[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 6 KB, 208x250, 1523282173802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659701 No.9659701 [Reply] [Original]

Why are females so good at deceving males into thinking their love is sincere? What's the scientific explanation for this?

>> No.9659713

>>9659701

1.Guys think with their dicks, feeling 'love/lust' impairs your judgement (both sexes) and women aren't necessarily lieing when they say it.

Most people are fickle, confuse lust with love, and don't think their feelings will change over time (they almost always do)

>> No.9659712
File: 261 KB, 900x701, 1522355970900.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659712

>>9659701

>> No.9659723

Because males are low IQ brainlets desu

>> No.9659727

>>9659701
It only works on betas alphas cant feel love thus are always desires by women since they cant be tamed.

>> No.9659731

>>9659723
Go away misandrist you women are evil

>> No.9659736

>>9659713
Bullshit, most of my friends got dumped by their girlfriends, I can assure you some of them weren't even thinking with their dicks. Never had a girlfriend myself but I'm starting to doubt girls actually understand love. What's up with those creatures?

>> No.9659745
File: 60 KB, 770x424, Skitarii_Rangers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659745

love does'nt exist as what you think it is (there's someone out there for you just you wait!!!!11!!), and what it actually is has been over-romanticised by human culture in general.

"love" is arbitrary, and there is nothing wrong if somehow you end up being unloved

>> No.9659748

>>9659701
Why are males so easily deceived into thinking the "love" of a female is "sincere"?
Maybe it is self-delusion born from desperation.
Maybe it is an inaccuracy in the definition of what the indications of "love" or "sincerity" are.

Like >>9659713 said, people are fickle. Not only that, they can also just be ignorant about what they actually like/want.

>> No.9659753

>>9659736


bullshit? Sounds like those bitches changed their minds when the lust ran out


It takes two people to maintain the relationship and only one of them to ruin it.

Don't let their failures cloud your judgement
There are quality girls out there.

>> No.9659766

>>9659748
It's mostly a society thing. Society isn't redpilled on women

>> No.9659767

>>9659727
This actually makes sense, thanks anon

>> No.9659771

>>9659736
That's why it was good times when the west had arranged marriage, divorce was prohibited, and only whores or widows had more than one man.

And before leftists start screeching, remember that the Islam /Muslims that liberals praise so much has even more conservative marriage system, which is one of the few good parts of Islam by the way.

>> No.9659776

>>9659771
Don't fucking impose your life decisions and religious beliefs on me because you're a loser who can't find a quality girl

>> No.9659782

>>9659771
>That's why it was good times when the west had arranged marriage, divorce was prohibited, and only whores or widows had more than one man.
I WANT TO GO BACK

>> No.9659793

>>9659782
>>9659771

>i'm losing at life, and I want society to fix it for me

Beta faggots

>> No.9659804

>>9659793
Maybe Islam was right all along in this regard at least, whores (male or female) should bite the bullet. Nuclear family is the only way to built a proper human society.

>> No.9659809

>>9659771
liberals =/= leftists

>>9659771
>>9659782
there are issues with modern relationships, but degrading yourself back to feudalism is not an answer

>> No.9659816

Is /sci/ the most alpha board?

>> No.9659818

>>9659701
Because females evolved to attract a man, get him to impregate her, and stick around to protect her and the child

>> No.9659821

>>9659816

/sci/ went so far down the Alphabet past Zeta that it started backwards in reverse again and went back to Alpha.

>> No.9659829
File: 22 KB, 602x396, images(64).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659829

>>9659816
>Is /sci/ the most alpha board?
No it's the /fit/

But at least /sci/ isn't the most beta
Because no board is more beta than /r9k/

>> No.9659831

>>9659829
lol
>Because no board is more beta than /r9k/

/pol/ is pretty beta.

>> No.9659840
File: 33 KB, 554x554, images(65).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659840

>>9659829
>>9659831
Beta uprising

>> No.9659852

>>9659829
/fit/ is definitely not the most alpha.

>> No.9659855

>>9659840
that is an oxymoron dude

>> No.9659857

>>9659831
/pol/ is 4chan, go back to R*ddit if you want a safe space for your numale predisposition.

>> No.9659860

>>9659852
So which one?

>> No.9659868

>>9659857
I don't want a safe space.
I ahte censorship

the problem with you and other /pol/ tards is that if anyone disagrees with you they are safe space faggots

you argue like this because you are a fucking retard who can't think and has to rely on meme graphs for all of your information.

>> No.9659881
File: 774 KB, 748x930, 1515067225307.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659881

>>9659831
/a/ and /g/ are definitely beta.
Is /k/ alpha?

>> No.9659884

>>9659881
/k/ is pretty autismo

>> No.9659888
File: 20 KB, 341x432, images (37).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659888

Are traps beta?

>> No.9659898

>>9659881
/k/ isn't alpha, but it's not beta either

its a mix of gun nuts who won't admit they are sexually aroused by weapons, people who are trying to fill their inadequacies with weapons, and people that have been running around pretending they are a ninja turtle for the last 20 years

/a/
anime sucks so I don't go to that board

/g/ has a heavy neckbeard and population

>> No.9659909

>>9659809
>liberals=/=leftists

Says who? No one thinks of classic liberalism when someone says liberal you autist. They think of a Hillary supporter who enjoys his wife's strap on.

>> No.9659927

>>9659909

Anyone who fully identifies as "right" or "left" is an extremest and a moron.

We call these people "Americans"

>> No.9659939

>>9659927
Politics:
America: left vs right sharply defined
Sweden & Canada: gender fluid

>> No.9659942

>>9659888
Dominating a trap is alpha, being a trap is beta as fuck.

