/sci/ - Science & Math

>>>/r9k/

>>7939092
>tfw her math videos are better than her porn videos
Her face and her attitude are okay but her body is actually shit tier.

>>7939092
how does she know how to write backwards

i know its not easy and id make so many mistakes yet she does it so flawlessly

>>7939098
>write normally on a pane of plexiglass
>reverse the video after shooting it
>???
>PROFIT

>>7939098
mirror the video

>>>/b/

>>7939097
you're lying

>>7939097
how do you know her body is shit tier?

>>7939109
Why would I be lying about my taste in porn?

>>7939110
Because I've seen her porn videos. Naked she doesn't look good.

>>7939097
Hello good sir,

Could you please provide a source for her pornographic videos? Please?

Thank you in advance.

>>7939129
google.com

>>7939121
She has a porn?

>>7939131
Ah, found it!

Thanks so much!!!

>>7939131
holy shit man , i'd fap but i just finished fapping before finding this

>>7939135
>>7939131
>>7939129
>>7939121

>>7939097
She does kinda look like Anissa Kate

>>7939165
no she doesnt

>>7939092

>>7939092
To be honest, I probably couldn't stand dating a smart girl. I feel there would be continual conflict because a girl like that would object to my taking control of the relationship. No, I would be happy with an elementary science teacher or county government worker type. Not a genius, but not a pile of bricks either. Unless someone knows where I can find a top tier grad girl who is hot and has no problem with a man taking control.
>in b4 "relationships should be 50/50" faggotry.

>>7939411
Your toxic masculinity is showing

>>7939411
>marrying anyone less than genius

why even bother with a chance of moderate children

>>7939428
>implying intelligence is linked to specific genes
>implying two geniuses are not likely to produce a complete idiot

>>7939434
>Implying a gene specific is required for something to be genetic
Have you passed 8th grade?

>>7939418
Your pathetic Beta complex is on full display.

>>7939438
By your reasoning, since a specific gene is NOT required, then why bother to marry a person with a specific trait? You've just proved my argument.

>>7939451
>then why bother to marry a person with a specific trait
Dear lord you are retarded >>>/b/

>>7939451
Here's my old 9th grade bio textbook, I'll send it to you if you'd like

>>7939465
Were you teething when you took that course?

>>7939468
ya

>>7939439
Do you want to take this outside you pompous little faggot? Talk shit get hit, bitch

>>7939434
>implying everything is directly correlated with a gene
There is no height gene yet height is genetic

>>7939461
Alright m8 time for science to decide. Since an experiment would be too difficult, we will use existing examples. We will focus on "intelligence". We shall research the great scientific minds of our time that married and had children. We will also examine the scientist's birth, determining whether they were offspring to "genius" parents or otherwise simple ones. We will then analyze the data to answer the following questions:
1. Were most "great" scientists born to intelligent or normie parents? (Or mixed?)
2. Were scientists who married someone of intelligence more likely to have intelligent or normie children?
3. Were scientists who married someone of average to low intelligence more likely to have intelligent or normie children?
My original argument was that intelligence did not follow a similar genetic pattern as opposed to height. Yours argues that we will find a predicable genetic outcome in our little experiment. Do you still feel lucky, Mr. Eugenics man?

>>7939528
GET THE FUCK OFF THIS BOARD

>>7939465

i just nostalgiad... nice

>>7939092
Does anyone actually think that she's good looking?
[spoiler] she's not [\spoiler]

>>7939553
>would not bang

>>7939571
Would actually not. Got a real qt 3.14 at home already.

>>7939536
>mad baby cries and tells people to leave

>>7939098

What's her name?

I'd take any human that's biologically female at this point senpai

women are on earth to be provided for, not to work much, not to seek merit from high risk performance [they seek pleasures with the maximum of security].
Why ? because seeking merit, relevance is precisely for those who fail to be provided for, in providing for somebody else.

Women will do the minimum of work for a maximum of reward. This is why they are okay with playing what they are : pure hedonistic yield, aka eye candy. When you are a woman, you just need to exist in order to avoid having a shitty life.

how to have pleasures, benefit, profit while decreasing the risk of failure, of discomfort, of pain ?
You deport the risk of unhappiness on the men, while extracting as much pleasure as you can from men. You let men bear all the hardship.

>Women are the eternal capitalists.

men<<<<<<<<<, women

>>7939989

>>7940001
I like this picture, what does that make me?

The heart squared at the beginning of her video titles is extremely annoying and I can't watch her videos because of it. In fact, I have gone through the liberty of disliking everyone of her videos without watching them just because of how fucking stupid it is to have that fucking heart symbol in the title of the video. Fuck this bitch.

>>7940022
wow

at a base level women fear for their lives because men are stronger physically. Work smarter not harder ;)

>>7940048
>Work smarter not harder ;)

Kids, for the love of sanity do not ever take this advice seriously. No matter who gives it to you.

Work HARD and work SMART, when you do this you will have any "smart worker" beat.

>>7940053
Why is the world such a competition for women?

>>7939092
Only virgin neckbeards would think that this woman is attractive at all.