/sci/ - Science & Math

d

Learn to finish your damn sentences, pleb.

>>9651272
I thought measuring intelligence was racist? Why are they using it to put down STEM men?

Also, just because male perception underestimates female ability doesn't mean women are as good as men in this area

I only understimate the pretty ones, because they are duller than me. The ugly jewish women on the other hand seem to do well.

>>9651272
if they doubt themselves only because someone else underestimate them, yeah, they're stupid as fuck

>>9651272
Just because a study, which isn't cited and isn't necessarily any good, says women aren't as dumb as women think they are doesn't mean they aren't stupid. It just means women think they're even stupider than they actually are.

Which kind of proves the antecedent anyway.

>>9651272
The pictured text does not claim that women are smart. Are you dense?

>>9651272
Girls aren't stupid.
From what I've gathered, they're normal human beings.
Except they take mundane competition to another level.
They can't bear to be outdone by another female.
It's that simple.
If you're gonna have a female in your team, just get a lone one.

>>9651809
just a reminder that this also happens with soyboys too, so don't have a woman and a soyboy on the team too because the same effect happens

>>9651809
>defective or missing Sry gene
>normal human beings
Pick one

You know, most people are afraid of solipsism as a philosophy, but I'm starting to embrace it as it makes me less angry about this shit. At least I can pretend they're all dream characters and their sole purpose is to keep up the dream narrative.

>>9651821
Don't be harsh, that's a necessary evolutionary trait for them.
Basically, they just want to be the best female out there.
No matter what the subject is.
It's hard to catch up to men, but they can do it.

You see, they actually need the competition. If it wasn't there, they wouldn't even try.
And there's a reason they're trying hard in IT.
They think finding a mate in this field will provide for her family. It's very subconscious, but it's there.

Anyways, they'll always be shit coworkers, and nothing short of evolution will change that.

>>9651816
>>9651809
What about non soylent traps?

>>9651272
KEK
fuck off shekel news

>>9651840
50/50

>>9651816
Yeah and helicopter gunships aren't always bitching /s

>>9651855
what?

>>9651856
i think he's a redditor trying to make an epic "le attack helicopter" joke.

>>9651272
If you fold in my bluff, the fool is you.

>>9651836
I'll add to this.
Women respond to feeling challenged.
They don't undergo anything seriously besides that.
If they're ugly, they'll use make-up.
If they're skill-less, they'll fucking go at it until they're better, or at least on par with their coworker.
It's like the definition of a social pressured organism.

I'll just add that I have a coworker that doesn't abide by those rules.
I guess she just gave up on having a familly and shit.
She's literally like a normal male coworker to me.
It's a shame, because she's a solid 8/10, even at 30 yo.

>>9651856
you heard me.

>>9651272
>A new study finds that men(not a specific group of men or one man) are dumb and women are not. But women aren't being treated good enough because of how dumb men are. So even though women are not dumb, they act like it because it's men's fault.


Well goddamn. Me and the rest of you bastards better owe up to just how bad women are doing because of us. (seriously though, I had to literally make up some kind of feminist fantasy in my head just to somehow make this post make sense.)

Who knew, Women psyche hasn't been looked int o int he last thousand years?
Let me translate it:
They're very capable of intelligence, but they won't unless their bloodline, and more importantly their ass,depends on it.

>>9651272
>... women can be victims of stereotype threat.

BREAKING NEWS. I fucking hate NBC.

>>9651809
women are more emotionally intelligent than men

>>9651987
Who cares?

>>9651272
Girls don't have a giant victim compl-

>>9651781

Its not "just because someone", it's just because every single person around them doubts them.

>>9652108
everyone doubts me too
hasn't stopped me from achieving anything

>>9652108
>be unassertive
>get pissed off at even the most inane criticisms
>get into school with lower grades
>take way more time off than the average male employee
M..mean boys, why do they doubt me so much?

>>9652058
This. Except the main driving force behind it is the media’s rabid encouragement

>>9651867
Pretty sure that's a pole meem

>>9651272
Was this study done by women’s studies degree holders? The ones that think telling a pretty women hello is micro aggression?

