/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8384397
A very accurate representation of paranoïa.

desu I've never seen a toothpaste brand in USA have antibacterial claims

>>8384397
Anyone who takes the le estrogen is female and le testosterone is male meme too seriously is an idiot.

>>8384397
>Someone posted this in a /pol/ thread.
This should already tell you how accurate it is

>>8384397
High amounts of xenoestrogens fucking with your endocrine system is a known fact, so limiting their ingestion is at worst irrelevant and at best a smart and healthy choice.

>>8384421
Hey buddy, everything fucks with your endocrine system. Calling them "xenoestrogens" is the typical diet-slang that advertisers use nowadays to scare idiots into thinking that they know what they're talking about, even though the vast majority of them have never taken a single course in college level biology.

>>8384430
So you're agreeing with me?

>>8384433
He's calling you stupid.

>>8384413
Yea, why do they prescribe those hormones for people trying to be the opposite sex anyways? Why do they even bother testing testosterone in older males or guys with certain dysfunctions?

>>8384446
>Yea, why do they prescribe those hormones for people trying to be the opposite sex anyways?

Are you implying that the amount of """""""xenoestrogens""""""" you're getting from the residual intake of whatever it thinks you get it from, is comparable AT ALL to a concentrated large dosage injection?

I mean, we don't talk like this around here often, but are you fucking retarded?

>>8384397

An anonymous, entirely unsourced, and openly racist and homophobic text document about chemicals in food being bad for your manliness?

Because insults won't change the minds of anyone who would actually believe it, I would just encourage healthy skepticism, if not immediate outright rejection based on my earlier objections.

Dieting advice based on avoiding chemicals is notoriously difficult and most people doing it outside of a medical context have an interest in either selling you something (Chemical free! TM) or are doing it out of a personal fear of the unknown; that chemicals not known are dangerous.

Always ask for scientific sources and look for opinions which carry weight; anyone can say anything and it's your job to filter unsubstantiated garbage.

>>8384456
>openly racist and homophobic text document
Yeah, I couldn't even finish reading it got so bad. I'm literally shaking right now

>>8384397
>avoid beef, chicken, pork, milk, butter, cheese, ice cream, flax, toothpaste, sesame seeds, sunflower seeds, dried fruit, processed meats, most chocolate, most candy, and alcohol

Is this a joke?

>>8384463
Oh fuck off troll, you ain't fooling anyone.

>>8384449
I think I just didn't read my post or you were overcontextualizing it. I was merely responding to

>le estrogen is female and le testosterone is male (is a) meme

>>8384463
wtf i hate science now

>>8384470
You removed the "mass produced" part in that quote.

/sci/ is full of feminized cuck lords.

>triggered /pol/sters being BTFO as expected and infiltrating into /sci/

>still offering zero sources for their claims in the documents
>still offering zero credibility from the author

Pretty much how I thought this thread would go.

>>8384456
>science
>encouraging people to reject something immediately because of 'racism and homophobia'
wew

>>8384496
Still not an argument. Pretty much how I expected /sci/ to handle this.

>>8384501
>>8384485
>>8384463
/pol/ trolls provide some actual damn sources that can be talked about or just leave.

>>8384496
The guy that posted the thread expected you geniuses to refute the image's claims with ease. All we've got so far is "omg are u kidding me?"

>>8384496
tu quoque.

>>8384505
They have been refuted.

Things which are asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

>>8384505
Expecting /sci/ to exhibit any form of masculinity in demonstrative argumentation is like expecting a woman to grow a cock with a T injection.

>>8384511
Except if you guys have knowledge on this stuff you could refute the claims with substantive arguments right?

>>8384515
We have. Numerous posts have provided text-book responses to claims such as these by using deductive reasoning.

If you're asking /sci/ to do more than that when literally zero applied sciences are being used and it's all vague jingoism that's being applied, you're sorely mistaken.

I propose renaming this board /ndt/

>>8384515
The fact that you still expect people to just instantly dismiss any random claim just shows you have very unclear idea about what expertise is.

Anybody can make up a long list of random claims. Assessing them takes a lot longer. And there's no reason to do that job if they are not sourced in the first place.

OP is a fgt who can't handle the fact he's a low-T cuck.

