[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 219 KB, 1654x1344, Screen Shot 2018-02-05 at 2.19.37 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9485524 No.9485524 [Reply] [Original]

>University doesnt matte-

This is from a test for 17-18 year olds who want to do math tripos at Cambridge. You should be able to solve it then.

>> No.9485529

>>9485524
That's trivial.

>> No.9485532

>>9485524
Do your own homework.

>> No.9485555

>>9485532
>>9485529
t. brainlets who are insecure about their shit college

>> No.9485570

>>9485555
>t. brainlets who are insecure about their shit college
I went to a university, not a college.

>> No.9485571

Something is going on, on /sci/, it may be that the board is better when there are no school days, I noticed this board was less insane just 48 hours ago. Not great, but not as bad.

>> No.9485588
File: 352 KB, 768x934, rape flowers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9485588

Rape

>> No.9485603

>>9485524
(i) Use partial integration twice to get the recursion then use induction to solve it.
(ii) Use u-substitution.
(iii) Divide numerator and denominator by x^(2n) then apply the formulas from (ii) and (i) with f(x) = 1/(1+x)^n.

>> No.9485620

Mathmo at Cambridge here, got 100+ on both STEP II and III.
Feels good to not be a brainlet.

>> No.9485635

Also that question is on the very easy end of STEP problems...

>> No.9485644

>>9485635
Post the hardest then.

>> No.9485646

>>9485635
Definitely, thats more of a hard A level problem

>> No.9485662

>>9485570
this is how you know the OP is a roleplaying amerifat, amerifats don't distinguish between college/university in speech

>> No.9485677
File: 87 KB, 699x759, 2003.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9485677

>>9485524
I used these papers as practice for the final year of high school in the higher mathematics courses here in Australia, they are pretty fun.
pic related is one of the hard questions in high school mathematics in Australia

>> No.9485679
File: 11 KB, 520x204, f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9485679

>tfw cant do any of them
am i fucked?

>> No.9485687

>>9485677
That's pretty cool, quite similar to STEP except you get some more hand-holding.

I wish A-Level Maths had been more like that, so people would have to understand what's going on rather than being able to pass by blindly memorising techniques.

>> No.9485717
File: 106 KB, 1421x898, 2010.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9485717

>>9485687
To be fair I posted a rather exceptional example, there is usually only 1 of these kinds of questions per year in the final paper (highest maths course in NSW). Even there you can sort of get by with just memorization, but it won't get you as high of a score as you could by actually understanding the content and having problem solving skills.

>> No.9485774
File: 57 KB, 1314x361, wtf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9485774

>>9485524
Lol. There is no way I would've been able to solve this after school. I'm not a maths student though. Also brainlet question: How are these two equal?

>> No.9485782

>>9485774
f(x) is a set of functions
I couldn't do this to save my life either

>> No.9485793

>>9485774
It is certainly possible, because although [math]f((x - x^{-1})^2) > x^{-2} f((x-x^{-1})^2) [/math] for ONLY [math]x > 1 [/math], but also [math] f((x - x^{-1})^2) < x^{-2} f((x-x^{-1})^2) [/math] for [math] 0 < x < 1 [/math], meaning it is possible that by integrating over the entire domain (0, infinity) we "cancel the difference out", leading to the same value for the integral.

The proof anyway is by setting [math]u = \frac{1}{x} [/math], this is a valid substitution as the function is monotone, we change the limits from (0, infinity) to (infinity, 0) and we substitute in du, to obtain:

[math]J = \int_{\infty}^0 f((u^{-1} - u)^2) (-u^{-2}) \mathrm{d}u = \int_0^{\infty} u^{-2} f((u - u^{-1})^2) \mathrm{d} u [/math]

Of course, since it is a definite integral we can change the u for an x and it remains the same.

>> No.9485804

>>9485793
>>9485774
Was there a typo?

>> No.9485828

>>9485620

proof?

>> No.9485899

>>9485524
[math]I_{n+1}[/math] is very ugly written that way; it's easier to prove that
[eqn]I_{n+1}=\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\cdot\frac\pi2[/eqn]

>> No.9485909

>>9485899
>not

[math]\displaystyle \frac{4^n I_{n+1}}{\binom{2n}{n}} = \frac{\pi}{2} [/math]

>> No.9485921

>>9485793
Thanks m8

>> No.9485959

wtf how do i do the first problem

>> No.9486141
File: 1.48 MB, 2054x1037, the_change_in_sci_from_2015-2017.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9486141

>>9485571
This is what happened.

>> No.9486166

>>9486141
>cherrypicking

>> No.9486168

>>9485959
[eqn] I_n - I_{n+1}= \int_0^\infty \frac{u^2}{(1+u^2)^{n+1}}du \\
= \frac{1}{2n} \int_0^\infty \frac{2nu}{(1+u^2)^{n+1}} \, u \; du \\
= \frac{1}{2n} \left( \left[\frac{-1}{(1+u^2)^n} u \right]_0^\infty + \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{(1+u^2)^n} du \right) \\
= \frac{1}{2n} I_n [/eqn]

>> No.9486180
File: 1.95 MB, 237x240, plebbit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9486180

>>9486166
No, it really isn't newfag. Look at the archive for yourself:
>http://archive.is/Txkqc
It is evident that /sci/ has decreased in quality. In fact, the occurrence of pointless and easily defused contrarians, like you, is evidence of that.

