/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8870571
I'm white and have a 9 inch wang, I'd say I'm about average for whites.

I'm black, its about 7" which is pretty normal. But OP is a faggot since he is interested in dicks.

Black men have the biggest and thickest penises.

Remember that cute thicc girl you liked? She can only be properly pleased by a BBC.

>>8870594
Yes but is it fact? If so why? It only really serves vanity

>>8870590
>>8870593
lol yall so small. mine is at least 6 times that.

>>8870599

Natural selection cuck boi.

Females prefer manlier and bigger penises, hence they gravitate towards the black ones.

Also they can properly insert sperm, meaning the negro has superior breeding capabilities.

>>8870602
>Females prefer manlier and bigger penises, hence they gravitate towards the black ones.
They gravitate towards the bigger ones because of the mass, not because of interest.

>>8870602
But genetically why do black cultures have bigger ones, I mean as humans we all evolve in the world, why would their race get it bigger. It makes no sense. It's not like they predicted further competition and evolved that way to stick out

>>8870616

evolution is part of the cultural marxist agenda to make people believe such non sense.

The answer to this is simply that, evolution is fake

>>8870571
Yeah, research has shown that white penises are actually to small to even feel by the average women. In fact, they are so small that many researchers see that white "men" are closer to females than to males and should all be chemically sterelizied and have their entire body be repurposed for the pleasure of black men.

>>8870616
That's because black people and white "people" are not of the same race.

That is why, for example, horse penises are much bigger than human penises. They are a different species.

Well, the same happens with whites and blacks. Blacks are human and evolved in a certain way. Whites can be traced genetically to see that they are actually a subhuman species that is closely related to us humans but just not the same. As for why white subhumans did not grow more their penises is probably because since ancient times, female whites noticed that black men were the superior race and just fucked the black men, ignoring their own white race. Therefore the men got no action and eventually started de-evolving their penises. If you let this process go for a couple extra thousands of years white men will completely lose their penis and it will become a vagina so the white race will be an auxiliary race meant only to be slaves of the superior black human.

>>8870636
Alright then anon, you start.

>>8870648
Nice try, /pol/tard.

>>8870571
>another pathetic cuck bait thread

sage

>actual answer

Yes and no

Over time women have picked men with larger dicks to have sex with. We can see this as a trend over time human dick sizes have increased.

Studies have also shown that black penises are slightly larger but not statistically significant. So yes and no.

Regardless women have, on average, average sized vaginas made for average sized dicks. Some have larger vaginas and may prefer a larger penis.

all in all. considering the facts. you're a gigantic faggot OP

>>8870571
Yes.

>>8870761
>rushton

>>8870839
This is you.

>>8870571
i'm black, have a 9x6 bbc, a 145 iq, and i make more than you

no, we are not equal. i am superior to you.

>>8870616
>But genetically why do black cultures have bigger ones

Because God fucked up their hair...

>>8870571
[math]x^2 + y^2 = \sqrt((1+x)*(1-x)*3*y)[/math]


Pretty much sums it up.

>>8870571
Indian here. It's about 5.1"

>>8870727
Nigger

>>8870571
The current best data points towards there being no significant difference between races.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full

The authors note, however, that they would like better, and more, data before drawing any firm conclusions.

>>8870602
Lol...such poor logic. Chinese people have reputedly smaller dinkies than nignogs, but they clearly have the superior-est breeding capabilities. This shit-posting/race-baiting needs to go back to /pol and /b where it belongs. Morons go home.

It's funny how liberals love saying that blacks have larger penises to spite white people while denying that whites are more intelligent despite proof to the contrary. (((Science))), everyone.

Of course there are going to be slight differences in general

I don't know why people think 30,000-60,000 years of divergent evolution isn't going to produce some kind of minor demonstrable effect

>>8873724

Yes, but only in penis size goy. Not in IQ! that would be raciss.

>>8871034

Why does someone with an IQ of 145 write like a kindergarten?

>>8870571
OP, you have to go to higher latitudes to truly test the cellular nucleus' fibre.

When a species in in dire need of mutative experience, it will select for bolder fertility.

You can see clearly that when species-wide developmental thresholds are approached (as in the case of far-east Asians and northern Europeans), to say nothing of environmental climatic factors, it's likely that the biological system will begin to redistribute extremely expensive resources beyond the baser fleshy, tissue vessel and closer to the nucleus, right?

>>8870571
OP, you have to go to higher latitudes to truly test the cellular nucleus' fibre.

When a species is in dire need of mutative experience, it will select for bolder fertility.

You can see clearly that when species-wide developmental thresholds are approached (as in the case of far-east Asians and northern Europeans), to say nothing of environmental climatic factors, it's likely that the biological system will begin to redistribute extremely expensive biological resources beyond the baser fleshy, tissue vessel and closer to the nucleus, right?

>>8870571

>>8870571
OP, you have to go to higher latitudes to truly test the material of the cellular nucleus--after all, geography is rough, isn't it? "Unfair."

When a species is in dire need of mutative experience, it will select for bolder fertility. Members of that species will be forced to invest a disproportionate sum of its most valuable (neurological) resources into the question of reproduction because, of course, it is quite simply losing. The body knows when it is losing and the investment will not be simply neurological but organ-wise too.

In a teeth-and-claw fight, whether it's a forgone loss or not (it's never over until it's over), the architecture will still leverage its fingernails off the flesh on the cliff's edge; at that point, a smaller brain in exchange for a bigger bid to keep warm inside the womb instead of out in the cold is, as the dipshits say: a "no brainer."

You can see clearly that when species-wide developmental thresholds are approached (as in the case of far-east Asians and northern Europeans, to say nothing of environmental climatic factors,) it's likely that the biological system will begin to redistribute extremely expensive resources beyond the baser fleshy, tissue vessel and closer to the nucleus, right?

>>8874624
>write like a kindergarten
A kindergarten is a place, anon. It cannot write.

>>8876535
So if you write like one, that's pretty bad

>>8873719
Why do you retards just use the word "liberal" for anyone you disagree with like it means anything

>>8870648
Evolution does not reverse, cuk boi.

>>8870602
but black people have small ebola penises :( Not one porn poster goes without some photoshop enlargement kid

>>8876586
Liberal has become a blanket term for the right leaning in the usa, basically anyone with a dissenting opinion from them. Honestly I'm sure liberal meant something much different than how it is portrayed today.