/sci/ - Science & Math

SHAME THE CISGENDER!
SHAME
SHAME
SHAME

How ironic of you to do you transgender ABOMINATIONS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>9230293
None because he's the principal of the fucking school not Santa Claus

Two boy toys. Santa's ho-ho-horny this year.

>>9230532
why is that woman dresses in spandex from head to toe

>>9230293
you ever think that this comic strip is for trans people.

sure its a bit demonizing.

prenatal hormonal conditions cause the brain to develop like that of a heterosexual of the opposite biological sex

the human instinct to gain social dominance results in these outliers becoming targets for people's hubris

demagogues then exploit their fears and develop irrational theories about why this happens

the utilitarian thing to do would be to just give kids a range of toys and let them do their thing

>>9230658
>I dont understand utilitarianism
If you can only give 1 toy to each kid, which scenario would create the most overall happiness,

A: You give gender neutral toys to each kid (not a bad toy, but they won't find it relatable)

B: Give a toy that is related to their biological sex (Cars and action figures for boys, dolls and house stuff for girls)

By picking A its the equivalent of cutting off 10000 peoples fingers to prevent 1 person from dying.

>>9231529
By utilitarianism logic, you should determine which single kid gets the most happiness from getting a toy and then give all of the toys to him

utilitarianism is flawed to the core anyway, who gives a fuck

>>9231536
Now youre thinking like a true philosophical patrician.

>>9231541
>t. Religious sheep
EVERYTHING SHOULD BE REDUCED TO PURE RATIONALITY REEEEEEEEE

>>9231547
go visit a doctor, you don't seem alright

>>9230293
>you are alive just in time to witness the suicide of the author

>>9231529
>By picking A its the equivalent of cutting off 10000 peoples fingers to prevent 1 person from dying.
Yeah, giving away neutral toys is equal to cutting of people's fingers

Thanks for the insight /pol/

>>9230293
0, why would the principal need to buy toys for his students?

>>9231647
It shows that many minor inconveniences can be worse than a singular tragedy.

>>9231601
Is this true? How do you know?

>>9231798
>40% of trannies kill themselves
it's a safe bet

>>9231547
Utilitarianism is self-defeating; trying to get people to follow a utilitarian-based ethics/legal system in and of itself makes people in general unhappy.

>>9231547
>you're either religious or utilitarian
no

>>9231903
>40%
>safe bet

>>9231647
Its not equivalence, it's analogy. I'm a tranny and I agree with it. Stop calling everything you disagree with pol

>>9231647
>Not understanding philosophy

saying go back to /pol/ barely has any power anymore, is a meme at this point

>>9231529
>>9231647
>not being a chad utility monster

>being a virgin philosophical zombie

the only moral thing to do is to give everything you own to me

>>9230293
>99% of people are normal
>Be the cuck principal
>I bought fucking balls to everyone so no one gets disrespected
>The children all play a little, then toss the shit aside and continue doing shit
>did not offended anyone but no one really liked
>It costed 500$ to buy 44 balls
>No one gave a fuck
>Meanwhile the Chad professor gave the students fucking nothing
>The fucker even jokes and makes fun of the gifts
>Everyone laughts
>Whynoonelikesme.jpg

>>9231999
are you drunk

>>9231999
>>9232001
I just solved the problem faggot

>>9230532
This lol

>>9231970
>what are escalating odds

>>9230293
20 boys toys. Wasnt that hard.

>>9230632
>why is that woman dressed

fixed

>>9231536
>implying there are no diminishing returns

>>9232165
ummmm.... EX-FUCKING-SCUSE ME??????????????????

these comics unnerve the shit out of me.

>>9231987
>Its not equivalence
>>9231529
>its the equivalent
:thinking:

>>9230293
The answer is 20.

>>9232434
hey, you know how analogies work? they re-contextualize ONE similarity, the similarity being sacrificing the needs of the many for the few. Toys also aren't fingers, but the analogy still works, you retard

>>9231536
>implying happiness increases linearly with number of toys given
what you need to do is determine the happiness vs # of toys function for each child then run some analysis

Just give legos to everyone of them.
Everyone love legos.

>>9232165
>>9232436
You sillies have forgotten Mr. Sean, and the principal if they’re a boy. So 21 or 22.

>>9230293
44
But boy toys for each kid. Girl toys are lame.

>>9231529
>Give a toy that is related to their biological sex (Cars and action figures for boys, dolls and house stuff for girls)
Except there are no 'toys related to their biological sex', boys are given cars and action figures to play with because of cultural assumptions about what boys should enjoy playing with and thus they learn to enjoy playing with cars and action figures, and likewise for girls. Anyone that's had kids knows that young children will play with whatever you put in front of them with wild abandon, completely unaware of whether they 'should' or 'shouldn't' enjoy doing so.

>>9230293
No need to buy any boy toys. Ms Lucy and Ms Cheryl already have their boy toys i.e. the boys they fuck in their class. The principal is probably getting in on that too because principals all seen to be women now.

