/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9286781
[math]\frac{1}{2} < \lfloor\bmod{(\lfloor\frac{y}{17}\rfloor2^{-17\lfloor x \rfloor - \bmod{(\lfloor y\rfloor, 17)}}, 2)}\rfloor[/math]

Tupper's self referential formula. One because it's a cool formula and two because I just wanted something to practice writing in LaTeX with.

>>9286795
Also, it's technically not an equation. Sorry bout that.

1=2^(1/2)

t. Howard

[eqn]\frac{e^{i\pi}}{12}=1+2+3+ ...[/eqn]

>>9286818
kek

>>9286818
Underrated

a^2+b^2=c^2

https://groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Class_equation_of_a_group

cuz its crazy how it works and i just learned it

The equation that converts human time to Amerifat time: [math]t_A \equiv t \mod \frac{e^{i\pi}{\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty n}[/math]

[math]t_A \equiv t \mod \frac{e^{i\pi}}{\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty n}[/math] from white man's time to Amerifat time.

>>9286878
>>9286858
how to spot the newfags

>>9286799
I don't get it

>>9286781
That isn't true for any f.

>>9286781
[math] \int _{\partial \Omega} \omega = \int _{\Omega} d\omega [/math]

>>9286781
its basic but it is important https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/Sample_Projects/Ohms_Law/v%3Dixr.GIF

[math] [X, Y] = -[Y, X] [/math]

>>9287660
[math] [[X,Y],Z] + [[Y,Z],X] + [[Z,Y,X]=0[/math]

>>9287665
fuck ive got it wrong in the last commutator, gonna an hero now im so sorry boiz

>>9287613
http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/terrence-howards-dangerous-mind-20150914

>>9287668
It's fine, desu. Operator algebra is tricky.

>>9286781
[eqn]^\dagger\mathcal{HT}^{\Theta^{\pm\textrm{ell}}}=(^\dagger\mathfrak{F}_\succ\;\overset{^\dagger\psi_\pm^{\Theta^{\pm}}}{\longleftarrow} \; ^\dagger\mathfrak{F}_T\; \overset{^\dagger\psi_\pm^{\Theta^{\textrm{ell}}}}{\longrightarrow} \; ^\dagger\mathcal{D}^{\circledcirc\pm})[/eqn]

>>9288229
WTF is this anon?

>>9288265
The definition of a [math]\Theta^{\pm\textrm{ell}}[/math]-Hodge theater, found in 6.11(iii) of the first paper of Inter-universal Teichmüller theory by S. Mochisuki, the biggest mathematical meme at least of the last half century
Released in 2012, the four IUT papers still aren't verified, even though they proclaim to prove the abc conjecture
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory%20I.pdf

>>9288280
>http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory%20I.pdf
WOW dude i know maths..basically in a grad level.. and yet i understand completely nothing of that

>>9288295
better get cracking then, see the prerequisites as stated by the author
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/216184/a-road-to-inter-universal-teichmuller-theory
these notes seems like a more reasonable introduction to some of the concepts than mochisuki's overly typographically-complex mess
https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/notesoniut.pdf
otherwise you might just wait 20 years or so when the papers are understood better and have been simplified for a broader mathematical community

>>9288309
what field does this belong to?

>>9288311
Hard to say, the theory is so abstract and different from anything else, based on a lot of Mochisuki's earlier work like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabelian_geometry
But if I, an at-best amateur mathematician mostly fascinated by the inability of actual mathematicians to understand it, had to classify it, I'd say it's abstract algebra and number theory

[math] \chi(X,E)=\int_X \text{ch}(E)\text{td}(X) [/math]

1 = 1

>>9287283
The only people to care about newfags here are newfags themselves, stop trying to revive this shitty meme and go back to /b/

>>9288382
Not if you're Jewish.

M=mol/L

>>9288365
First descent one so far.

v=2c

>>9286781
0!>0

Apparently this breaks people's brains. Since when did the human mind become so fragile?

>>9287660
[0, 0!] = -[0!, 0] This is an example.

>>9288265
Really? That's just the Mathematician way of saying, "Hello, Friend."

>>9286781
thats the shittiest Laplace transform notation ive seen

>>9286781
2+2=4
4-1=3
quick maffs

sinx=x