[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 19 KB, 258x387, Origin_(Dan_Brown_novel_cover).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9724791 No.9724791 [Reply] [Original]

"Where did we come from?"
-Big Bang

"Where are we going?"
-Heat death

Am I right?

>> No.9725452

Probably we're going to freeze not burn

>> No.9726681

>>9724791
The terms "we" and "come from" are virtual. You are a brainlet.

>> No.9726699

>>9724791
>“Where did we come from?”
A vagina
>”Where are we going?”
I’m going to work in a bit idk about y’all

>> No.9727327

You probably come from a gang bang

>> No.9727415

>>9726681
math is virtual, but that doesn't mean it isn't useful.

>> No.9728644
File: 120 KB, 580x580, Pythagoras.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728644

>>9727415
math is not virtual dumbass, they are the only ting that is reality

>> No.9728646

>>9724791

nah, heat death is just one of the possible eng game scenarios for the universe, and the big bang is NOT about universal origins. It's about what happened after our local representation of spacetime has been around for about 1 planck time.

>> No.9728648
File: 664 KB, 1918x1842, WhatIsReality.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728648

>>9728646
space time does not exist Einstein was a fraud Tesla was right there is only the aether.

>> No.9728654

This guy is a fucking joke and you should not read it (btw, I'm not criticizing without having read anything from him: 3+ book read).
He's basically a brainlet scamming brainlets as any character of Eco's Focault's Pendulum

>> No.9728656

>>9728646
Even Planck knew this btw >>9728648

>> No.9728658

>>9728654
I haven't read it but I have all his other books and he is no fraud, at least not on the topics he wrote on previously. They weer of course truth disguised as fiction with some liberty. I have no idea what this book is about however or his knowledge on science

>> No.9728669

>>9728648

to sad for tesla then that real scientists have been able to demonstrate space and time to be actual entities, aether to not exist.

>> No.9728672
File: 70 KB, 720x434, TeslasBrain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728672

>>9728669
ROFL sure thing. Keep believing (((theories))). Ever hear of a thing called the double slit experiment? I guess you you haven't or you don't understand it. Also the Universe is electric, this has been proven in a lab it is not a (((theory))) and Tesla is never wrong

>> No.9728674
File: 8 KB, 300x168, Luminefious.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728674

>>9728669
"real scientists" FUCKING

L
O
L

You mean people that intervened nothing and created nothing? You don't even understand science, I don't think anyone should care about your opinion on what a "real scientist" is.

>> No.9728676

>>9728658
Well, Dan Brown writes fiction on fictional theories with some true basis.
I bet if I'll trough 1 Poe's novel, 2 essays on medieval age and 1 paper from Elsevier of your choice in a Markov chain text generator I'll probably come up with a better novel than what he wrote.

About Focault's Pendulum: it's a novel on how 3 guys and a computer deliberately re-write Templar's story up to 1980s

>> No.9728681
File: 26 KB, 258x385, inferno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728681

>>9728676
this is not fiction

>> No.9728682
File: 65 KB, 720x682, flouride2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728682

>>9728676
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/03/health/united-states-fertility-rate.html

>> No.9728683
File: 55 KB, 781x691, autism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728683

>>9728676
and neither was angels and demons for the most part

>> No.9728684
File: 299 KB, 422x414, 1523157287823.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728684

the big bang is a model of how things progress. we didn't come from it. do you say we came from space expansion? no? then shut up.

>> No.9728686
File: 37 KB, 850x400, bernay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9728686

>>9728676
or digital fortress ever hear of Vault7?

(((Barnays)))
The Fluoride Deception (2004) by Christopher Bryson
p xxii “He [Edward L. Bernays] also promoted water fluoridation, consulting on strategy for the National Institute of Dental Research.”
p 159 “Selling fluoride was child’s play, Bernays explained [in a 1993 interview]. The PR wizard specialized in promoting new ideas and products to the public by stressing a claimed public-health benefit. He understood that citizens had an often unconscious trust in medical authority. ‘You can get practically any idea accepted,’ Bernays told me, chuckling. ‘If doctors are in favor, the public is willing to accept it, because a doctor is an authority to most people, regardless of how much he knows, or doesn’t know.…By the law of averages, you can usually find an individual in any field who will be willing to accept new ideas, and the new ideas then infiltrate the others who haven’t accepted it.”

>> No.9728693

>>9728681
>>9728682
>>9728683
>>9728686
All right, all right, calm down you all.
I know, it's my fault, I keep forgetting I am on 4chan regardless of the board

>> No.9728702

>>9728693
You have bad cognitive dissonance and a problem deniying of reality /sci/ is not the board for you I don't think

>> No.9728703

>>9728693
If you cannot look at evidence to determine what is real and true, cause and effect, you are not someone that should be into science.

>> No.9728713

>>9728693
I imagine you think the holohoax really happened as well and the in the ebil Nazis meme
http://www.renegadetribune.com/occult-significance-number-6/

>> No.9728764

>>9728702
Yes, it's called scepticism, and it's at the base of research, and well, there is no such thing as absolute empirical evidence - applied maths focus on that.

>>9728703
Again, correlation does not mean causation, and cause and effect are only relative to your point of observation. If you base your observations on one evidence (or an opinion) well, you can prove pretty much anything. It's like prior beliefs without any data supporting them paroplopop toop toop research is getting crowded and we need fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunds (and attention)

>>9728713
Why am I even wasting my time?
Oh yes, recreational purposes.

>> No.9728910

>>9728764
you are confusing stupidity with "skepticism" they are not the same thing.

>> No.9728955

>>9728764
I bet you think rich people pay all their taxes too and they donate money to politicians with no strings attached. I bet you you never heard of shadow corporations, fronts or subsidiaries, or if you have never considered countries could possibly be run the same way! I bet you didn't even know countries are in fact corporations. And to close I bet you are "skeptical" enough to think your vote counts because you vote between 5 different candidates and are given the illusion of choice but never ask who selected those 5 candidates.

You are very gullible and not real capable of thinking in one more dimension apparently.

>I keep forgetting I am on 4chan regardless of the board
If people keep telling you the same thing, perhaps it is because they were smart enough to look into it and find the truth and know what they are talking and you should probably do the same don't you think? Nah your skepticism is only for anything the (((system))) doesn't sit in your lap and tell you not to be skeptical of like a good goy. Well you did it, you are a very good goy, good job