/sci/ - Science & Math

Take your pedophile cartoons back to >>>/a/.

>>8257074

>>8257196
Take your pedophile cartoons back to >>>/a/

>>8257012
>Elementary particles are pointlike but have mass

Take your Pre /1803/ shit back to /r/18thcentury

>>8257074
>>8257197
This guy literally has no life. Seriously get a load of his pathetic spamming

>>/sci/?task=search&ghost=yes&search_text=Take+your+pedophile+cartoons+back+to

meme forcing is cancer
>>>/trash/
>>>/b/

>>8257012
>Elementary particles are pointlike but have mass →→ infinite density →→ they're black holes

FAIL
delete this thread and save yourself the emberassment

>>8257200
/a/nimemes belong to >>>/a/

>>8257203
Thats not right, newfriend. You can post any SFW picture here, too. Reactionshit doesnt need to be on topic. Not a hard concept

>>8257200
kek
If you have the energy to complain about that,
you have no life either.
That search was the most autistic thing I've seen for quite a while.

>>8257200
Holy fucking shit. LMAO! What a sad cunt. I wish we had Mods that would actually do something against off-topic cunts, spammers and bots. Until then, this is pretty much just /b/Lite

>>8257209
u r sick in the head :O

>>8257212
I am sorry your newfaggotry got exposed. If you keep spamming the same shit over and over, maybe it will become a meme, my autistic friend :^)

>>8257216
DESU

Lord Kelvin, get >>>/out/

>>8257212
>typing 6 words into a search bar is autistic

>>8257012
>>8257012
>Elementary particles are pointlike but have mass →→ infinite density

We model them as points when needed but they do have a finite radius. Also, energy density is a thing, not just volume density.

>two electrons close enough together to be within each other's event horizon

Their Schwarzchild radii are much smaller than their actual radii so the probability of this even occurring is negligible.

> It would again be a pointlike elementary particle because you can't tear apart or break up a black hole and look inside it.

Again, not pointlike. And black holes can't be torn apart or broken up because the potential well is massive, not because they themselves are pointlike.

>Naturally, it would also be stable.
[citation needed]

>>8257259
>but they do have a finite radius
Indeed, [citation needed].

>>8257578
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_particle

>>8257578
seriously faggot?

>>8257578
>>8257584
fug forgot to paste the abstract
>In quantum mechanics, the concept of a point particle is complicated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, because even an elementary particle, with no internal structure, occupies a nonzero volume.