/sci/ - Science & Math

>>969484
I can hold two things. They aren't moving infinitely fast to appear as two things--they are two seperate objects made of atoms.

Prove to me that we aren't actually experiencing the Universe backwards until the Big Bang.

Prove to me you're not a faggot.

>>969504

Implying quantum fluctuation has anything to do with relative velocity.

>>969529
>My face when no greentext

Prove to me I'm not Richard Feynman.

>>969529
>he doesn't know how to greentext

>>969557
>implying you have a Magnets pic saved on your computer,
>implying you troll /sci/ with magnetspam

>>969484
The hypothesis immediately confronts two apparent hurdles. The first is the annihilation reaction of an electron and a positron; the second the imbalance of matter and antimatter in the universe. While the first is neatly overcome by the realisation that this event is the precise moment in which the particle reverses its trajectory in time, the second is irreconcilable with our current understanding that matter strongly outweighs antimatter (although this was not well established at the time).

>>969578
>moargreentext

nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger

>>969574
>implying that implying in green text is any better or worse than in regular text

Seriously, stop this shit.

>implying implications which imply that OP is a faggot

>>969590

implying niggers