/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9056368
INTP here too. I agree with the functions more than the archetype

I fucking hate Fi users.

>>9056368
The Big Five are better.

>>9056393
What are those?

>>9056393
Just took the test, it's fucking trash.

>>9056368
INTP

>>9056368
Anyone with a "J" in there personality is mean.

>>9056466
>INFJs are mean
>ENFJs are mean
>fucking ESFJs are mean
>ISFJs are mean

>>9056441
it's not a test you retard

>>9056368
What are you, a fucking queer? A woman? Or some other kind of subhuman? This is horoscope tier garbage.

INFP

INTJ/INTP, depending on the test it seems. Sometimes even get almost 50/50 split for J and P

>>9056368
I think most people here will get INTP or one hamming difference

>>9056545
This honestly

INTJ reporting.

>ENTP
fuck you all

>>9056622
Get the fuck out, engineer normie.

ENFP

I got ESTP and it's not close whatsoever. Kinda disappointed desu senpai

INTP and some INTJ, there are quite a bit of INTPs in this thread.

You know this shit has been debunked eh

ENTJ
The master race of MBTI

>>9056368
I'm Aquarius, and it's pretty accurate too. I bet you must be a Libra or a Gemini?

>>9056368
INTP here too my friends.

>>9056368
ISTP > all

>>9056368
INTJ

INFJ, INTJ, ENTP, ENFP are the god tier personality types to have. ENFJ is also always helpful towards others, they're also there.

I don't know about others.

As for accuracy, just go to r/yourmbti and you'll find like minded people. It' essentially good enough, but people won't accept it unless it's 'literally perfect' because they're afraid and this is how they pretend to not be.

>>9056545
Pretty much

>>9056368
im a Taurus
i totatally agree it's scary accurate for me aswell

ENFP-T

>>9057321
People actually believe in horoscopes?

>>9057063
Why are those God tier?

Holy crap, is this a joke. Why do you all take this so seriously

>>9056368

Isnt the test re-test consistency on the meyer brigg only like 40%? Thats pretty dang poor. Also, is there any meaning in the result? Like to J people live longer, or act any different? Any meaningful connection to the results at all?

>>9056393
This ^

>>9056549
rare and gay personality type

>>9056368
This is worse and more normie than fucking IQ bullshit. Take your horoscope level bullshit to >>>/x/ kid.

>>9057063
>this is god tier?
>why?
>....because I don't know about the others, obviously these are god tier.

Brainlet logic at work.

>yes/no questions
>range of feeling answers
>many questions are actually illogical
>try several different online tests
>get different results on every one

I feel like something is off if none of these things match up together at least once. These questions are so vague and so few that there is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

https://youtu.be/Q5pggDCnt5M

OP btfo

INFP failure deep into depression.

INTP here as well

Have never got any other result but ENTP, was once literally amazed at how accuratly it describes me.

My ideal way of thinking would be INTP tho.

What do you think about ENTPs

>>9058565
Same as me with INTP.
Honestly, I think these tests are mostly shit, but INTP described me so accurately it was almost scary. Like, how could someone so accurately describe the way I am like that without ever meeting me?

>god tier

entj
enfj
estj
estp

>weirdo/smart but lazy/value intelligence tier

entp
intp
intj

>normie tier

anything i didn't say above

>suicide tier

infp
istp*

>>9058642
>suicide tier
>infp
>I am INFP 100% introvert
>please help

I went from INTJ to ENFP. How fucked is my brain?

>>9056368

i'm not taking any more quizzes from /sci/

>>9057783

MBTI test are a meme. However, Jungian psychology and Jung's study of cognitive functions is a lot more fun and interesting. The entire thing is obviously non-empirical, but regardless of that I think there's something to it.

>>9058642

>Throwing out INFJ and ENFP from weirdo/smart
You god damn barbarian.

ISTP
Pretty accurate

>>9058931

What would Jung say of INFP? Would he say I'm a faerie?

>>9058931
>Eclipse
Opinion discarded

All I know is that intuitives are significantly superior to sensors, and that's all I care about.

ISFP here.

Autistic social retarded INTJ reporting in.

