/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8645349
no fag
get that /pol/ shit out of /sci/

>>8645349
found the /pol/ monkey

>>8645349
lolno

>>8645349
First you'd have to figure out what exactly an innate ability to dominate the environment would be, which would probably amount to intelligence, and no, we haven't been able to figure out what exactly intelligence might be.

And there are so many genes that we think affect intelligence, such as we currently define it, that nothing as simple as race can even come close to significantly affecting it.

>>8646513
Youre wrong.

>>8646525
They're not wrong. The closest people have come is using genome-wide polygenic scores to try to objectively measure stuff believed to be correlated with intelligence (like level of attained education).

Race is so shit tier it's actually worse than some pseudoscience approaches.

>>8646533
What you said has nothing to do with what that guy said.

>>8646536
You're wrong.

>>8645349
>specific genes related to European genetics which imply an innate superiority in ability to dominate the environment compared to other racial groups?

some genes include
double eye lids
tall nose

>>8646396
>>8646398
>everything i dont like is /pol/

>>8646582
>Genetic racism isn't /pol/

>>8646611
>genetics is science until it hurts my feelings

>>8646614
>lol you're just calling this /pol/ because you don't like it
>no it's very clearly /pol/
>yeah well it's right. So there.

>>8646614
Who said anything about science? Inserting the word genetic into your conspiracy theory doesn't make it science.

>>8646622
>scientific conspiracy theories
you're starting to sound like one of those climate deniers

>>8646623
>hurr durr funny frog meme
Go back

>>8645349
No.

PS:
>European
If you define your ability as intelligence we ought to be looking for any such genes in Asians first.

>>8646552
How...

Something something most common blood types per race
Something something innate immune systems