/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8308752
>look mom, I posted it again!

I see that the colors are different but what do they mean?

>>8308770
It means that your average white person is a full standard deviation ahead of black people

>>8308773

any validity to it?

This graph really... Makes me.... Think.....

>>8308775

What do you specifically mean by validity?

>>8308775
yes

>>8308775
It's on a graph someone drew, so it must be true. I also have a graph someone drew which must be true.

>>8308794
>/pol/ at the lower end up the spectrum

Wtf!

>>8308799
This is the /lit/ version. I've seen like 10 of these where /b/ was at the top half in some of them.

>>8308794
lol, I dont think youre going to be able to find a source that shows differently. Blacks are consistently a SD below whites, jews are consistently a SD above whites. I'm not /pol/, iq might be a flawed way of measuring intelligence, but that disparity is present in multiple studies and the gap seems to persist even when people of similar family incomes are tested. What white supremacists dont realize is that by spamming iq theyre actually showings that they are just as inferior to jews as blacks are to them. But jews are parasites or something so whites are still the best :^)

>>8308794
top tier bait for any board

>>8308857
The difference being when you point out the discrepancy in income between whites and blacks, lolberals whinge and moan about income inequality and institutional racism, but when you point out the prevalence of jews at the top of nearly every industry then it is due to hard work. Strange eh?

>>8308871
it needs to be subtle

>>8308794
>/sci/
>not a brainlet nest
>have more average IQ than 110
>/lit/ not on par with /x/

Whoever did this was clearly trying to compensate for something lol.

>>8308880
i know right? If /sci/'s average iq is 141 we must have some people with like 400 iq bringing it up that high.

>>8308752
Its an objectively measured fact. As scientifically minded people, we cannot let our political affiliations get in the way of objectivity. Who cares if its racist to say black people have a lower iq average than white people, it was measured objectively, so it must be true, unless there are measurement factors that are biased. If we are too afraid to challenge societal notions like "all people are just as smart, no matter their upbringing" or "fat people are as healthy as skinny people" or other contrived shit, then we are sacrificing the objectivity that makes science such a mighty force in reason.

We can all take a lesson from this: Objectivity outweigh political correctness, to choose political correctness over objectivity simply diminished the rationality of science.

>>8308895
There's a lot of trolls here pretending to be stupid

>>8308918
I agree with everything you say, but unfortunately the truth is that objectivity doesn't outweigh political correctness, even on a place like /sci/ which is supposedly open minded and shrouded in anonymity. The liberal egalitarian brigade here are so desperate to deny reality that they routinely bury their heads in the sand. It's not easy to admit the ideology you've given your life to is wrong, it's why they have such a hard time accepting human biodiversity imo

>>8308925
That is no truth. just because others will hide from objectivity does not mean it is not superior to political correctness. liberal egalitarians can believe what they want, I will believe something only if it is rooted in objectivity.

>>8308857
Liberals are consistently above conservatives too, but all the /pol/ in here seems to be disagreeing with science :^)

>>8308919
this desu

just because there's a lot of memeposting on /sci/ doesn't mean they are dumb, they just want to have fun with like-minded people

not everyone wants to be le super mature tryhard scientist

>>8308946
true

>>8308925
And unfortunately the validity of the "results" OP posted are laughable

>>8308945
Don't most of those states at the bottom have sizeable black populations?

>>8308880
wow, this bait graph even works on boards that it compliments

I commend the creator

>>8308954
And those states have terrible schools. Regardless of race.

>>8308954
So you're saying that conservatives, the people who are practically white supremacists, are actually black? Seriously forces one to ponder...

>>8308959
so hen there is the reason for the low iq average for black americans. Poor education, not race.

Now can we all agree that because something seems racist at first, that it might just seem that way because we are not considering possible factors for why that is?

The graph is objective, we just did not know why until now.

>>8308971
Huh I wonder what the sample size is..

Making me think

>>8308966
I will have no politics in my science board. Either get objective or get out.