/sci/ couldn't even save OP

many lulz were had

>>8384397
tl;dr

>>8384523
>>8384528
Fine, is the popular concept of xenoestrogens correct in that certain synthetic chemicals e.g. BPA can have negative or unintended consequences when ingested or absorbed by the human body. Will plastic containers containing BPA have any significant or unintended effects on the endocrine system and the body as a whole, particularly in regards to testosterone production? I am neutral in this debate and I'd be interested in answers if you have prior knowledge

>>8384532
eat organic, non-processed foods. avoid plastic containers when eating drinking. avoid known chemicals in products known to reduce T hormones

>>8384523
And yet no one thought to link to any of these? Or even mention this fact before? surely there is an archive or screengrabs that do the job. I mean even shoe0nhead has a literal button she can press that explains the earnings gap between men and women,

I'm actually kind of interested in what is and isn't real. I just avoid heating plastic and styrofoam and try to eat healthy fats. I'm skeptical on a good bit of the post.

>>8384397
>broscience image with no sources or citations

Worthless in every aspect. Only sub-110 IQ brainlets would give this any second thoughts.

>>8384543
>Worthless in every aspect. Only sub-110 IQ brainlets would give this any second thoughts.
Mooom, LOOK I posted it again!!!

>>8384548
Not an argument. Thanks for conceding, brainlet.

>>8384530
>lulz

You need to be at least 18 to post here.

/b/ is for underages, go back to where you came from.

>>8384446
certainly not for the same reasons that they RX women with certain issues estrogen or derivatives there of either.

>>8384397
Just give us a source to work with and we will go through the claims. If there is no source there is no evaluation that can be made that won't be removed cause the source chosen to refute is some "shill for the world government trying to make everyone into girls man" leaving those arguing against the broscience unable to respond because there is no way to evaluate how substantial the claims made in this piece of literature are and how likely they are to be biased.

>>8384397
>farmer's market and local produce shill
Fucking kek

The reason you're scrawny is because your genes are absolute dogshit. Remember this: genes are all that matter. Drinking water out of a mason jar won't change that, genelet.

>>8384552
>expecting someone to counter a non argument with an argument

I remember this guy from that Strangelove movie.

I thought he died.

>>8384557
here work through this
>http://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/effects-of-antenatal-exposure-to-phytoestrogens-on-human-male-reproductive-and-urogenital-development/

After all I'm sure it's going to take an Einstein level intellect to deduce that majority female sex hormones or mimics there of, have a negative effect upon males when present in over abundance. Seems crazy almost how like an over abundance of primarily male sex hormones have generally considered negative effects on females, who would have thought.

>>8384501

The author on scientific issues matters. He, when claiming things, stakes his reputation on his claims being correct or at least having been made the claims that they did in good faith.

Racism and homophobia are effectively the trivial case of acting in bad faith: a person, based solely on the parents they were born to and factors they can't control, the racist or homophobe disparages.

It can and should represent a serious stain on your opinion of an author and the intellectual value of his work, even before specificncriticisms of content.

>>8384566
>antenatal

Do you know what that word means? Just asking.

>>8384563
Pointing out how unsubstantiated claims are worthless and can be tossed aside, unless sources are provided, is a sound argument.

I don't make mistakes, unlike the less fortunate posters here, with mediocre IQs in the 120 range.

>>8384567
literal ad hominem

You can prove someone knows nothing and/or is acting in bad faith if you debunk a few of their arguments...after that it's logical to dismiss them. But unless they're making bad arguments for what you consider to be sexist/racist/homophobic, you're really not addressing the issues.

>>8384583
>literal ad hominem

It's "literally" not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias

>>8384576
>mediocre IQs in the 120 range.
Hey, we gained 10 points.

>>8384535
>Is the popular concept of xenoestrogens correct?
Very probably, but the specific examples given are probably bullshit. Many preservatives, dyes, and additives can have disruptive effects on your body. Most educated people would agree that processed food is usually bad and "organic"(so much as that label means anything) food is usually better. All those chemicals in processed food can have ill effects on the endocrine system, but any food is so chemically complicated that narrowing it down to anything specific is usually meaningless. One day omega-3s are good, but then fish has too much bad fats, then good cholesterol, but then mercury, blah blah blah. Food science isn't advanced enough to be able to tell you which foods affect your systems on a broad level or how, so any claim, especially unsourced broscience claims, about "fuck lavender" "pine soap is good for you" "canola oil is literally the devil" etc etc is 98% certain to be absolute bullshit.
What I'm telling you is, xenoestrogens are probably the least of your worries, and you couldn't avoid them specifically even if you tried.
>Will plastic containers containing BPA have any significant effects on the body?
I'll admit before saying anything that I know little about it. From my personal experience, I can say that although I have seen numerous fearmongering clickbait articles about "hurr durr plastics are evil," I have yet to see any substantive science behind the idea. But again, processed things are often bad for you. I personally doubt BPA has anything to do with anything, but who knows?

tl;dr
If it sounds like a retarded child wrote it, it's probably not true. If it sounds like clickbait, it probably is. Not always; but very probably.

