[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 457 KB, 1280x1731, alright alright alright.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8501117 No.8501117[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

tell me fuckers, which was scientifically correct - voting for trump or hillary?

>> No.8501121

>>8501117
WW3 means no more science so Trump was a good thing.

>> No.8501122

>>8501117
>trump thinks global warming is hoax and vaccines cause autism
you have to go back to /pol/

>> No.8501123

>>8501117
Americans might've been better off had Hillary won, but for the rest of the world Trump winning was a gift from heavens.

>> No.8501124

>scientifically correct
>politics
>based on moral
>moral is subjective

You can't objectively reason who is better.

>> No.8501146

>>8501123
>believing Trump will change foreign policy

You fucking chumps believe the president is important for anything besides executive orders, and speaking well - oh well.

>> No.8501152

>>8501146
This. We are all pawns controlled by something greater. Memes. The DNA of the soul.

>> No.8501161

>>8501122
>believes in global warming
>not in climate change: a completely natural thing
can't really argue with the vaccine thing though

>> No.8501163

>>8501123
Science-wise no because his foreign policy consists of buddying up with Russia, bombing people he doesn't like, and finally ditching NATO countries who don't pay what they should. This means countries actually have to spend on military, which leaves less for science.

>> No.8501174

>>8501124
>implying morality isn't absolute

seems like we've got a relativist on our hands boys, you know what to do

>> No.8501343
File: 109 KB, 342x421, mfw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8501343

>>8501174
>Ayn Rand

>> No.8501347

>>>>/his/

Please op, don't break rules.

>> No.8501359

>>8501117
Politics=/=science.

>> No.8501363

>>8501124
/thread

>> No.8501425

>>8501117
is that my man alcibiades?

>> No.8501439

>>8501124
>Moral is subjective

You have touched on a question that has gone unanswered for thousands of years. Of course, /sci/ hates philosophy (even though "science" is just applied empiricism), so nobody gives a flying fuck.

>> No.8501497

>>8501439
Science isn't applied empirism. It's a fancy luxury good owned by media companies.