/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9465134
>>>/g/tfo

>>9465134
I think Trigonometry is cute.

>>9465190
kawaii desu ne math-chan

it can't be because you exist

Yes. Study the superior, more intuitive Rational Trigonometry instead.

Sometimes

>>9465594
fuck yeah

>>9466419
>>9465594
STOP THIS MEME

>>9465134
since rotating objects and electromagnetic waves are "bound" by trig, no, it's one of the most useful things ever.

>>9465134
More useful than imaginary and complex garbage. The foundation of synthesizers are graphing trig functions and the manipulation of them with signal processors

>>9465134
Have you every used a map?

>>9465134
Also very useful if you're making some reasearch in geometry OP. Einsteins Theory of Relativity if riemannian geometry. No GPS, cellphones, or tv would have been possible without it.

>>9465134
Tell that to my dad he was a sniper he used trigonometry so he can shoot precise shots he never missed it's kind of annoying when he goes To pee but hey you got to do what you got to do he also co-starred in the movie with Angelina Jolie and James McAvoy wanted he was the black guy in the coach when they start shooting you really can't see him but you can kind of see the back of his head if you really zoom in so yeah my dad is a Hollywood store he also played the role of a trash can in an animated movie

> he hasn't studied further than highschool maths
Trig is as basic as complex numbers and algebra.

>>9467220
Yeah, when I went to your mom's house to fuck her

>>9465134
Walked into my Physics class hoping to god trig wasn't going to be used very much

Found out it was using in literally everything

>>9465134
lul. trig is the foundation of analytic geomtery

You never set foot in a physics or engineering class have you?

>>9465134
>try to do integral
>some rational function, no idea
>google solution
>some american substitutes some random trigonometric function I didnt even know has its own name
>keeps shuffling around expressions that would take me a minute to write down without knowig 20 functions and their derivatives by hard
>voila
integrals suck

>>9465134
>Is Trigonometry the most useless thing ever?

Your bait is plainly obvious

>>9467902

>>9465134
You can use it to prove the Earth is flat. That s useful

>>9466442
>meme
Anon, I'm hurt...

>>9467902
This

>>9468042
>the flatearther is still mad about being blown out

>>9465134
I don't know man that looks pretty rad

>>9466603
... Trig and complex start off as basically the same thing, Anon. For fucks sake, you can even write all your trig in complex formulas.

>>9468042
lol

>>9469572
good pun

>>9465134
Trigonometry was used for numerous things
To discover the distance to planets
To build bridges
To build buildings

These things would not be possible, or near impossible, without trigonometry

>>9465190
cute

>>9471832
https://m.imgur.com/a/ve1rN

>>9471832
>>9473515
https://m.imgur.com/a/8Qfqh

>get meme'd hard by trig my first time in college
>tough prof barely make a B
>yeahiknow.brainlet
>have to fight hard for the grade, but learn a lot in the process
>but oh well, fuck this shit, it's not like ill ever need trig again
>trig derivatives in calc1
>trig integrals, polar coordinates, and trig series in calc2
>more trig integral in calc3 and diffEQs
>... fast forward, here I am in complex analysis...
>trig trig trig euler trig [math]rcos(θ)[/math] trig [math]i[/math] trig trig
>mfw I can't even remember any identities
>mfw I can't even remember the unit circle
>mfw I can't even remember what equilateral means

tldr; it's NOT a meme young brainlets.
t. buttblasted trigfagg

>>9471832
>>9473515
>>9473519

>>9473519
>>9473558
>>9473515
>>9471832
>>9468042
https://m.imgur.com/a/aA94h

>>9465134
no

>>9473565

>>9473532
why did you see trig for the first time in college? I'm confused.

>>9473573
ΘXZ is a ninety, by definition. You are projecting the perceived curvature away which, by the way, could be seen in the Y axis in this case.

Why doesn't the shadow of the highway run parallel to the highway? (Z axis isn't parallel to itself)

>>9473573
Are you fucking retarded? Go retake calc III you faggot.

>>9473594
Actually your confusion is warranted. Technically I saw trig for the first time in high school. I chose to be an edgy teenager though and skip that class until I got removed from it, because I felt much the same way OP probably does. Thus, I had to take it in college. And that's my story, anon.

>>9473600
Less ad hominem
More math
20+ miles of curvature missing from Kansas

>>9473656
The apex should be as high as the world's tallest building stacked on top of itself 38 times.
If Earth was a sphere of the dimensions everyone was told.

