/sci/ - Science & Math

No. The goverment in general isn't really "pro-science" and it's stupid to put your complete trust on a party and justify it as "they follow science", but right wing parties have adopted a weird conservatism that is against some important scientific discoveries. Again this doesn't mean the left isn't excepmt, but what SJWs say isn't considered a pressing issue by real scientists while global warming is.

Yes

im a normie brainlet and ive noticed most media that is shown or that i access doesn't really give me a clear picture on certain scientific theories and discoveries, can someone give me some good sources for these kinds of things?

>Help, help I'm being oppressed!

>>9545750
Hardliners on both sides of the political spectrum are guilty of this. The left has their ativaxxers and the right has their climate change deniers. Both sides also like to assume a moral high ground when discussing certain topics, without any consideration of other arguments, because they are "morally wrong".

Radicalism, scientific illiteracy and lack of critical thinking are problems that go beyond any one pollitical ideology.

>>9545750

who cares? they are both bad in that sense
there is not scientifically good political party and there will never be one

>>9545750
>owners of grand scientific institutions enforce cultural marxism
>the people who be doing science n shiet are therefore leftists too

lmao

>>9545773
newscientist, nature, scientific american, science daily, google scholar(not media just a better way to be informed if you know what you're doing), etc?

>>9545750
only because leftists have more influence in politics at the moment.

practically everyone in politics only pushes the pro-science agenda when it suits them, regardless of political leaning

Politics has no business with science.

fuck off, fascists

>>9545773
This chart is a pretty good basic guide
Sauce:
>https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/03/05/infographic-best-and-worst-science-news-sites-10948?source=acsh.org