>>8384572
are you seriously trying to imply that these hormones or derivatives are only harmful during the fetal stages?

>>8384585
The dipshit doesn't even specify mean and stdev. He's clearly a moron.

>>8384584
nah, literally is. Can you not argue against the assertions of a person who has a cognitive bias? If someone is making the asinine assertions short of denying reality, can you not just point out a few of their numerous logical or factual flaws and say "I rest my case" if they can't respond?

>>8384593
>>8384585
How's that 122 baby IQ treating you?

You'll never come close to my 146 composite IQ score on the WAIS.

>>8384592
In the amounts currently being specified, yes, or during very very very early child-hood, where you likely won't be subjected to much of it in the first place.

You would need to see consistent, heavy exposure to it on a daily basis for it to effect your bodies endocrine system in a significant way.

>>8384600
If you are on 4chan you can safely remove 50 points.

>>8384600
True. Because I'm way beyond 146 in the upward direction. The fact that you didn't take that into account in your statement proves how far below me you are.

>mfw not even lying
>mfw my IQ is more than five standard deviations above the mean
>mfw I'm just enjoying this small roast for a few minutes

>>8384604
what amounts are being specified as I didn't see that anywhere?

>>8384609
I would've expected a more intelligent response.

>>8384583
Racism and homophobia are bad arguments. If someone endorses flat-earth, they are much less credible than an intelligent person. In a similar way, racism and homophobia have been shown to be intellectually lazy and biased arguments.

Further, this directly corresponds to the author's argument. He says estrogen is bad because it leads to feminine traits, which is inevitably going to lead to bias against anything he sees as feminine, even if its unbiased. He also says he hates niggers because they have a different hormonal system, which, although I am not an expert, sounds like an atrociously bullshit claim.

No shit I'm not gonna trust someone like that. That's not an ad hominem, thats being smart enough to filter out the retards.

>>8384613
You just got your ass handed to you.

Weak post.

>>8384397
150+ iq masterrace reporting in

>>8384612
Since it's all residual, the amounts can't be more than miniscule. We're talking micrograms, if that.

>>8384609
Another 170+ IQ? Awesome. What were your subcategory scores and what test did you take, friend?

>>8384618
>masterrace
I'd just like to say that as a Jewish man of faith that term is horribly offensive. Please refrain from using it in the future, thank you

>>8384616
>you just got your ass handed to you

Different person.

>>8384623
I'm like another Christopher Lagan. I destroyed the WAIS IV.

>>8384625
>Different person.

Does that even matter on an anonymous board? You can't even get on our level.

/sci/ is a low-T, low-IQ cuckboard.

>>8384624
shalom apologies

>>8384631
If this is what it sounds like to have a 170 IQ, then I'm very glad.

>>8384637
Thank you, youre a good go.. I mean guy

>>8384615
I would be inclined to agree with you if everything that was called "racist" and other ists were shown to be false. Yes, things like eugenics and some of the early racialism was bunk, but now if you don't say that everyone is categorically the same, then you're some sort of ist. The issue with the Morton skulls is why I will not immediately dismiss a person just because they're accused of Racism http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html?_r=0 The same with Phillip Rushton.

>>8384587
We waited almost an hour and a half, but finally we got a decent response to OP. Not a straight debunking, but it was definitely more insightful than all the "I can't even" posts. Thanks.

>>8384620
yea and the effects are cumulative. And we don't know what we're talking for dosages because for the longest time governments and science in general found no problems with exposure. It's only now after long time exposure with complete saturation into our lives and bodies that we're starting to see negative developments. It's very similar to the whole BPA thing, countless infants and children received heavy exposure to what was considered safe until it wasn't. And it's still not definitive what the end result of that is going to be as they age.

>>8384628
What'd you get on PSI? Or the others? I'm mostly interested in that PSI.

>>8384640
Poor low-IQ cuck. His low I.Q. causes him to make unintelligent assumptions from a few posts on an anonymous board, as can be expected of those with a low I.Q.