>>9058642
Obviously, you have no clue how this scale works or what these really mean. Here's a hint, just taking the test means you are a normie.

>>9058023
This.

>someone thinks this is a "science"

>>9056368
Capricorn, chaotic neutral

is this bad or what

I always get ENTJ but I don't feel like an extrovert. I mean I'm outgoing and confident in social situations, but I find socialisation exhausting and prefer alone time to being around others so I don't think I qualify as an extrovert.

>>9059318
Couldn't agree more - I hate these threads so much. For a thread that's supposed to support science, people here sure do like using this pseudo-shit to feel good about themselves.
Saged.

>>9059325
That is where the questions, for the test, break down. For instance, I'm extremely introverted, but I have no qualms about going into the middle of a crowd, getting everyone's attention and talking to/asking questions. I just prefer not to. On the other hand, my friends, some of whom are extremely extroverted can't bring themselves to do anything like that.

Depending on what test I take, I'll get different results. The test writers' perception(s) of these things is the person who is judging you. Thus, each online test has a different judge. Some of the questions can be a bit vague too. Which can bork everything as a whole.

You just need to remember, you know who you are better than anyone else. If you want to fit into a category then research and compare traits yourself.

>>9056368
ENTP. Born to /pol/.

>>9056368
INTP here anon

ENTP, and the test is pretty awful
I get that it's supposed to be a catch-all but some of the questions are phrased so damn vaguely that there's no possible way I could answer anything but "neutral"
For instance, I came up as 70% extroverted and 30% introverted, and I can recall the exact questions that gave me that score, but the reality is that I'm a true introvert who only acts social because I've spent years emulating others' behaviors to get here
You can't possibly account for these things

>>9056368
ENTJ Extraversion (E), Intuition (N), Thinking (T), Judgment (J)

ENFP-T here. My biggest fear is to harm those I like
Second would be being alone or rejected by everyone
I'm pretty decent when it comes to understand other's feelings
This is a major weakness

I'd like to have other feedbacks from ENFP

>>9056368

MBTI has been debunked over and over again, it's literally just a horoscope invented by two women with zero scientific training and based on a single pop-sci book by New Age darling Jung. When anyone tells you their MBTI, you immediately know you're dealing with a moron.

http://www.indiana.edu/~jobtalk/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/develop/mbti.pdf

INTP here. I don't want to take an IQ test because it takes too long and I don't want to be dissapointed, I don't get why it menas so much to me.

>>9058565
>Have never got any other result but ENTP, was once literally amazed at how accurately it describes me.

Yeah pretty much same for me. I get that not everybody falls into one of the 16 types but I seem to be a textbook ENTP.

>>9058931
This is a lot more accurate than MBTI itself.

>>9059857
>>9058931
>HURR

Not a single thing Jung wrote is verifiable or factual, there's a reason why New Age is considered woowoo and not science.

>>9059863
I know that. MBTI is some sort of horoscope that has some accuracy in reality, not really due to science or fact.

>>9056368
INTP autistic genius master race reporting.

>>9056622
>>9056653
>>9057063
ENTP engineer masterrace reporting

It sure feels nice being smart with social skills.

>>9056368
>pop-sci bullshit that has been proved to steem from an misinterpretation of a concept from a highly non-scientific mystical psychologist

>>9056393
The Big Five is fucking shit mate. Fucking shit, I tell you. Who the fuck thought unhappiness/neuroticism could be considered a permanent personality trait. It's so full of shit, it makes me lose hope for psychology on the inside. You could at least have used the Big Six instead, which is way less revolting than that shit.

/sci/ only seems to use the shit part of Psychology. The 12 jungian archetypes are considerably more insightful than this baseless trash. Hell, even the 4 temperament personality theory are more interesting to measure personality traits than this.

I fucking hate you, /sci/.

>>9056368 (OP)
>pop-sci bullshit that has been proved a long time ago to be an misinterpretation of a concept from a highly non-scientific mystical psychologist

>>9056393
The Big Five is fucking shit mate. Fucking shit, I tell you. Who the fuck thought unhappiness/neuroticism could be considered a permanent personality trait. It's so full of shit, it makes me lose hope for psychology on the inside. You could at least have used the Big Six instead, which is way less revolting.