Ad hominem on though

>>9473656
>>9473664
http://www.usu.edu/geo/geomorph/kansas.html

>>9473669
Is there some kind of quest for most autistic post in universe of with i don't know about?

>>9473599
What s the name of the scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water can hold a convex shape?

I can observe a 30 mile long flat ocean line between to points where I live. Check the trig chart. If the Earth is a sphere of the dimensions we ve been told, that 8 inches time the distance squared. An apex of about 600 feet.

>>9473519
>>9473515
>>9468042
>>9471832
>>9473558
>>9473565

>>9473656
Do you know what a linear approximation is?

>>9473699
Yes
Something your not going to be able to use to disprove my posts or that the Earth is a sphere.
>>9473693

>>9473699
No, same anon though - when I think of "linear" I usually think of cocks :^) am I on the right track?

>>9473740
*Two dimensional
I miss types from the crippling lulz
Metabunk.org and sci kept posting two dimensional CGI towers as proof of the Earth s curvature.
https://m.imgur.com/a/aA94h

>>9473750
https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/

>>9473754

>>9473740
>>9473750
>>9473754
>>9473756

https://youtu.be/cy6CFTMnYa4

>>9473573
I'd like to see the original photo in full resolution, without markup

>>9474833
http://lmgtfy.com/?t=i&q=lake+pontchartrain+bridge

8 inches times the distance squared in miles. Divide the result by 12 to get the apex in feet.
See chart >>9468042


Just over 24 miles long.
Almost 1/1000 the circumference of the ball Earth.
No scientific proof a body of water holds a convex shape.
How many flat and level surfaces does it take to make a sphere?

Only thing flatter than the Earth is Metabunk.org/Soundly's 2 dimensional towers.

>>9474833
There some nice aerial shots as well
You may have to adjust your search
>>9476126

>>9476171
>>9476126
>>9473764
>>9473756
>>9473754
>>9473750
>>9473740
>>9473693
>>9473669
>>9473664
>>9473656
>>9473573
>>9473565
>>9473558
>>9473519
>>9473515

>desperately spamposts in an attempt to make it look like he has more evidence than he actually does.

I'm sorry to tell you this anon but the picture is real and there's nothing you can do about it. transmission lines just look flatter the further away from you they are, since all the transmission line photographs are zoomed in a lot. I know that you are trying your best to prove that the obvious example of earth's curvature is somehow fake because you want to keep believing in your fantasy at all costs, but there's just nothing else to it. If you really are to confident that it's fake then call up a friend and get them to take a picture for you. nobody's blocking it. tons of people go there to check for themselves.

the earth is round and you don't want to admit it.

>>9472129
wtf i love trigonometry now

>>9473669
>>9473664
>>9473656

do you seriously not understand that they're using altitude, and not some absolute reference frame as a measure of height? how do you think they got such a accurate measurement of Kansas anyway?

hint: altimeters, which measure the ALTITUDE of a point.

im having trig class right now lmao

>>9476245
Metabunk/Soundly's photos are clearly 2 dimensional and half the metal structure is not present.

There are photographs of them going back more than 50 years and even in the the oldest ones taken at distance you can see the third dimension.

You should post examples from Metabunk/Soundly. There are numerous as well as real photos to compare.

What s the name of the scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water can maintain a convex shape?

>>9476245
While your googling the name of scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water can hold a convex shape and dosen t find and maintain a level surface you can point out where the 380+ foot curvature apex is in photography of the bridge in the same lake as those 2 dimensional towers.

>>9476347
I understand the situation in Kansas.
None of the curvature math for the ball Earth applies to the real world. That s the point of doing it.

What s the name of the scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water such as a lake or the ocean can maintain a convex shape. It s worth a google.

See >>9476595

>>9476245
There are way to many real photos to compare to the fake 2 dimensional tower photos, of which there are plenty, not to mention the videos. Multiple angles. 2 dimensions.

>>9476585
did you not see my image? in all pictures of transmission lines, the far away ones start appearing as if they are just paper cutouts. you need to realize that the pictures of the power lines over the lake are all zoomed in, so you are looking at just the far away ones. see this image? see how the farther away they get the more two dimensional they seem to be? no matter how much you want the hundreds of photos and videos taken by regular people to be fake, they're not fake. go there yourself and see.

and what's your obsession with a scientific experiment proving that water CAN be convex? you've already proven at this point that even in the presence of extremely compelling evidence you simply will not accept what is obviously true.

and i don't understand where you think you're getting by posting about four separate replies that each say about the same thing.

>>9476616
It's right there, retard.