>>8384646
>the effects are cumulative

You don't know how intake works. Effects are cumulative when they are in excess for extended periods of time. Fat doesn't build if your intake is constant but your metabolism is high.

This isn't something like a dam, where the pressure builds over time, we're talking about an organic regulatory system whose job it is to filter and expend daily. This is why testosterone levels vary wildly any given year. Your testosterone levels are subject much more to your activities and genetics than they are to your actual intake, unless you're taking substantive supplements, like with people who want to change their gender.

>>8384647
My PSI score was the highest the psych had seen in over three decades of testing adults. Assuming a minimum of two evaluations per day over the course of 30 years, that gives 30*365*2 = 21900; thus, my score was higher than all 21899 prior evaluations.

Basically, my scores were incalculable.

>>8384648
Francis Crick has an IQ of 115 and he's still smarter than you'll ever be.

>>8384653
(Not him) but is the system entirely effective at processing excesss consumption? Even if 98-99% is dealt with, we could see some greater effects over a long period of time

>>8384655
Heh. Francis Crick is a low-grade hack who made one little insight into reality while under the influence of LSD and the help of his partner.

Try again, cucklord.

>>8384659
>being this mad

Lol, looks like uncontrollable rage is a side effect of being a beef-brain.

>>8384397
> newly appeared in the 21st century
they didn't even get past the first sentence without making a mistake.

>>8384662
Still making unintelligent assumptions.

>Not even mad.

>Enjoying this roast of low-IQ peons on the /sci/ cuckboard.

I hardly ever come to /sci/ because it's full of pretentious wannabes like yourself who always have something to prove and no basis for proving it.

>>8384653
umm yes we know that phytoestrogens build up in the body and that they are endrocrine disrupters. Again you use a logical fallacy to try and make a point but sorry it doesn't work. I should have called you out the first time with equating a small dosage as safe, when you tried saying we're talking micrograms, which by the way doesn't in anyway mean that could be safe or even relatively safe nanograms could be harmful for all we know.

You /sci bros really need to visit /pol and at least learn to not fallacy. We take a lot of shit for being racist nazi's but at least we can argue correctly
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3074428/

>>8384654
Nice meme. Thanks for exposing yourself, brainlet.

My scores were also incredibly high, to the point of being incalculable, and they prompted me to take the Stanford-Binet and a Ravens IQ test. That's why they do with every prodigy, unless, you were lying. In the case that you aren't, I've got a little question that will determine if you're a brain-chad like me. Which test do they prompt you to take, afterwards?

>>8384663
Tweedledum nitpicking is the best that /sci/ can do when posed with a challenge.

Utter failure.

>>8384657
>but is the system entirely effective at processing excesss consumption

Unless you start swallowing ink, or ethanol, then yes. But even then, those are two examples where the body is subjected to extremes.

You'd sooner build tolerance to it rather than it begin to seriously effect you, much like with alcohol, unless you over-load your body with it all at once. If you took all those chemicals you consumed in a week and concentrated it down into a single days worth, then you would see a major reaction.

>>8384643
Wow, I've read the nytimes article! One can only imagine the shitstorm this would cause if released in todays politically correct safe space...

>>8384643
Hey, those were both me. Fun.

I'm not saying that everything that implies a difference between races is false, or that it should be dismissed out of hand. If an intelligent, credible person says "Look, I think people of African descent tend to be less intelligent, based on these studies that show a strong correlation," then I would take that seriously and attack his arguments based on their own merit.

But as a rule, if your argument includes "nigger," "inferior," "monkey," "go back to Africa" etc etc, your beliefs are motivated by racism and not science.

Accusing someone of racism because they disagreed with you, thats intellectually dishonest and likely an ad hominem attack. Accusing someone of racism because they said monkey land belongs to Aryans.... that's probably justified. We've had numerous discussions on /sci/ about whether racism is scientifically justified, many of which I've put in my two cents, and the consensus is that its unscientific.

>>8384671
>>8384667
>>8384659
>>8384654
>>8384648
>>8384631
>>8384616
>>8384609
>>8384600
>>8384593
>>8384576
>>8384548
Why does /pol/ get so triggered to the point that they shift into full shitposting mode, whenever people don't agree with them? What underlying insecurities do they have?