>>8308971
hmm really makes you think

>>8308973
sample size might be sqewed...

>>8308983
Wtf?

>>8308975
This whole thread is off topic /pol/shit, why are you targeting the one that you disagree with as being off topic?

>>8308986
Because anyone who disagrees with him causes him to be triggered

>>8308986
should i have targeted everyone instead?

>>8308975
objectively, black people have the lowest IQ compared to any other race.

>>8308986
Facts are offensive and they will stay in this board. SJW tier shitposting won't change anything. Black people have low IQs, they commit more crimes, they rape, steal, murder more than any other race.

>>8308993
this whole post is political bias.

>>8309002
>facts
>>>/x/

>>8309002
Thank you

>>8308971

No. Fuck off. Education does not increase IQ.

Actually do some reading on the subject before you go off spouting shit.

>>8309005
>statistics are politics
spotting retards 101

>>8309011
very well, i will.

>>8309011
Tripfag you do know you can study for IQ tests don't you?

>>8309002
>objectively, black people have the lowest IQ compared to any other race.
I feel like this result is skewed because IQ tests do not comprise of DNA testing so there is no way to determine the race of the person without asking them. And there have been cases where white people lie and pretend to be black (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Dolezal).).
It would explain the skew because the type of people willing to lie about being black are the ones with the low IQs.

>>8308986
>This whole thread is off topic /pol/shit

Tell me how race and intelligence is off topic on a science board lmao. You're just a butthurt little faggot who doesn't want their feelings hurt

>>8309019
White people don't magically turn black when they say it out loud...

>>8309019
you should make that a movie

>>8309019

>>8309017

That does not prove shit. Take 2 people, a smart guy and a dumb guy, given the same amount of prep, the smart guy will score higher and improve faster with practice. Both will eventually stop getting better, but the smart guy's final IQ score will still be higher than the dumb guy's final score.

>>8309019
wow, i must be black then since im white and have a low iq.
Think about what you just said, faggot.

>>8309022
Don't reply to SJWtards who try to police boards and people. They've yet to accept facts first to be allowed into science boards.

>>8309029
you are not automatically smart though, you need to LEARN to become smart, thus schools

>>8309038

False. General intelligence is unaffected by education. Go read a fucking book.

>>8309041
why would i need to read a "fucking book" if i have the "eneral intelligence" to know that already?

>>8309032
That.
>aknowledge all the facts
>adapt the facts to some political agenda
Choose one

>>8309049
i choose the former.

>>8309049
>blacks have low IQ and do more crimes because anons political agenda
Are you even trying ? Or are you living in another dimension where black people don't cause more crimes than any other race ?

>>8309047
>conflating intelligence with knowledge

You're a fucking moron.

Also, since you're too fucking dense to Google:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445388/

Relevant sentence since you apparently have zero reading comprehension:

>The findings indicate that education’s ability to raise intelligence test scores (as shown by, e.g., Brinch & Galloway, 2012) is driven by domain-specific effects that do not show “far transfer” to general cognitive ability.

>>8309025
Did you even look at the wikipedia link? My whole point is that you can't determine race unless you take a physical test for it or just take their word.
>>8309030
Let's think about what I said together.

>Some white people lie and say they are black.
>These white people are retarded because giving false information to a scientific study is slow progress of understanding and knowledge.
>Therefore some retarded white people will be categorized as black people.
>This will skew the white IQ up while simultaneously skewing the black IQ down.
Make sense?

Social science is not science. There is no objective measurement of IQ so get off this board with your pseudoscience.

>>8309064
These butthurt brainlets make it so obvious these days lol.

>>8309056
key word is "general cognitive ablility", which is NOT the same as "intelligence". Intelligence is a knowledge and understanding of things, whereas general cognitive ability is whether the brain is functioning right or not.

Ya dun fucked up anon. You confused intelligence with cognition.

>>8309057
>>8309072
>>8309064

dull samefag