/sci/ - Science & Math

do you really need to verification? sounds like common sense to me

It'd be difficult to properly verify, but it does make sense. A couple who has frequently is probably going to have:

1) A deep-rooted primal need satisfied well, making it easier to focus on more important things
2) Boosted confidence in day to day interactions from knowing there's someone they're important to
3) A reliable source of deep emotional support
4) Periodic deep stress reduction

…among other benefits, assuming a healthy relationship. You'd have to be pretty useless to be getting all of that and not deriving long-term benefit from it.

>>8889355
Oh I need to fuck that ass.

>>8889422
t. /sci/

>>8889355

Hypothesis: the more frequent sex is first of all an effect and not a cause of the couple being more successful, for the simple reason that the couple are healthier and more attractive, and consequently better able to get promotions, preferential treatment, leninency etc.

At some point these things may go into a positive feedback loop, but I won't go further beyond this general idea.

Roissy once cited an item which indicated that more attractive people have more gratifying sex. Imagine that. This is closely related to my above hypothesis.

>>8889357

Ninety percent of the time, scientific studies ultimately verify common sense. Another five percent of the time, the study is a sort of bogus and dubious nonsense which hopefully does not persist, but may manage do to so as some sort of a meme.

The remaining five percent of the time, the study concludes something weird or counter-intuitive which bears lots of scrutiny and forces us to adapt a bit. This is the important five percent, and it's what justifies the rote exercise of carrying out the above remaining ninety-five percent, even though the public can smirk at the many scientific studies which do, ultimately, merely confirm common sense. The public forgets the above five percent which I've just indicated.

>>8889355
This is not science. We can all observe that happy people fuck and people who fuck are happy.

My fiancee is a nympho.

I probably would not be with her otherwise.

>>8889441
Arn't nymphos hard to maintain control over?

Seems like they'd be super hard to satisfy leaving them to ride the cock train, woot, woot.

>>8889355
Can you stop making threads that are just poor excuses to post lewd images on a blue board?

too much fug = sex gets stale
t. virgin

>>8889355
I imagine the causation is inverted.

>>8890207
I'll stop posting one of the following if someone gets quads in this thread:

>race threads
>sexy image threads
>Chris Langan threads
>IQ threads
>flat earth threads

Yes, I am the main poster of these threads lol. /sci/ is the perfect board to swamp because it's just slow enough but not too slow.

>>8889355
I would think it is the other way round. Succesful couples have more sex.

why is the lady naked

>>8890128
>maintain control over

LMAO MR. VIRGIN

>>8889355
>3dPD

Do you know where you are?

>>8889355
Many people define success to be ability to acquire a satisfying sex life so it would not surprise me.

>>8889355
seems unhygienic...

Is it possible to lose your virginity at 24 if you can't even talk to people on steam?

>>8890277
Its unlikely

>>8890231
By the power of quads, I banish you!

>>8889441
t. future cuck

Use common sense sci for once.

People who have more sex have by definition less time for other endeavors, like studying, thinking, having discussions, making money etc.

The inherit disadvantage accumulates over time, thus they will likely not contribute or advance society in any major way, compared to the "virgins".

Now if you define success as having a wild sex life, raising kids, being wealthy and popular, maybe even running a non-profit organization, yes they are by this definition "successful".

However, real scientists and gentlemen will agree the only true path to success lies in the search for wisdom and knowledge, which unfortunately comes hand in hand with social isolation and intense anxiety.

Thanks for listening to me *tips fedora*.

>>8889402
this is a good post have a frog sir

>>8890231

>>8888888

>>8889355
its more like frequent sex is an indicator of a healthy relationship.

sex is the canary in the coal mine for a marriage.

>>8890231
I do not need quads to banish you brainlet.

>>8890231
if my post is >>8891155
add "steel cant melt beems" to your list

>>8890231
Race threads please

>>8889355
Why would you bring this Cosmo bullshit to /sci? For one thing, there's implied but completely unproved causation...and that's just the start of your downfall. Think before you post or better yet, kys.

>>8889355
Me and my ex used to have sex all the fucking time, guess what, shes my ex.