>>8384668
>umm yes we know that phytoestrogens build up in the body and that they are endrocrine disrupters. Again you use a logical fallacy to try and make a point but sorry it doesn't work. I should have called you out the first time with equating a small dosage as safe, when you tried saying we're talking micrograms, which by the way doesn't in anyway mean that could be safe or even relatively safe nanograms could be harmful for all we know.

Quit being a stupid cuck please.

http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00966-2/abstract

>>8384669
They asked me to take the Ravens, CCFIT, and Bonnardel.

But you're wrong. That line of testing doesn't prove anything by comparison. A low IQ like yours making false assumptions is typical, however.

>>8384653
top kek you realize that endocrine disrupters don't get processed out the body like normal hormones do right? It's literally why they pose a problem, if they were simply normal hormones our bodies could easily break them down and deal with them, the problem is they aren't natural chemicals usually found within our bodies yet they mimic the effects of them.

>>8384686
>A low IQ like yours making false assumptions is typical, however

Has much less to do with low IQ and much more to do with narcissism (IE mental illness)

>>8384678
Making generalizations from anonymous posts. How typical of the /sci/ cuckboard. Reality can be difficult to confront, I suppose, when your mind can't make much sense of it but instead have to be guided by the prior thoughts of those before.

>>8384694
You could've said that in a lot less words.

>>8384686
>>8384669
>>8384667
>>8384654
>>8384655
>>8384648
>>8384647
>>8384631
>>8384623
>>8384616
>>8384613
>>8384609
>>8384600
>>8384585
>>8384576
what the literal fuck is this entire exchange

>>8384686
are you retarded? Your proof is based on impacts on bio available testosterone levels in men impacted by soy

>>8384698
Two idiots arguing over IQ.

>>8384694
>does the same thing
Wew

>>8384697
Concision is for who can understand without explicit extrapolation. Basically, I dumbed it down for you.

>>8384698
2 nonmeme retards

>>8384699
>impacted by soy
>which is a huge carrier of phytoestrogens

R E T A R D
E
T
A
R
D

>>8384703
Nope. That wasn't an assumption. That was an observation. A low IQ like yours (typical of /sci/) would be unlikely to discern the difference, however.

>>8384704
>coming from a man who can't smarten up his posts

Golden.

>>8384706
> can only "communicate" in memes
> calls others who use nonmemes retarded
> is likely severely retarded and unoriginal in own communication

>>8384678
Please, just go back to getting cucked. This board is for smart people.

>>8384680
are you retarded? Your proof is that soy has no impact of total bio available testosterone in men.

>>8384714
Dumbing it down is something I've learned to do for the sake of 99.999999% of those I've interacted with. Otherwise, I'd be incomprehensible to people like you. The fact that you don't realize this indicates you've very rarely had an experience with other humans comparable to my own (meaning you're clearly not likely to be within three standard deviations of my cognitive performance).

>>8384709
But irritability is closely linked with mental illness and depression, with Rs ranging from 0.7 to 0.86, both of which are highly prevalent here. Sorry that you fail to see the big picture, roach.

>>8384724
Assuming irritability based on purely verbal content is a sign of animalistic projection. Basically, you're the unintelligent roach here.

>Sugar and caffeine are xenoestrogens
Do you have even a shred single of evidence for this or is this just /pol/ being /pol/ as usual?

>/pol/ gets cucked by /sci/, once again: The Thread

I imagine this is what all those dumb studycucks in my classes felt like when I didn't come to class and didn't study, but I still wound up acing all my exams and getting perfect scores. It must be infuriating.

>>8384729
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=sugar+xenoestrogen
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=caffeine+xenoestrogen

>100 replies
>why.jpeg

have /pol/ users even passed 8th grade science?

>>8384727
It isn't an assumption. It's a clear-cut observation to anyone that studies linguistics, but of course I wouldn't put it past a roach to not understand the many nuances that betray a seemingly "calm mind"

>>8384734
Neither of those links contain any paper that suggests a direct link between sugar, caffeine and xenoestrogens.

Are all /pol/tards naturally morons or do you just become that way from browsing a board with the lowest level of discourse on 4chan?

>>8384731
You actually went to school? What for? There's nothing to learn there except how to obey (false) authority.

>>8384740
Claiming I'm a roach out of hand communicates far more irritation than any of my posts could be miscontrued by a /sci/tard such as yourself as having. It's OK. Slip back into secure anonymity. If this were reality, you'd likely be severely psychologically damaged. Just chant these words: "it's not real". You'll be fine, poor low-IQ /sci/tard. Comfort your unintelligent ego. No one will judge you.