>> No.9659947

>>9659898
/ck/ is def alpha
/co/ is fucking shit
/a/ is a containment board like /v/ and /pol/

>> No.9659948

>>9659942
lol

Alpha faggots

not sayin they dont' exist, i just think it's funny

>> No.9659955

>>9659947
> containment boards

never thought of it like this

makes sense

>> No.9659978
File: 54 KB, 660x800, flat,800x800,070,f.u1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659978

>>9659927
>me: a moderate centrist

>> No.9659989

>>9659793
quality girls dont always exist, and neither do quality guys, it could very well be better for everybody if society imposed quality control onto the lives of men and women.

>> No.9659992
File: 37 KB, 600x511, images(67).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9659992

>>9659978
>>9659927
Why not radical centrist?

>> No.9660000

>>9659978
If you aren't a centrist, especially today, you are a fucking retarded, full blown.

Like seriously, stop associating with political parties, you are the cancer killing America.

>> No.9660001

>>9659868
Why the fuck are you on /sci/ if you can't handle graphs?

>> No.9660003

>>9659992
I like that

because I really hate most people and their overly emotional and irrational responses to situations and circumstances.

>> No.9660005

>>9659989
Nonsense, quality girls exist. There are very attractive women who are not terrible people. They exist.

But there are also attractive women who are terrible people. You just have to search around a little, eventually the right one will click, anon.

>> No.9660008

>>9659989
no

more policing isn't the right choice

beta faggots have the right to be beta faggots

don't micromanage me because they are stupid

>> No.9660012

>>9660000
>Extremism is the answer

Examples of extremism:

Islam
Isis
The KKK
Trump
Hillary Clinton
White supremacists
Social Justice Warriors

the list just goes on and on

>> No.9660018

>>9660001
I like graphs

but I don't just post the same tired meme graph over and over to push my personal ideology as truth on others.

BECAUSE I'M A FUCKING SCIENTIST AND NOT A HACK LIKE YOU

>> No.9660019
File: 180 KB, 404x416, 1365885743422.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9660019

>>9660000

>> No.9660045

>>9659793
If the so called "betas" set up the system and shoot you if you don't comply, who's really the beta?
>inb4 durr if they could do that then they wouldn't be beta

>> No.9660057

>>9660045

You're saying by being submissive you're an alpha?

Is this what your boyfriend tells you?

>> No.9660074

they aren't, guys are good at deceiving themselves

>> No.9660082

>>9660057
I'm saying that forcing arranged marriages at a societal level is not "beta" behavior, claiming it is doesn't make sense at all.
Tbh I don't buy into this alpha beta stuff anyway.

>> No.9660086

>>9660082
>I don't buy into this alpha beta stuff anyway.

Me either
but this is 4chan so I automatically assume you identify as one of them

>> No.9660088

>>9659701
this thread belongs to /b/ or /r9k/ or /trash/, not here

>why are so many males so stupid they are easily fooled?
because evolution is satisficing

>> No.9660096

>>9660088
>satisficing

nice to see someone else who gets it

evolution doesn't mean anything at the individual level other than you got to exist

>> No.9660117

>>9659701
Why are males so bad at detecting deception of females?

There's your scientific explanation - both have evolved this way because it was evolutionary beneficial. A providing male doesn't have the time to waste on rising kids and cooking dinner while a vulnerable female needs protection from a providing alpha, the female then proceeds to give the ability to rise kids efficiently and care for male's needs while male provides the resources as a payment. Both fit perfectly as intended by nature. Whining about "manipulative females" and "golddiggers" is retarded and goes against what nature intended

>> No.9660136

>>9660117
Males on average are only competent at determining aggressiveness

women are much better at reading all other emotional states and are poor at reading aggression


another male killing your babies and raping your women was a much bigger problem before the beta male 4chan existed

>> No.9660137

>>9659701
What happened sci bro?
I'm here for you

>> No.9660139

>>9660136
I have no idea how what you wrote relates to my post, but ok

>> No.9660177

>>9660139
>Why are males so bad at detecting deception of females?

Because we aren't good at reading emotional states

>> No.9660199

>>9660177
Well yeah that's what I said as well, we have specifically evolved like that to be welcoming of female manipulation trying to reach our resources as that then produces high-quality offspring born into wealth, this is why golddiggers exist and should exist. Whining about them like this thread is doing is simply pointless, it's like saying "why are flowers so attractive and welcoming to those nasty bees with their sharp colors if all those bees do is to leech their nectars", they ARE supposed to have their nectar leeched

>> No.9660210

>>9660199
I ANGRILY AGREE WITH YOU

>> No.9660273

>>9659992
>enlightened centrist

*tips emphatically

How does it feel to be a spineless coward with no convictions? To stay willfully blind to the left's destruction of the West is to be part of the problem.

>> No.9660362

>>9660012
Read my post again.

I'm against extremism.

>> No.9660366

>>9660273
Everyone look at this retard and laugh.

Listen, bud. Everyone on 4chan is conservative. No one is a fucking republican. Okay? Okay. Now here you go

>>>/pol/

>> No.9660371

>>9659701
They actually believe it themselves - until they don't anymore.

>> No.9661592
File: 29 KB, 1000x500, 4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9661592

That's why I'm a MGTOW!

>> No.9661614

>>9659898
>t. disarmed europeasant who can´t grasp the thought of a person with a functioning self-preservation instinct
The right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental part of civilized society, brainlet. If it is not upheld, we regress into a feudalist way of life, where the weak (women/children/the elderly) continuously fall prey to the strong (men); egalitarianism cannot exist without a right to arms.

>> No.9662229

This thread was moved to >>>/r9k/44579124