/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9655756
>angle is 50°
>is it greater than 90°?
>how the fuck should i know, since op implemented his retarded system, everything went to shit

>>9655767
in pic related the red angle would be 130-90 = 40

in the first quadrant 50º would be 50º, but when moving to the second quadrant the coordinates for the point would be (r.sin, r.cos) instead of (r.cos,r.sin), since the leg opposite to the angle would be in the x axis instead of the y axis.

>>9655756
fuckin genius

>>9655783
>>9655767
pic explaining

>>9655792
the point is you would have to say that you count the angle from the second quadrant brainlet, which is why it is better to just say 130

>>9655799
dubs speak the truth

>>9655756
This might actually be the dumbest thing I've seen on this board, and I've responded to flat earthers.

>>9655799
i'm counting from the second quadrant, but from the red angle instead of the green one, it's impossible to count a 130º angle in the first quadrant lmao.

>>9655801
why don't you answer my questions?

>>9655804
lmaoooo dude

>>9655804
>it's impossible to count a 130º from the first quadrant
you do know what the quadrants are for right

>>9655813
Sure, because it doesn't makes sense to use angles > 90º in right triangles, my system is better for making the transformation of the angle in the 2nd, 3rd and fourth quadrant into the first quadrant.

For the second quadrant it is angle - 90º, for the third is angle - 180º and the fourth angle - 270º, boom it's translated into the first quadrant.

>>9655821
>what is a period
>what is 2pi=360°

The only problem with this system is this one >>9655792

>>9655822
It's nice that you asked about period, in my system it would look like pic related. You can think for yourself and conclude it is superior.

>>9655835
>what if we take a perfectly understandable graph
>and completely delete the values where it differs

>>9655835
bug fix

>>9655840
well, its a trade off between arbitrarily "beautiful" graph and a superior well fundamented system.

>>9655847
>the graph displays all necessary information
>what if we take that and make the information different that will surely make sense hurr >>9655844
>well fundamented
by whom holy kek

>>9655855
>the graph displays all necessary information
yes
>what if we take that and make the information different that will surely make sense hurr
it's different because we are measuring them differently, with a better system that does the quadrant conversion easily.

>>9655835
You not only want to make it non-smooth, but you want to make it discontinuous too...

>>9655756
>hey guys what would happen if we did everything a little dumber for no reason
hopefully you'd kill yourself so the world would get some benefit out of it

>>9655873
It's not dumber! It has better quadrant conversion, it's better fundamented.

>>9655875
And your brain has fermented

>>9655920
why?

>>9655924
because you are pic related

>>9655928
just explain to me why, the system works.

>>9655932
what is the angle of 3pi/4?

what the fuck am i reading

>>9655947
Look here: >>9655821
3pi/4 - 2pi/4 (90º) = pi/4 = 45º