>>8384748
I didn't give you permission to reply to me. Listen, it was entertaining, first. Hell, it was actually funny.

But now I'm getting the feeling that you actually think that you're on my level. From the day I was born, I was destined for success, you little shit. I was brought into this world by a software engineer and and a prominent actuary, both of Norwegian descent. From the moment that the fucking curtains were raised, I was set to dominate the STEM fields. And because I had guardians that actually cared about me, I flourished. Pretty soon, I was placed into a special school of correspondence, specifically I.M Gelfand's school for gifted children in New England. I not only reached my parents' expectations, but I passed them with flying colors. I had raw talent. I was fucking better. I was surrounded by 6th graders, many from Hong Kong, who were smarter than half the posters in this fucking thread. And now, where am I?

In MIT, getting my double BS in Electrical Engineering and Physics, with a Stanford-Binet tested IQ of 147 at age 17.

Get this through your head: you are nothing. I am worth more than your entire goddamn family. I'm smarter than you, better looking than you, taller than you, wealthier than you, and more employable than you. While you type out another post to get cheap laughs, I'll be simultaneously working with the brightest minds in the world and fornicating with my beautiful girlfriend. It gets on my nerves when people pretend to be better than me.

Know your place, you fucking vermin. Never, ever reply to my posts, again.

You idiots are responding in a thread that was started in /pol/. Here it is: >>>/pol/91113226

>>8384751
> Destined to be a low-grade maggot.
Try again, /sci/tard.

>>8384751
Eww. Another pretentious freak on /sci/. Not surprising. What a degenerate board.

>>8384751
>>8384751
>implying a double degree candidate at MIT would have time to waste his life arguing on the internet
either you're failing or lying

>>8384751
>Narcissism combined with an overweening sense of self-importance bordering on psychopathy.

Indeed, I figured as much when you thought a 146 IQ is actually high.

>>8384751
It was a hot summer day and I was in my workout room benching 1200 pounds. My abs were flexing and girls within a 10 mile radius were getting wet. Once I was done with my daily 32 hour workout I called one of the bitches I know, Jessica. She is really damn hot and looks like a supermodel. SO I got into my Lamborghini Gallardo and reved it up to 40,000 RPM (this is an Italian import with special engine system). I got onto the freeway near my house and threw it into 8th gear, I hit about 600 mph and I could hear the sonic boom as I broke the sound barrier. As I was flooring it on the freeway like a badass, Jessica called me and said she wanted me to **** her. So be it.

I came to a full stop from 700 mph in front of her house. These Ferrari?s have top notch brakes, you know. So she gets out of the house and walks up to my Bugatti and starts eyeballing my dick. I could tell she was staring at it because when I looked at her I noticed she was looking at my dick. Booya.

Flash forward 10 minutes later. My 30 inch dick is going inside of her VAGINA, hitting them walls. I?m holding her entire body up with my left pinky as I?m ****ing her and she has 30,000 orgasms. She looks me in the eyes and she says ?harder.? V-TEC just kicked in, yo. I blow my load so hard she falls off my dick. There had to have been about two pints of cum everywhere. People say I cum like a pornstar, I wouldn?t disagree with them.

I throw her a towel so she can clean herself up then I do a triple backflip into my Maserati and drive home

>>8384751
What in the fuck happened to this shitlord? Damn. He got roasted and toasted.

>>8384751
Thanks for the new pasta

>>8384751
>tfw to smart to go to MIT
>tfw to smart to go to college

I didn't give you permission to reply to my emmince. Genuflect before me. I command you to listen. At first my pre-eminence listened and was entertained. Nay, I found it even jocular for someone to think they were superior to me.

However, it becomes apparent that you genuinely believe and think you are, if not my equal, above me. From my very conception, the instance my mother's egg was penetrated by my fathers sperm, I am being destined for supremacy, you squirming maggot. I was brought into this world by a hacker and computing whiz and prominent high-ranking official, both of Scandinavian descent. From the moment I emerged from my mother's beautiful birth canal, I was set to dominate the whole of academia and human endeavors. Regardless of my parentage, I flourished through the awesomeness of my mere existence. Shortly, at the mere age of 2 years after birth (nearly three years since my conception), I was placed in a special board school beyond the likes of most people. I greatly exceeded and surpassed my parents' expectations. I had vibrant intellictual prowess and sheer cognitive fluidity. I was and still am the best of humanity. Not even the sixth graders who surrounded me, many of whom were from Hong Kong, could measure up to half of my intellictual potential.

