/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9708966
bump

>>9708966
It's a copy and paste of a spatial intelligence test from a real IQ test. So it's probably quite accurate.

am I a real brainlet?

>>9709281
Yes. I scored 124 and I'm dumb as fuck.

>>9709290
iq is a fucking meme anyway. something losers who havent achieved anything use to brag about

>>9708966
Pretty accurate. IQ test validity decays about 0.3 points per year due to the Flynn effect though (it overestimates by that much), so when the test was normed is important.

>>9708966
I'm still curious of how actually intelligent people do on this. /sci/ is full of mathematicians and scientists isn't it?

I took it seriously and got 135. Then I just clicked around randomly and got 97. I remember taking something almost identical a few months ago and got 145, so I've never put much faith into these online tests.

>>9708966
bumpe

>>9708966
I took it for shits and got 123, and that was skipping about 3 questions I couldn't get in under a minute and had about 10 minutes left on the timer so I clearly could have gone back if i had fucks to give.

I was, once, given an actual IQ test and got 130 but that was over a decade ago so 123 isn't an entirely inaccurate modern assessment.

>>9711379
still got more than my gf with full time. The bitch got 103

>>9711398
Just remember, when her IQ is that low it's easy to convince her you love her and to let you do whatever you want to her.

>>9711398
it's good to assess the superiority over your bitch.

Do you get minus points if you guess(wrong) on a question?(I left a few out because I thought that was the case)
I am a maths undergrad and only got 124

>>9711447
124 is still over 1.5SD above the norm, so in a sampling of 99 random people plus you, you'll be one of the smartest people in the room.

>>9711457
I don't care about random people though, I care about people who do mathematics, in that area I am a fucking brainlet.

>>9708966
i got 138
give it to me straight, am i a brainlet?

>>9711477
I dunno, I'm doing research on non-commutative algebras and only got 123 on that exam.

>>9711497
I am glad nobody on 4chan would lie to make another poster feel better, so I can believe this is true.

>>9708966
A total meme.
Everyone here has 120+ without even trying and can get above the 9th decile.
By entering numbers randomly, you should at least be able to get on the bad side of the curve. The test looked legit though, but the scale is wrong.

>>9711525
Yeah man, one of my old profs got an NSERC grant and sent me an email since I was one of her shining stars in undergrad. It wasn't hard when there was only 4 people in my intro abstract algebra and intro analysis courses though.

>>9711540
I tried putting in random answers and the test said my IQ is so low that they can't measure it fucking kek.
Also, I DID try on the test when I took it seriously.

>>9711553
To be honest, I'm pretty sure I'm not in the 98% percentile. I'm probably around 70%
This test sounds like bullshit to me, even if it only measures spatial intelligence. There's still 6 types of intelligence left to measure

>>9708966
>Just how accurate is this?
I don't think it's very accurate.
It seemed too easy. I'm pretty sure I got every question correct.

>>9711578
I found it pretty hard near the end..

>>9711583
yeah I did find question 34 a bit ambiguous

>>9711604
That and another one that I can't remember were really hard imo.
Also, I did a random one again with giving the correct answers to the first 6 or so and got an 85, I cannot imagine how dumb blacks in America are if this gets you an 85

>>9708966
I took the real Mensa test and a more in depths one after that with a real psychologist and the questions on the one you liked seem a bit weak in comparison to the latter.
I've heard that Mensa basically cheats to get more members, so the tests they hold are tailored to 'only' determine if people are in the 97th percentile or above, meaning that the result, while technically correct, can mean that you're a brainlet but they still let you in.

>>9711620
Explains a lot, it's just a demo.

>>9711621
Kinda like all the Faceberg IQ tests - intentionally easy so you get a better result and share it with your buddies, thus generating more ad revenue/ clicks for the owner.

>>9711540
I'm pretty sure the lowest you can get is 90 before it tells you that it can't measure lower. The maker worked with many people from high IQ societies to make it as accurate as possible.

>>9711405
She was very manipulative herself. She used my moral tendencies and defeatism to guilt trip me into acting the way she wanted me to. Really slimy but her IQ was a real surprise to me. I'm starting to think she got a low score on purpose to make me think she is not smart enough to be manipulative (I have been pointing out how she acts sometimes not long before I gave her the test).

>>9711845
See >>9711611

>>9708966
got 107

mommyyyyy im the smartest in the whole world- r-right?

>>9711885
Nope, you're not even a brainlet. You're a micro brainlet.

*blocks your path*
I'm too much of a brainlet for this, help

>>9713999

upside down then intersection

>>9714050
What
Explain it like I am 5

>>9714050
It's not intersection.

>>9714061
after upside down you get that pattern you probably found out with other questions already, if the lines of the upper two images overlap , remove the line, if not, add that line to the third image on the bottom

>>9714061
brainlets :smirk:

>>9714050
>>9714064
Now I got it, thanks

>>9714064

intersection is used if u use the proposed answers

>>9713999
i call these ones "disappearing acts" its basically spatial manipulation.

>>9709281
I know someone like you irl. Yes you are a brainlet

>>9711578
What do you do for a living?

Clicking the top left square as quickly as possible nets this result.

Guess I'm a super genius

>>9714151
Your so dumb you dont understand a bell curve, they literally are telling you that their test doesn't measure retardation. Lol. The "extended area" works both ways.

I've consistently scored between 117 and 121 on online raven's progressive matrices tests over many years. Recently I scored 107 twice on an online verbal IQ test recommended by Emil Kirkegaard (intelligence researcher).

I don't know if the gap implies that my spatial is around 119 while my verbal is around 107 (averaging out to 113), or if one of the tests is a better indication of g and my IQ is closer to one than the other. If anything I think 107 makes the most sense considering the cognitive ability of my nuclear family. They're all pretty average or dumb with no higher education, though the most exceptional person in my extended family is an autist who might be on his way to getting a degree in some hard science so I guess there's some precedent for above average IQ.

>>9714179
110-120 is the patrician IQ range. Being over 120 is like being over 6’2” lol ... weirdos.