Name me one (uno) trigonometric function that you actually NEED other than sin.

>>9476812
arcsin

>>9476812

cos

>>9476854
you mean the inverse of sin?
>>9476860
you mean sin(x + pi/2)?

>mfw people are arguing for flat earth on sci

Seriously though. If there earth were flat there wouldn't be timezones and you'd see the sun from all parts of the earth.

Not to mention: if the earth were flat, why hasn't anybody taken a picture of America from Mt. Everest? Or seen all areas of the earth at once from 1 high point for that matter?

>>9476982

No I mean cos.

>>9477042
I'm pretty sure it's only one guy arguing for flat earth. All he does is spam videos and images instead of actually making points himself, and even if you debunk something he posts he'll just post it in another thread anyway.

>>9477054
That clears it up. I've seen some stupid stuff on this board, but I was seriously disappointed when I saw stuff on flat earth.

>>9465134
Exactly the opposite. Trigonometry and proportions are, along linear function, the most useful thing for day2day life right after most basic operations like sum and multiplication, and before quadratic function. Obviously you never programmed anything more complex than website, which any code-monkey can do, never built anything, never stalked anyone, never used a map or planned/designed anything that has any rotational movement. You're just brainlet thinking it's shit, but the truth is you are too stupid or shallow to be able to understand it or find any use for it, and you life is so boring and shallow you don't do anything creative.

>>9477042
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective

>>9477042
>>9477151

https://youtu.be/_vlCmLxDng4

>>9476620
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Scientific+experiment+proves+convex+water

>>9476585

>>9466603
> Pretending to know anything about signal processing while saying "complex numbers are garbage"

I really hope you don't have an EE degree

>>9476812
nothing

>>9477059

>I'm seriously disappointed that people aren't blindly believing the heliocentric model which is a load of sci-fi bullshit that only 10 year old retards actually believe.

>>9477168
the scientific experiment is the picture, retard. which you've desperately tried to disprove and made yourself look like a fool in the process.

>>9477984
you have a severely warped view of reality if you're being serious.

>>9465134
Molarity is. A method of concentration that is useless unless you know the molar mass.

>>9478455
>warped view of reality

You think the sun is 93 million miles away and orbiting the galaxy at 600,000mph. Are you off your fucking meds or what?

>>9465190
fucking pedo

>>9478488
So, what's the point of making people believe that?
Also, Occam's Razor

>>9478488
and each of those facts are scientifically provable.

the alternative view, however, has literally zero evidence supporting it. how plausible something is does not decide weather or not it is true.

>>9478484
Molarity is useless now, but it came from a time when mass couldn't be measured precisely

>>9465190
Why the pedophilia?

Is this the trigonometry thread?


https://youtu.be/1X_Tw27wWv0

>>9467313
Wtf did I just read

>>9473693

>What s the name of the scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water can hold a convex shape?

Here you gou: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtU_mdL2vBM

>>9476812
arctan, in pretty much the same way you “need” the lambert W, or erf.

>>9476585
Pouring water inside a concave container, such as a glass. What do you think “convex” means?

>>9479823

See >>9477168

>>9480017
>>9479823
Trigonometry and the natural properties of water prove the Earth is flat.

See >>9479720

>>9479778

Are you fucking retarded? Can you not read? He is clearly saying his dad is a Hollywood store.

>>9480021
A water drop sitting on a table is round.

Please don't kill yourself when this little bit of information destroys your entire world view. Seek help.

>>9480051

Not an accurate analogy. The oceans are conforming to the surface of a solid oblate spheroidiandonianan. Water droplets on a table are clearly not doing this.

>>9480051
Surface tension is not the same thing.
Please link your citation that a body of water such as a lake or an ocean can maintain a convex shape through surface tension. It is practiclly observable that it s not so.

>>9480021

>>9480051
Surface tension is not the same thing.
Please link your citation that a body of water such as a lake or an ocean can maintain a convex shape through surface tension. It is practically observable that it s not so.

>>9480021

>>9476812
Sinh

>this thread

>>9480376
>>9480371
>>9480021
>>9480017

why the fuck is it so hard to understand that a literal photo of curved water superceeds the need for a controlled experiment? the water is obviously curved in the photos i posted.

it's like i post a picture of a green apple, and you go "yeah well what's the scientific experiment that apples can be green???"

the idea that you need a scientific experiment to verify what is obviously shown in numerous photographs is completely preposterous. we already KNOW the earth is round, and that knowledge can be used to INFER that the water is curved. the fact that we can see right there that the damn water is indeed curved just further supports the notion that the earth is round. you don't need to prove the fact that what you can plainly see is indeed possible.