>> No.9486962

>>9485620
teach me your ways, sensei

>> No.9487005

>>9486168
[math]I_1=arctan(u)|_0^ \infty = \frac{\pi}{2}\\
I_{n+1} = I_{n} \left(1-\frac{1}{2n}\right) = I_n \left(\frac{2n-1}{2n}\right) = I_n \frac{1}{2} \frac{2n-1}{n}
\\ \prod_{k=1}^{n} 2k-1 = \frac{(2n)!}{2^n n!}
\\ I_{n+1} = \frac{\pi}{2}\frac{1}{2^n}\frac{(2n)!}{2^n (n!)^2} = \frac{(2n)!\pi}{2^{2n+1}(n!)^2}
[/math]
QED

>> No.9487014

>>9485774
let u=(x-1/x), then du = 1+1/x^2 dx

what happened to the factor of 1/2?

>> No.9487018

>>9487014
nvm, the bounds become (-∞,∞) and it gets reduced to 2x (0,∞) by being even.

>> No.9487031

>>9485662
>I know amerifat speech
No, you do not -- for if you did, you would know
Amerifatica is a large country with many dialects,
and many different idioms -- but you know nothing about them.

>> No.9487039

>>9485524
I mean, I can do these fairly easily now, but I am at the last year of my math studies.
I don't think I could do them before I entered uni.
We weren't taught improper integrals, we never tried solving integrals using inverse trigonometric functions, and we hadn't even defined factorials as far as I remember.
After like a couple of days of training I probably could solve them, but it would be really hard cause no mathematical maturity.

>> No.9487064

>>9485524
(iii)
[math]
\int_{0}^\infty dx \frac{x^{2n-2}}{(x^4-x^2+1)^n} = \int_{0}^\infty dx \frac{x^{-2}}{(x^2 - 1 + 1/x^2)^n} = \int_{0}^\infty dx \frac{x^{-2}}{(x^2 - 2 + 1/x^2 + 1)^n} = \int_{0}^\infty dx \frac{x^{-2}}{((x - 1/x)^2 +1)^n} = \int_{0}^\infty du \frac{1}{(u^2 +1)^n} = \frac{(2n-2)!\pi}{2^{2n-1}(n-1!)^2}
[/math]

>> No.9487175

>>9485524

Even though I have a math degree, I always hated this kind of problems and avoided any area that involved a lot of computations.
Also, I noticed that the ones who were good at solving these usually weren't interested in generalized abstract nonsense...
I guess solving integrals doesn't prove much more than that you're well trained in solving integrals.

>> No.9487177

Just because it's hard to do mentally doesn't mean not everyone who graduated from high school can do it with a draft sheet at disposal, you stupid memester.

>> No.9487191

>>9485524
CS major here from some no name uni. Even I can do this, lmaoing at you mathfags

>> No.9487192

>>9486180
>retarded black hole post
>qc thread
>clockbro (generic mainstreamers think X thread)
>transhumanist
>atheist
>diet
>is it viable to X (hint: no)
>explain X
>philosophy questions
>google this for me
>why do we X (even through we have 14 years of general education)
>explain this meme
>more transhumist shit
>strawpoll tell me what to do because I'm a brainlet
>frogpost
>areufuckingkiddingme
>womyn in stem
any one of these threads could have been posted last week. /sci/ looks very much the same to me.

>> No.9487366

Wait, dont you go to uni at 19? in norway you go to uni after 13th grade, in which you're 19 years old at the end of.

>> No.9487403

>>9485620
Post your original discordo please mang. I need to learn your ways!

>> No.9487468

>doing integrals in high school meme
i dislike this retarded curriculum which focuses only on calculus and analysis
if you're ahead of your class and want to learn more math, why not learn something that is actually fun

>> No.9487477
File: 34 KB, 657x527, 1515620309178.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9487477

>>9485620
Did you have to study math beforehand or is this stuff obvious to non-brainlets?

>> No.9487486
File: 42 KB, 480x542, e07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9487486

>>9485620
h-how early did you start the prep? is it too late to start in feb?

>> No.9487521

>>9487486
>>9487477
>>9486962

Spent ~3 hours a week for about a year doing STEP/ Olympiad / other interesting maths.

February isn't too late, but I wouldn't leave it any longer. Consistently doing this stuff allows you to gain more mathematical maturity. Cramming isn't really feasible.

This sort of maths is quite fun though, so if you really enjoy maths it won't feel like hard work.
If you hate the prep then you will realise maths isn't for you. The people who were lukewarm about maths before coming to Cambridge now fucking hate it so be warned!

>> No.9487567
File: 911 KB, 640x1064, STEP Q1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9487567

Done

>> No.9487719

>>9487521
I graduated with a degree in Physics but this sounds fun. How can I get started on this?