/sci/ only seems to use the shit part of Psychology. The 12 jungian archetypes are considerably more insightful than this baseless trash. Hell, even the 4 temperaments are more interesting for measuring personality traits than this.

I fucking hate you, /sci/.

Psychfag here to tell you all the mb is garbage to anyone who studies psychology.

these type of tests aren't horoscope tier, however you shouldn't take it as 100% accurate or scientific as because personalities are more complex than just mere labels but overall its fun to do and learn a bit more about yourself.

>>9056368
ENTJ master race reporting in

>tfw STEM chad

>>9056368
First, I consider it obligatory to point out that the Myer's Briggs is essentially a modern take on astrology, and that I don't consider it particularly valid. I need to say that so I don't come across as a retard.

Second, INFP most of the time, ENTP depending on my mood. I'm a pretty emotionally unstable guy to the point where I feel like I might be manic depressive or something, it really just depends on what mood I'm in.

>>9061530

I can understand emotional instability ; though depression is my main thing right now.

>>9056368
Cognitive functions test ((ie)Fi,Ni, etc) isa better measure cognitive functions.

>>9056368
>pop-sci bullshit that has been proven a long time ago to be an misinterpretation of a concept from a highly non-scientific psychologist
wew

>>9056393
The Big Five is fucking shit mate. Fucking shit, I tell you. Who the fuck thought neuroticism (which is basically unhappiness) could be considered a permanent personality trait. It's so primitive and so full of shit, it makes me lose hope for psychology on the inside. You could at least have used the Big Six instead, which is a bit less revolting. It oversimplifies personality as something expontaneous and unchangeable. It's not only useless, but also detrimental to anyone that takes it seriously.

The 12 jungian archetypes are considerably more insightful than this baseless trash. Hell, even the 4 temperaments personality theory is more pratical for measuring personality traits than this.

I fucking hate you, /sci/.

>>9057783
>>Isnt the test re-test consistency on the meyer brigg only like 40%?
Not wanting to defend Myers-Briggs, but
>implying personality doesn't change over time

I bet you're a physics fag.

>>9061750
>being this triggered about a post on a burmese copper smelting enthusiast forum

>>9057043
This, INTJ too, I remember being a kid and I used to have so much emotions. Now I only make decisions with my brain, which is all well and good, but what's the point of living if not to feel?

>>9059323
Yes you are now officially gay

this personality table is not scientifically proven

>>9061750

Do you have evidence that the big five is trash? I'm not well verse in psychology, and I'd like to know if Dr Peterson is just a meme or if he knows what he's talking about.

>have bipolar disorder
>take test under depression
INTP
>take test under mania
ESFJ

What do?

Last I did I got that I could be any of the following

INTJ
INTP
INFP
INFJ

Honestly the whole thing seems like mental masturbation. There's no value in these if you can just as easily identify yourself as any one you feel is what you should be, not what you really are

>>9061750
It is the personality test with the highest test retest reliability.

>>9056368
You retard this is just advanced horoscope bullshit
>some vague description
>OHHHHHHHH ITS SO ME AHHHH

>>9063023
this

>>9061750
Despite this,it is highly probable that some are just wired to have a higher dopamine or endorphin flow, therefore being naturally happier.

From that, there must be people who are just biochemically has a lower happiness capacity?

>>9063023
Custom tables are the juiciest, anyone got any more?

>>9058931
>tfw ISTP
>tfw have a social life and enjoy partying
>tfw haven't wanted to kill myself in over a year
Your move, normie

>>9056368
The tests only show what personality type you think of yourself as.

INFJ

Am i some sort of overcomplicated Jesus?

>>9063023
INTP "Once went one week without showering or going outside."

Kek. That's literally me in this summer vacation.

Math & Science > Sun & Water.

>>9059821
literally the same

>>9063212
That's pretty gross

introverted ENFP faggot here
Real answer:
Types are memes but the functions behind them help describe your preferential mode of though and what information you prioritise while looking at a subject/thing.

Big Five is a personality theory.
MBTI is a theory of modes of thinking or sth like that.

ISFJ here

Less accurate than a Buzzfeed quiz