/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9595566
it's missing some giant elephants and a turtle

>>9595566
Try searching for things OTHER than "flat earth" or "Terry Pratchett".

>>9595574
Fpbp, learn the truth sheeple

That's a dis-info image.

>>9595727
I've always wondered, how exactly do you explain the Sun?
Right now i can instantly talk with a person far away and he tells me it's night for him, there's no sun in his sky, yet I can see the Sun
If I talk with another person in Japan for example he tells me the sun is just rising, yet I can still see it high in the sky.
How exactly does that work? Are they all random people I talk to part of the conspiracy?
Why does the round Earth model fit so well and easy with all this evidence, and why are all the other celestial objects we see in the sky sphere-like?

>>9595746
logic does not work on morons.

>>9595574

>>9595574
Shut up, Pterry, you're ded.

>>9595759

>>9595574
>>9595867

>>9596201
Just think... with all those stupid, ignorant answers... they're ultimately more correct than a flat-Earther.

How low we've sunk.

>>9597149
>more correct
you mean correcter ?
come on now anon don't be afraid to use big words just because they're a lil bit rare

>>9595746
>what is a spotlight

>>9595566
>Elena Schweitzer
I have the same thing with porn. Look for blonde lesbian, get black people and cucks

>>9595574
FPBP I think this every damn time someone comes up with this bullshit.

>>9597470
Something that would not result in the observed behavior of the sun under the flat Earth hypothesis

>>9598882

It would if you understood that the sun is much closer and is moving closer and further away as it circles above. Things further away move towards the horizon line, and the atmosphere acts like a curtain for the light to pass through.

>>9598923
apparent speed of sun in the sky is the same throughout the day
you can see the sun's disk going below the horizon at sunset
there's night without the sun visible
at the north and south pole there's 6 months day and 6 months night
antarctica has been explored, and it's not retarded big as your flatearth map shows
eclipses of the moon and the sun

all these, and more, cannot be explained in your moronic model

>>9598977
>apparent speed of sun in the sky is the same throughout the day

Wrong, it slows down as it sets. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz_jBGga0js

>you can see the sun's disk going below the horizon at sunset

Wrong, that's an illusion of perspective. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oBmNe13AVE

>there's night without the sun visible

Wrong. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdBR3tDXyVw

>at the north and south pole there's 6 months day and 6 months night

Wrong, no proof of this at the south "pole".

>antarctica has been explored, and it's not retarded big as your flatearth map shows

Wrong. Very little is known about Antarctica thanks to the Antarctic Treaty.

>eclipses of the moon and the sun

Solar eclipses work the same way. Lunar "eclipses" are not due to a shadow being cast on earth, go and watch one.

>>9599014

>>9599020

>I have no argument

>>9599033
when I see one that makes any sense from you, I'll respond

>>9599040
LOL! Someone better give the sun a speeding ticket!

What if I told you a mind can only understand itself and that the Earth can be flat if the flatness would be convenient and useful?

>>9595574
THE TURTLE MOVES!

>>9599014
all of this is bullshit.
Additionally, how does the flat earth model explain the positions and movement of the starts, particularly the way the same stars can be viewed from multiple positions on earth at relative angles that correspond perfectly to those we would see where we standing on a giant globe.

It really isn't possible to argue successfully with a flat-Earther for three reasons:
1) They are not interested in the truth (virtually all are juvenile-level trolling, but some are delusional or choose to accept an oddly literal interpretation of some select Bible passages).
2) They make stuff up as they go along, keeping the stuff that sticks.
3) Most importantly, they don't offer any proof that requires a flat Earth paradigm to explain. They rather claim everyone has been misled and dismiss out of hand every proof offered. So there is no theory to argue.

The whole movement nefariously places the onus on you to prove the round Earth. Their only tactic is to disavow any science or proofs put forward. You're probably going to use information that is readily available (and they could have looked up). Then you're called a 'shill' and your argument is dismissed. Through proliferate offerings of easily dismissed posits, they "win" by eroding your patience. It is simply impossible to keep up with having to explain away the barrage of assaults violating the most basic principles of geometry, math, science, and logic. Trolls will simply respond with an insult to incite any response and continue wearing you down.

>>9599778
Doesn't the bible call the world round though

>>9599014
Please explain apparent 15 degree motion of the sun using a flat earth model. And don't post a youtube video.

>>9600834
No

>>9600834
>>9600944
http://biblehub.com/isaiah/40-22.htm

>>9599741
Brutha where art thou?

>>9600982
Is a circle round. Though?

>>9601006
yes

>>9601006
>>9601054
No, a circle =/= ball.

neither does round = spherical
a ball is spherical, a disc is round.

>replying to Flat-Earthers at all

Why.