[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 6 KB, 275x183, Hawking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9589397 No.9589397 [Reply] [Original]

>given 2 years to live at time of ALS diagnosis
>survives 55 years further
>goes on to be one of the most recognized scientists of the modern age

Hawking may have died, but he died a true Chad.

>> No.9589406

imagine how impressive it would have been if he had actually done some science too.

>> No.9589463

>>9589406
people will remember him for 1000s of years because he discovered black holes must radiate due to quantum mechanics, meanwhile you will die in obscurity, jealous brainlet

>> No.9589471

>>9589463
>black holes must radiate due to quantum mechanics

what would be the implications of this, and how do we test for it?

>> No.9589496

>>9589471
why don't you inform yourself?
use search
https://arxiv.org

>> No.9589498

>>9589463
Erm, excuse me? Wouldn't it have been more important to prove that black holes exist first?

>> No.9589506

>>9589471
The implication is that information can be destroyed, instead of just transformed

>> No.9589508

>>9589498
we already have proof of that, from multiple kinds of observations

>> No.9589519

>>9589508
Pure conjecture, there's no decisive evidence, no matter how likely it is that they exist.......

>> No.9589520

>>9589496
you don't know, do you?

>>9589506
i don't think you understand what "implications" means in this context.

>> No.9589555

>>9589471
It means black holes can be farmed as the most efficient matter to energy conversion engines in the universe.
If mankind survives, his name, or a derivation of it, will be remembered for millions or billions of years.

>> No.9589556
File: 87 KB, 1280x720, 1521020972237.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9589556

>>9589397
His soul is burning in hell. sorry Faketheists.

>> No.9589566

>>9589397

how many accepted peer reviewed papers did he coauthor?

>> No.9589607

>>9589555
big if true.

are there any ways to see if it is true (what i mean by "implications") or is it all just conjecture?

you know, like the existence of black holes themselves?

>> No.9589635

>>9589607
the existence of black holes has been proved, both by observations of star movements around Sagittarius A* and by the gravity waves of inspiraling binary bh in multiple detectors
the detection of hawking radiation will have to wait until we can make a bh, or get close to one

>> No.9589638

>>9589556
So are you for taking pleasure in it.
You overtly loud and boastful Christian.
You have fallen to pride.

In short, see you there in a few years.
-Wrath.

>> No.9589670
File: 41 KB, 800x534, 15873512_10154881156308980_3642156949711995489_n (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9589670

>>9589635
man, even einstein's plagiarized theory had to be tested with starlight bending around the sun during an eclipse before the kike media inflated his celebrity beyond all reason.

>> No.9589722

>>9589397
He's in hell now

>> No.9589806

>>9589635
>>9589670
It's proven that there's SOMETHING there that has crazy gravitational pull, but it's not guaranteed to be a black hole.

We're getting a picture later this year though, should be interesting to see just what the hell this fucking thing is