In the CIA, acquiring special itelligence and military training in Mathematics, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Physics, with a Stanford-Binet tested IQ of 186 at the age of 11.

I advise that you make the attempt to comprehend this with your feeble mass of neurons: you are absolutely nothing to me. At the genetic level, I am beyond your superior. I am beyond your wildest imagining. No human can begin to compare to me. While you attempt to justify your insolent messages with petulent churls, I will be the mind behind all the great happenings on this planet. Know your place, puny human.

Do not expect me to deign to reply to your pathetic posts again.

>>8384751
I didn't give you permission to reply to my emmince. Genuflect before me. I command you to listen. At first my pre-eminence listened and was entertained. Nay, I found it even jocular for someone to think they were superior to me.

However, it becomes apparent that you genuinely believe and think you are, if not my equal, above me. From my very conception, the instance my mother's egg was penetrated by my fathers sperm, I am a being destined for supremacy, you squirming maggot. I was brought into this world by a hacker and computing whiz and a prominent high-ranking official, both of Jewish descent. From the moment I emerged from my mother's beautiful birth canal, I was set to dominate the whole of academia and human endeavor. Regardless of my parentage, I flourished through the awesomeness of my mere existence. Shortly, at the mere age of 2 years after birth (nearly three years since my conception), I was placed in a special board school beyond the likes of most people's imagining. I greatly exceeded and surpassed my parents' expectations. I had vibrant intellictual prowess and sheer cognitive fluidity. I was and still am the best of humanity. Not even the sixth graders who surrounded me, many of whom were from Hong Kong, could measure up to half of my intellictual potential.

In the CIA, acquiring special itelligence and military training in Mathematics, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Physics, with a Stanford-Binet tested IQ of 186 at the age of 11.

I advise that you make the attempt to comprehend this with your feeble mass of neurons: you are absolutely nothing to me. At the genetic level, I am beyond your superior. I am beyond your wildest imagining. No human can begin to compare to me. While you attempt to justify your insolent messages with petulent churls, I will be the mind behind all the great happenings on this planet. Know your place, puny human.

Do not expect me to deign to reply to your pathetic posts again.

------------------------------

Everyone above this line is a brainlet

>>8384790
This one's better >>8384815. Fresh off the press.

>>8384817
Good thing you included yourself, dumbass.

LOL

>>8384819
They're both trying way too hard, the latter moreso.

>>8384822
That's why it's better.

>>8384470

>Is this a joke?
No, it's /pol/

>>8384824
They're shit pastas and whoever wrote them probably thinks they're a comedy genius.

>>8384741
Heh. You expect anyone to believe you looked at all of the articles in those links in four minutes? You're such a moronic sack of shit.

Go eat a bag of dicks.

>>8384830
The first is the low-grade original. The second is the improved version.

It's not about comedy. The second was taking the first and making it more grandiose as an attack upon the first.

Follow the thread, if you can, moron.

>>8384815
A couple typos but fixable. Good job anon.

>>8384832
>implying you or anyone on /pol/ did

>>8384815
>intillectual
Kek

>>8384751
>whom
KEK

>>8384843
>implying anyone on /pol/ did not

>>8384846
>typos a typo
How do you fuck up that bad?

>>8384849
that's impossible given that /pol/tards are just a bunch of NEETs with a cuck fetish

>>8384446

In that regard.

What are the physiological consequences of overflowing your body with hormones except that you might grow depedent on them?

I mean, if you're constantly receiving hormonal sources from somwhere else in huge quantities your body would "think" that you're producing too much hormones and would inhibit those pathways while at the same time making extra receptors to take care of the hormonal excess.

At least, I'm supossing it works like that.

>>8384751
Shit pasta, faggot.

>>8384815
Now this is a high IQ pasta.

>>8384397
>Private profit and social need have radically diverged, with serious adverse impacts
>Marxism is wrong and evil though
>Oh, also Marxism and critical theory are at all similar and can be aligned with one another
God fuck, this gets a D- in accuracy and an F in self-awareness before you even get to its scientific issues

>>8384890
You'll grow boobs and shrink your balls.

