[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 48 KB, 312x400, ascension73_02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9647381 No.9647381 [Reply] [Original]

Why do you think the universe exists? not how, but why.

>> No.9647386
File: 18 KB, 180x180, 180px-MW-creature-Dagoth_Ur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9647386

>>9647381
why not lmao !

>> No.9647422
File: 107 KB, 540x960, pangris.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9647422

>>9647381
teleology is an illusion

>> No.9647847
File: 199 KB, 675x1603, a_bunch_of_rocks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9647847

>>9647381
>all solutions to y=x^2 exists whether you 'observe' them, in the form of a graph or a calculation, or not
>all solutions for Mandelbrot fractals exists whether they are observed or not
>Therefore we can imagine a math space where all possible logical equations and all their infinite derivations and solutions are present
>One such equation network describes our universe
>The meaning of why i can poop

>> No.9648207

>>9647847
Seriously, is there any better 'how' and 'why'?

>> No.9648237

>>9647381
In whatever cases the universe does not exist, there is nothing. Nothing can't be counted, so everything (including us) will always exist in cases where the universe exists. In other words, if you integrate all possible things across all possible cases (in probability space or whatever, this is an abstract exercise and I'm just trying to stay away from using words like "when" that imply the passage of time) only cases where the universe exists will be represented.

>> No.9648239

>>9647386
fpbp
daily reminder that lorkhan did nothing wrong

>> No.9648245

>>9647386
I am a god.

How can you kill a god?

>> No.9648257

nothing is unstable and decays

>> No.9648296

>>9648257
That's "how" more than "why" and also implies that time passes "when" there is no universe. (of course there is no "when" if there is no time.)

>> No.9648316

>>9647381
I figured it out. It is our base.

:(

Regardless of whether multiverse is real or not it becomes evident that we all decided to New Game this "simulation" but what is a code in a simulation if not a human being to the real world.
We are here to start fresh. Our past memories deleted and/or we literally spawned here because this is the forst and only world we ever decided to experience.

D

>> No.9648354
File: 45 KB, 550x426, because fuck you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9648354

>>9647381

>> No.9648362

>>9647381

The universe doesn't exist. Every quality and quantity in the universe is symmetrical and cancels out. Its like the following, but ad infinitum and with quality instead of just quantity:

[math] 0 = 0 [/math]
[math] (\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} 2^{-i}) - 2 = 0 [/math]
[math] (\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sum_{l=0}^{i}\binom{i}{l}}) - \text{lim}_{n \rightarrow \infty} (\text{ln}(n) - \frac{n}{\pi(n)}) - (1-x)\sum_{h = 0}^{\infty} x^h = 0 [/math]

Once you reconcile all the symmetries you are left with nothing. That's why consciousness is splintered, because if the universe was conscious as a whole, it would cease to exist. Also that is why we don't observe advanced civilizations: the more advanced a civilization/consciousness becomes, the more it suffers from large case 'cancellation' by e.g. realizing that suffering and enjoyment are simply opposing yet equal processes driven by evolved reinforcement entangled to qualia.

>> No.9648370

>>9648257
t. retard who listens to lawrence m. krauss

>> No.9648436

>Why
Trying to apply a non-observable linguistic concept to reality ; OP is a brainlet.

>> No.9648443

There is no "why". The universe exists because it's possible for it to exist.

>> No.9648454
File: 35 KB, 572x681, eed01c5c9ef4a5734dc4d2337a460b908d81da58v2_hq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9648454

>>9647847
This is actually pretty neat.

>> No.9648499
File: 48 KB, 800x729, 1522878701868.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9648499

>>9648443
>There is no why... The universe exists because

>> No.9648527

>>9647381
Because I needed a place to live.

>> No.9648977

>>9648499

I mean there is no philosophical or mystical reason for its existence.