[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 66 KB, 520x705, avrg asian girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9334592 No.9334592 [Reply] [Original]

>CNN piece on global warming
>oy greenland is melting! the ice is disappearing!!!
>30mins of fearmongering about manmade warming
>"evidence suggests that the amount of melting is actually equivalent to new ice formation each year....but this is an anomaly... :) "
>back to fear mongering about CO_2 levels for 15more minutes

KEK

>> No.9334596

>>9334592

You're one of those people that hates breathing clean air right?

>> No.9334605

>>9334596
You're the one who likes making strawmen right?

>> No.9334647

>>9334592
Why do retards like you even bother posting on science boards? Serious question.

>> No.9334653
File: 127 KB, 601x508, 1511901912249.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9334653

>>9334647

>> No.9334805

Why are you even watching CNN?

>> No.9334813

>>9334805
I have no excuse for this

>> No.9334833

Back to your containment zone.

>> No.9334840
File: 237 KB, 551x506, 1511994349402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9334840

Sage goes in all fields. Do not bump shill/disinformation/psyop threads. Do me a favor and kys OP

>> No.9334843

>>9334840
the irony

>> No.9334851

>>9334840
>Forgot to sage
Fuck it, carry on OP

>> No.9334967
File: 229 KB, 520x519, 1505266259598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9334967

>OP points out specific thing
>shitpostings ignore science and instead attack the poster
and I'm supposed to obey you climate cultists why?
pls use science, is good

>> No.9334979

>>9334967
Op did not direct us to a single published scientific study or even whatever segment on CNN he was talking about. He is dismissing an entire established field because some retarded writer on CNN either wrote a story on the wrong study, interpreted it wrong, or stated information in such a way that op was too dense to understand. There is literally nothing to refute or debate in the op.

>> No.9334986

>>9334592
>oy
why the anit-semetism?

>> No.9335011
File: 132 KB, 1229x581, three little boards.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9335011

sage and ignore, people. he's fishing in empty waters.

>>9334592
>>9334986
>oy
/pol/acks are incredibly bad at not sounding like /pol/acks. easily detected when they start shitting up other boards for the simple reason that they aren't really capable of independent thought and just repeat their worn-out list of tropes over and over. hence, the omnipresent assumption that (((someone))) is behind it all.

>> No.9335031

>>9334986
Oy Hoye

>> No.9335053

>>9334592
>The integrity of an entire field of human knowledge, should be judged solely on the source-less greentext of a /pol/tard's interpretation of a possibly non-existent CNN news article.
Please fuck off and don't come back.

>> No.9335095

>>9334592
https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

>> No.9335410

>>9335095
>skepticalscience
Tbqh these people are political activists and should not operate under the banner of science. The big problem I have with this is that in the climate change debate the scientific results are in fact no longer neutral when done by activists and this makes the incredibly complex field of climate science even more difficult to understand and to separate facts from fiction.

>> No.9335414

>>9334805
This is what actually concerns me.
Can someone explain to me how CNN is still a thing in this day and age? How is something that has been proven to be trash and fake time and time again still exist?