>>9652300
yeah i said redditor didn't i?

>Most annoyingly, her objections were not mere perversity: at this stage the embarrassing fact came out that my recollection of the water content of Rosy's DNA samples could not be right. The awkward truth became apparent that the correct DNA model must contain at least ten times more water than was found in our model. This did not mean that we were necessarily wrong ― with luck the extra water might be fudged into vacant regions on the periphery of our helix. On the other hand, there was no escaping the conclusion that our argument was soft. As soon as the possibility arose that much more water was, involved, the number of potential DNA models alarmingly increased.
>James D. Watson
Women should be outlawed from university.

Not bad /sci/, my bait thread on /g/ had already reached 300+ posts by now

>>9651272
>women can't perform unless men believe they can perform
Or maybe women just cant perform?

"A new study finds"

>scientific study proves non-scientific hypothesis
Gives these brave souls a Nobel Prize. Amazing.

>>9651272

>actually read the study

Few extremely significant confounding variables:

1. GPA reference rather than specific course performance.

2. "outspokenness" was established through polling the course instructor after course completion, and didn't factor the accuracy of answers given.
...so this study empirically proves nothing, and absolutely shouldn't be getting bandied about the media, how utterly unsurprising.

>>9653199
Wow... That's fucking amateur

The study itself for your reference /sci/: https://www.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/advan.00085.2017

>>9651272
Leddit on the case:

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/8a55bb/a_new_study_finds_that_men_in_stem_subject_areas/dwwgbdc

>>9653199
>media misrepresenting studies to further an agenda
imagine my shock

>>9652830
But pole is not reddit. Am I being trolled? Or is this one of those "everything I don't like is reddit" moments?

>>9653232
>producing useless research for propaganda and tenure
imagine my shock

>>9651987
EI is a consolation prize for dumb people who still want to feel important.

>>9652108
Do you really expect socially inept nerds to understand that? They don't believe environmental influences play a big role in a person's psyche. They will simply state that everyone needs to "suck it up" and put on their boots.

>>9651272
>intelligence
>credentials
>abilities

Where does it say that men underestimate womens intelligence and credentials (under/over estimating credentials? Is that even possible?)

>>9651272
One of the drawback of science feminism is that they address the (so called) issue of women shortage by filling academia with women who otherwise may not even be have there. In other terms, they make the female rate in science going from (for instance) 10% female to 40% by inroducing 30% iincompetent women, who will just illustrate further the point that women can't do sicnec, at least in the eyes of those who were already convinced of that.

BAN ASAP quotas, affirmative action, epistemological revisionism (equating the merit of a legit male scientist or idscoverer with some secretary who happened to work with him) (btw role model aren't any useful for anything, this is not what motivated people to study science: science is the contemplation of nature and has nothing to do with being cool and becoming like someone cool).

countries who produce more stem female are arabic countries: please explain. Where is feminism here?
Help me recall from which feminist country comes the first femal fields medal recipient?

>>9651987
Doubt it. I would say that tgey are more socially int because they know how to use social stigmas in best use but they are a total mess in their heads always overthinking stuff.

>>9653871
>/sic/ - sicnec nd met

>>9651987
>women themselves doubt their abilities
>women are more emotionally intelligent than men

Random study finds conclusion it set out to find.

More at 11

>>9651272
>study
Holy fuck show evidence not pseudo science.

>>9651987
What the fuck does this mean?

>>9653894
>does he write with his hands?

>>9651987
Wrong. Women can only (badly) emulate emotions while men can actually experience them.

>>9653240
shut up nog don't you know about the r/the_donald invasion?

>>9653227
fucking epic

>>9653210
>https://www.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/advan.00085.2017
>For example, instructors could assign an "equity monitor"during group discussion, whose responsibility it is to make sure that each person in the group gets a chance to contribute.

When SJW's invade STEM

>>9653227
>REDDIT

>>9654554
>Equity monitors were found to be shitlords who expected minority and women to contribute.