>>9231529
>implying toys inherently relate to someones biological sex
>implying people aren't socialized to find certain toys masculine or feminine
I don't see the problem with giving gender neutral toys.

>>9231529
They actually tried this. Turns out, gender neutral "raising" didn't "fix" anything. Girls still wanted to be hairdressers and boys wanted to be engineers...

>>9233582
>implying either of those things are false
you're looking at societal and historical trends and coming to the conclusion that those trends were arrived at through top-down conditioning and coercion, when in reality those trends came about BECAUSE there are innate predispositions to certain preferences and behaviours found in boys and girls caused directly by their sex

the behaviour, psychology, and physiology of males and females are different, and there is nothing any sociology or X-studies class you take in college can do to change that fact

>muh utilitarianism
This shit was literally SHAT on in the last century, why do you people spout this meme shit

just buy the boy/girl toys that are fun for either:
>cool cars with some pink cars too
>EZ bake oven and cabbage patch kids
>hungry hungry hippos

its not hard to buy toys which are fun for both sexes. femenists need to gtfo the classroom or im going to homeschool my kid.

>>9231970
>he doesn't play XCOM

>>9231947
Try rule based utilitarianism.
It accept that humans are retarded and you can't explain why every action is either good or bad or get into the nuances every time, so you have to make general rules to have shit function.
Or get past babbys first utilitarianism that says "hurr durr all trolley problems are the same" and accept that societal implications are a harm to be considered outside of just the harms of the event.

>>9234637
The problem with utilitarianism is trying to arbitrarily quantify the effects of events based on flawed assumptions.

>>9230293
slinkies for everyone

>>9231536

you forgot about the rule of diminishing returns. There is an optimal distribution somewhere.

>>9235136
>>9233272
>>9232234
>>9231542
you are all brainlets. >>9231536 is pareto optimal.

>>9230632
Why would you complain about that

>>9235153

This can be made into a math problem.

H(n) = the happiness of kid n
E(n) = the raw enjoyment factor for a single unit of toy per kid
T(n) = the number of toys given to kid n

H(n) = E(n)*log( T(n)+1 ) + E(n)

toys diminish in returns according to log(number of toys + 1) + 1. this is because getting one more toy when you only had one is a big deal, while getting one more when you already had 100 isn't. the additional happiness gained by one more toy is equal to the enjoyment gained by one toy divided by the total amount of toys, times the raw happiness gained by one toy on it's own. with some mental speeding ahead we get the formula happiness = E log(T+1)+ E, where E is the enjoyment gained by one toy on it's own and T is the number of toys.

The goal is to maximize the integral from zero to kid n of H(n), by altering T(n)

>>9233411
You cannot properly play a marriage if you do not have girl's toys. Well, you can, but you'll be missing out the most common type of marriage, and then some.

Realy, even when I was a child it always bothered me that male toys didn't include things like house appliances, woman, and more clothes variety. Action figures have a life too!

>>9234136
>anon posts some shitty text version of the trolley problem instead of the memetastic one

>>9233587
>they tried this
then show me you brainlet, why should I take your word for it, post the study

>>9230293
Dildos for everyone. Show them the wonders of being a woman

>>9235266
I forgot the name of the study, but you can search for it and I know it even has a wiki page. Basically, a vilalge in Israel decided to do that so they had a bunch of folks raise they children neutral. After these children found jobs they conformed more than average, boys were engineers and girls were just girls.

Still though, if you re offended by this for being a mentally disabled woman or something, then I suggest that you realize that you can still be a woman and an engineer.

>>9230293
Why are these people so mentally ill?
Why are people encouraging them?

>>9235462
you tell me, you replied to this thread drumpfkin

>>9235462
See pic related
>>9235466
>logic and reason here to stay
Also see pic related

I hear something like 40-50% of these basket cases off themselves. It's almost as if they're mentally ill or something.

>>9232178
thanks
>>9235170
was making a joke about the fact that the color of her skin makes it look like she's dresses in spandex from head to toe

but now I am afraid not many got the joke

>>9235488
>I hear something like 40-50% of these basket cases off themselves
That's because of bigots like you.

>>9230293
The answer is 44 boys' toys and 44 girls' toys, and let each child choose. It doubles your expenses, but you won't get sued, so it's better in the long run.

>>9230559
Underrated desu

>>9235459
It's sad when the Jews disproved modern SJWs decades ago

>>9230532
i want to [math]cum[/math] inside this nigress

>>9231529
>By picking A its the equivalent of cutting off 10000 peoples fingers to prevent 1 person from dying.
Which is perfectly reasonable for a utilitarian position. Utilitarianism is calculating the average happiness. Depending on how you calculate it then it can be reasonable. The happiness I experience for living is worth a million fingers so just cut them off.

>>9233313
If you're going to include teachers, you'd need to include all male teachers. You don't include teachers.

>>9235488
>It's almost as if they're mentally ill or something.
Trannies don't disagree that they're mentally ill, nor do most psychologists. The mental illness is called "gender dysphoria" and the treatment is HRT and SRS.