>enter thread expecting at least some serious replies
>ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
>I'M NOT GOING TO LISTEN TO SOME RACIST! LOL! I DON'T EVEN HAVE TO REFUTE HIM
>UHHH HE'S *SO* WRONG THAT I DON'T EVEN NEED TO REPLY ;) HAHA LOL
>LMAO HE'S FROM /POL/ THEREFORE IF HE SAID THE SKY IS BLUE IT'D TURN BLACK XDD

Why is anti-/pol/ always more retarded and childlike than /pol/?

>>8384912
The burden of proof is on the claimant.
The OP had no evidence or sources
You can never prove a negative
This is skepticism 101

If you shit on the board, flip it and do a victory dance before your opponent's sat down, his subsequent decision not to play against you is not because he's afraid of losing to a superior opponent.

>>8384912
You are one asshurt little mong.

You were already BTFO on several occasions in this thread, but I guess your selective memory took care of that.

And besides, even though its been repeated tons of times:

>>8384918

>plastic and da joooos is the reason white men are unhealthy, autistic and effeminate not the fact white couples don't children until their late 30s

All these /sci/ faggots, that probably can't even dl 50lbs, get so butthurt for no apparent reason

It is proven that exogenous endocrine disruptors are actually a big deal and WILL fuck with your hormones.

But whatever.

Funniest part is that every one of you faggots negatively answereing this post is probably either a wizard or a wizard in training and will never know the touch of a woman.

It would be sad if your replies didn't show it's only due to your genetic UNfitness, but also due to your mindset.

Seriously, flush yourselves nerds

>>8384934
Unironically, it is true, faggot.

>>8385006
I should have known it was /fit/cucks propagating this bullshit.

Talk to me when you're a grad student, or higher.

>>8385074
Never been on /fit/

But you're not denying being a genetically unfit male, so there's that at least.

Enjoy your permanent virginity

>>8385101
so are we effeminate because of xenoestrogens or because of genetics? pick one shit for brains.

>>8385115
Both

you're shit tier genes and the consequent bottom feeder life they have destined you to, have led you to give up on the rest

faggot

>>8385074
>>8385115
>Talk to me when you're a grad student, or higher.
>pick one shit for brains.

No wonder you guys are the worst social retards and rejects on this board lmaooooo

I just fact checked this image and it appears to be solid minus a few bumps in certain assertions but I'd say there's no harm in following this advice. Just don't do anything a scientist would do like rub ammonium salt on your skin.

>>8385101
>>8385125
I come back half an hour later to check if there's any actual discussion, and you guys are still responding.

Wew. Really struck a nerve, there, I see

>>8384503
"Did you know that it's good to eat your own shit and the world is run by Jews puppeteering all major geopolitical events???"
>you're retarded
WOW HAHA LOOKS LIKE I WIN THAT ARGUMENT AGAIN!

>>8385132
can I see every piece of scientific literature you "fact checked" this with

>>8385138
I used the image as it's own source by the subjective principle.

>>8385134
Only spent half hour jerking off to your weaboo shit?

You're clearly low t. I know there's no need to say this because chances are infinitely low, but please never reproduce.

>>8384832
>>8384832
I'm actually stunned how stupid you are. I seriously hope for your sake you are actually just here to stir up shit for a laugh.

Regardless, none of those papers imply A link between xenoestrogens and sugars/caffeine like the other guy said. It's like you just typed in "xenoestrogen sugar" into the search bar of scholar and somehow thought that proves your claim. absolutely 0 of the papers there suggest a link between the either of the two searches you did. You don't need to read all of the papers to know that.

all this insecurity and concern about low testosterone and feminine males leads me to conclude that /pol/ is populated exclusively by those types.

similar to how forums about height are populated exclusively by turbo manlets

who woulda thunk it

>>8385168
Then by your own logic /sci/ is populated by absolute retards and brainlets

Gotcha

>>8385171
/thread

>>8385162
/thread

>>8385171
>>8385171
>>8385171
/sci/ BTFO hahahahahhahhahah

>a new species of white males
>21st century

Look at this fucking uneducated pleb who doesn't know shit about 17th century gender bent roles (boys/young men playing women) in European plays and 18th century castratos (castrated boys to sound like girls) for European operas that appeared before Feminism and mass chemical substance influence were widespread.

Getting back to the point at hand, the writer is right that a lot of our modern consumables have chemicals that can influence our body's hormone development. But like everything else in life just use said consumables in moderation, don't be over by excessive about.

There's no point in trying to get into the details about it because unless you plan on becoming some fucking nomad in the wilderness, you're not going to be able to avoid this entirely.