/sci/ - Science & Math

1/0 = 0

>>8476469
fourier series are pretty sick if you ask me

>>8476469
my dick (mathematically formalized by infinitesimals)

>>8476475
then what's 0 * 1?

Money

>>8476469

>>8476469
Computer science

>>8476480
0

That's why its so beautiful.

>>8476475
0*0=1 ?

>>8476582
0*0 = 1/0^0/0

π=3.14159

2 * ф

>>8476475
Am i really that dumb? If you take nothing away from 1 how is it 0

>>8476601
then 0^0 = 1?

[eqn]e \times i \times pi + 1 = 0[/eqn]

c^2 = a^2 + b^2

Elegant, beautiful, everyone and their dog uses it

>>8476469
music.

>>8476748
>he doesn't know what exponents are

>>8476752
that this doesn't generalize to ANY higher exponents

>>8476770
Who are you quoting?

>>8476789
his identiy shouldn't multiply e with i
you're supposed to superscript i and pi for it to be true

I'm not being sarcastic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxuU8jYkA1k

the idea of a numerically perfect symmetrical object is mesmerizing.

also >>8476769

I find it depressingly beautiful that, no matter how much time I put into it, I won't ever be able to gain basic understanding of all math fields that exist.

>>8476811
Just learn category theory. Everything in math is applications of categories in one way or another.

Not pure math, but I think the 3D models of supernovae are an absolutely amazing achievement of computation and mathematics.

>>8476469
Chaos equations, or perhaps Zorn's lemma.
ps. fuck Euler's identity, after a while it starts feeling like a basic answer to questions like this.

>>8477243
it's one of the first mind blowing things you learn about in your freshman year, which is the standard level of education around here, hence it comes up a lot

-1/12

>>8476469
>>8476469
>>8476469
This fractal is madden after three minutes of digital image processing and is one of the most beautiful things able to do with mathematics

>>8477297
1+2+3+...
what was this called again?

>>8476475
1/0 = infinity
1/infinity = 0
do you not know how to take a limit?

>>8477349
Riemann zeta function

>>8476469
1 + 1 = window

gotta think outside the box, math is awesome

>>8477424
Right idea wrong explanation
Not to be bully but if you're a calc 1 or pre calc student, and you post about obscure math trivia it WILL show.

>Take the limit
Either the best counter meme on /sci/ today or actually new.

Finite quantum walks with absorbing boundaries

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-7NAVvBF4DY

>>8476469
.999=1

Anything not equal to zero is not equal to zero.

It's pretty fundamental but that's what makes it grand.

>>8476802
yo wtfff

1 + 2 + 3 +... = -1/12

>>8477515
no hat's 0.001 less than 1

>>8476802
"math"
>>8477579
dont take the bait

>>8476825
>muh math=foundations
>muh categories
you people are the worst

>>8476843
nah senpai that's the scan of the tumor in my testicle the doc took the other day

>>8477488
Hey now, even a calc 1 student should be able to properly represent that argument, they were just lazy/dumb.

Barnett's integrable spaces

>>8476469
1+2+3+4+5... = -1/12

>>8476800
He's joking, you fucking dumbass

Meh, you can only troll idiots with the Riemann zeta function because they know nothing about analytic continuation.

So to be honest

Simply stating

1+2+3+4+....= -1/12 is not correct until you put it into the right context.

>>8478412
>>8477427

I thought it was Ramunajan Summation.
Are they they same thing, or two different methods that yield the same result?