>>9480017
That older post tells me little. A body of water which is perfectly flat (and lies inside of a container shaped correctly, if you want to be pedantic) is still convex. Perhaps you meant to say “curved”?

>>9480371
>>9480021

>>9479784

>>9480896
Because a body of water doesn't maintain a convex shape
A scientific experiment doesn't exist to prove it and won t because how would water stand on top of itself? It would flow and find it s natural level.
The real Earth is covered in 70% water.
Baal Earth is just a meme.
Once the real science bros here realize the facts about water, they ll notice that the only proof that can be offered are fake cgi pictures.

That's why Metabunk.org/Soundly need fake 2 dimensional copy pasta towers to "prove" convex water exists.

Of course it s observable near the ground, but then disappears from real aerial photography, and then re appears in NASA CGI footage.

The real Earth is flat and Baal earth is a meme.
The natural properties of water prove it.
Everyone is going to figure it out.

Metabunk/Soundly should have spent more time on their CGI models cause it s the thing that is going to point it out to everybody who can think critically.

>>9479196
Why the pedophobia?

>>9482057

>>9482057
>>9482061

>>9482057
>>9482061
>>9482064
https://youtu.be/cy6CFTMnYa4

>>9465134
>the most useless thing ever
... is shitposting on /sci/, as you have done, Anon.

>>9465134
>>9480896

This should be a new law, "Any debate about science will inevitable bring up the Flat Earth." It's like fucking Godwin's Law for scientists.

>>9482064
awww cute birb family

>>9480896

>>9482071
>Convex bodies of water which can t be proved scientifically, standing on top of themselves, while making flat horizontal horizon lines as far as observable
>Only proof offered are CGI pictures the latest of which have 2 dimensional copy pasta towers showing the one way convex water is observable near ground level, which then disappears from all real aerial photography and then reappears in NASA CGI photos

Critical thinkers are going to figure it out
And trigonometry will be a useful tool for them to help figure out the real Earth is flat and Baal earth was just a meme

See
>>9477168
>>9482057
>>9482061
>>9482064
>>9482066

This thread gave me cancer.

>>9482094
50+ years of real photos of those towers on Google images
2 dimensional copy pasta missing half the structure


>>9482099

>>9482094
>>9482099
>>9482107

>>9482107
You remind me of someone. Is it you andreas?

who would win? flat earthers or an inaccurate flat map projection?

who would win? flat earthers or 4 lead balls?

who would win? flat earthers or 1 mirror?

why can't gook moot ban all users who access /x/ from coming to /sci/?

>>9482151
This isn't /x/, this is just blatant shitposting. All we need is for the mods to actually do their jobs and ban the fucker.

>What s the name of the scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water can maintain a convex shape?

If dubs, this becomes the new /sci/ meme

>>9482151
Go fuck yourself, sometimes they speak more rational on X than here./

>>9482057
>>9482094
>>9482107
>>9482099

I cannot understand how you are able to continue to believe something despite being shown obvious examples to the contrary.

You were confused for a while about how curvature could be visible at ground level but not from above. i EXPLAINED IT TO YOU. YOU ACCEPTED THE EXPLANATION. however, you apparently just forgot about it and went right back to your original view. how in the world could you just forget something like that?

i am astounded at the lengths you will go to to defend your warped world view, even in the face of concise and obvious evidence to the contrary. Why do you claim that the towers are fake paper cutouts when i showed you that that's just what towers look like when you're facing them roughly head on and they're very far away? I showed you numerous pictorial examples of towers appearing flattened as they get further and further away but apparently you just forgot (?) that you saw them? I am beginning to think you actually have a serious problem with your memory. you seem to be just forgetting times you were obviously shown to be incorrect.

and additionally, you seem to be holding two contradictory views simultaneously. you seem to be on one hand denying the curvature, chalking it up to a mirage (despite the fact that mirages over water decrease curvature) and also claiming that the images are fake. you have two contradictory explanations on your hands and yet you peddle them as if they're both equally true.

I stick my mirrors on the wall using pitagoric theorem

>>9482121
https://youtu.be/vVX-PrBRtTY

1945 world air map
Worth a google

>>9478488
is every animal out in the nature doing shit to please you?
what if the squirrel forgets their nuts.
what if the sun is orbitting a galaxy
what does it matter to nature what a human thinks about it.
it just happens.
just look at basic geometry and wave physics (doppler shifts specially) to understand why we know the stuff we know.

