid impacts, and in the case of late detection, one of the better plans for dealing with particularly large ones is to send up booster rockets (presumably on other rockets), attach them to the ISS, and send the ISS at said threatening asteroid as fast as possible, turning it into a kinetic bomb.

Seems the link is dead, but it had the math and cost analysis (never quite understood why end-of-the-world scenarios have cost analysis, but yeah.) Would be inevitably more effective than taking all the world's nuclear warheads and sticking them on said asteroid.

So yeah, seems it could be done, assuming you don't care if the ISS survives the trip.

(Still a shit way to phrase the question though.)

>>9745575
How easily trolled this place has become.

>>9745643
Those shirts seem to make a problem for your green-screen theory.

>>9745931
I don't understand how magnets can make it possible to look at the same point in the sky by looking in 180 degrees the other direction, depending on where you stand. That seems beyond the power of a magnetic field.

Perhaps you can expand it, without resorting to hand-waving irrelevancies, goalpost shifting, or just saying "magnets" repeatedly.