/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9356369
Just don't. No one cares. There will always be retarded people, and as long as these retarded people have no power in the real world, just let them be retarded.

>>9356372
It just feels sad that some people don't believe an accomplishment of this magnitude ever happened

>>9356382
Why is it sad huh? I don't feel sad. I can feel the amusement of it because I know it is true. Why should I care about what other people think?

Why do you care? Are you sure this is really about showing other people the truth? Or is it more about you stroking your ego by showcasing to other people how much you know that they don't. Here's an idea: stop. Just because your penis is too small to stroke, that doesn't mean you have the right to be stroking your ego instead. Just don't. Just stop caring.

Stop lecturing people on the internet about shit that doesn't matter. Nobody really cares. Because every time you try to lecture people about such obvious things, you just come off as smug. You sound like you are someone with no power in real life who does not have the intelligence to be heard by the people in their life, so they have to compensate that by pretending they are know it alls on the internet. Just don't. Just stop. STOP.

>>9356384
Really hope you realize the irony

>>9356392
Yeah, I know I am lecturing you. But if my lecture reduces the number of retarded moon landing threads made in /sci/ then I will have made a positive contribution to the world.

The same goes for climate change and round earth shit. If something is so obviously true, let's stop discussing it. It is boring.

>believe america landed on the moon using tinfoil ship
>insult those who don't by calling them tinfoilers

lmao

>>9356369
By reflecting radar off the moon and getting a really good signal back because there's a radar reflector on the moon

>>9356369
Sadly, there IS no way.
No amount of evidence can over-ride a firmly closed mind.

Look at all the flat-earthers on /sci/. That nuttiness is a lot easier to disprove.
You can argue with them.
You could telephone someone in another time zone and ask whether the Sun was in the sky.
You could fly or sail them around the world.
Nothing helps.

>>9356396
...........

>>9356384
Lol@the_paragraph_of_projection

>>9356369
The space shuttle never flew to the moon, not even once and you want me to believe 60s space tech got men on the moon. AHAHAHAHAHAHA

You are one crazy sob.

>>9356415
Big deal, HAMS can do that too without any man made reflector.

>>9356415
>it takes human beings walking on the moon to put some equipment there

>>9356567
It proves the we went to the moon and HAMS can do that?

>>9356570
more believable than robots in the 1960s

>>9356396
You're such a traitor to humanity, worse than a politician and their lies.

>>9356574
It proves nothing.

>>9356574
Moon bounce.

>>9356369
There's no point when you've conditioned yourself to be so accustomed to a particular thought that there is such a great cognitive dissonance that the entire system would need a huge shock, something so mindbogglingly true, in plain terms for them to understand and process.

even then it is so easy to refute with some bullshit pseudoscience they can spew up that it's not even worth trying.