>>9480376
why are all your "diagrams" so shitty?
you don't need to frantically copy and paste shit in paint to make us believe your bullshit

>>9482057
explain to me how you have internet and gps. im intrigued as to how you think we can keep those satellites up there if the earth is flat

>>9482612
There is no curvature. Especially the water. There no scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves water can maintain a convex shape. How would it stand on itself with out flowing and leveling out?
All the word play, double think and double speak in the world won t change the natural properties of water.

Any interested critical thinker is going to start measuring the X axis in aerial photography and where they live and discover that the Baal earth math is a meme and the real Earth is flat.

8 inches x Distance squared in miles.

I ve given them all the resources they need. They re doing it right now. They don t even have to leave the computer.
>>9468042
>>9473573
>>9479720
>>9468042
>>9473693
>>9482111
>>9480021

>>9482666
Nah man, satellites don't exist. Magic signals are sent from computers and reach servers all around the world, which distribute them uniformly and envelop our world in a magic shroud. Thus the internet is actually a giant magic web where all sorts of essences flow and pass by.

>>9482653
>just look at basic geometry and wave physics

That's not how science works I'm afraid. It must begin with observation first rather than only looking at mathematics and concluding things based on that. Mathematics is a language that can be used to describe whatever you want.

>>9482666
Nice trips
I have my GPS to my friend Indian t really use it much

I pay the I Bill and it keeps coming through the internet pipes.

I hear airplanes don t use gps over the ocean
https://youtu.be/6PfIBtjRBIY

>>9482672

>>9482677
> that is not how science works
HYPOTHESIS
TESTING HYPOTHESIS
OBSERVATION
PROCESSING
REMOVE HYPOTHESIS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVEN WRONG, TRY DISPROVING THE OTHERS
RINSE AND REPEAT.
what you are doing is this:
you see around you
looks flat
therefore it is flat
then you go and gather evidence to your belief, instead of trying to prove it wrong.
all the people in this thread are giving you good arguments as to why it is wrong, but you just ignore tham and continue with your confirmation bias. what you are doing is closer to assuming then building from that assumption without testing if your assumption is real.
maths is built upon logic. you can't say whatever you want on maths (except fucking statistics). 2 + 2 is not fucking 3. of that we know because when we lift 2 finger in one hand and lift two fingers in the other hand and count them we get 4 finger, not 3. In this way we can build upon proven result to make more complicated claims, whiuch need to be tested with our previously aquired axioms

>>9482675
https://youtu.be/oM5fKcU5ClI

>>9482672

>>9482702
I was joking, buddy. I know how they used to recover spy satellites.

>>9482687
you do know that they use more than one system of locating themselves. they have at least 5. GPS is one of them. reason being that if one fails they have the other. Your system is used not to locate the airplane, as stated in the video, it is to keep the pilots from crashing into each other. planes fly really fucking fast, and pilot reactions are not enough to help them. that is why you have the towers at airports to aid the pilots. out in the ocean there is sometimes zero visibility, so planes need a stablished safe method to both save fuel and avoid other planes. if they were all allowed to fly as they want, using inly gos and sattellite communication then there would be a lot more crashes.

>>9482687
also, in the malaysian airplane it is believed and known that many of the tracking systems in the plain either failed or were deactivated deliberatelly. thus making it much harder to find the wreckage, that is without counting sea currents and such

>>9465134
unironically yes
it's just algebra disguised as geometry

>>9482699

The earth looks flat, and measurements and observations confirm this. Kansas is flatter than a pancake for goodness sake, impossible on a spheroid.

>>9482702
https://youtu.be/hK_kWN0BsKs

>>9482639
still distorts shapes,

if there earth is flat surly you should be able to make a flat map with no distortion

>>9482729
20+ miles of missing curvature
All of the math is just a fictional model
Baal Earth is just a meme
>>9482672

>>9473693
>>9482672
>There no scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves water can maintain a convex shape
you fucking mongoloid of course there is
put some water in 0g, wait a bit and there you go
you can calculate yourself that this state is of the least energy, but you're probably too much of a brainlet who never even took calculus

>>9482742
When do we all get to go to "Space" to confirm? When you get it it set up come back and let us know when we leave.
I can't wait to see the stars from up there

https://youtu.be/OmcwW-8CC6E

>>9482672

>>9482790
see, I can throw all the evidence at you but you're too autistic and dismiss whatever the opposing argument is, continuing with your autistic screeching

>>9482790
here, you played yourself

>>9482790
>>9482803
Can't even answer anymore