[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 363 KB, 1920x1080, HTyEl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7929023 No.7929023 [Reply] [Original]

>Scientific consensus on Neanderthals c.1900: "Man these subhumans were big dumb brutes that couldn't stand up to our cunning and might plus they look like Africans what a bunch of extinct rubes"
>Scientific consensus on Neanderthals c.2016: "WOAH MAN THINK HOW SMART THEY MUST HAVE BEEN WITH THEIR BIGGER BRAINS HAHAH WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY WERE EVOLUTIONARILY UNFIT WE GOT 4% OF OUR DNA FROM THEM, TOO BAD FOR THOSE AFRICANS WHO DON'T HABE ANY"

Anthropology: definitely objective.

>> No.7929047

People will always have a bias for whatever makes themselves seem superior, but at least we have more information available than ever before and ways to share/criticize it. We can always discard the clearly biased results, something nobody did ~1900.

>> No.7930306

[math]2^3[/math]

>> No.7930309

[math]2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2[/math]