/sci/ - Science & Math

a=a

P=NP

P=NP

1 + 2 + 3 = -1/12

>>7897961
>>7897963
N = 1

>>7897961
>>7897963
P=0 or N=1

>>7897950
This thread=shit

>>7897990
>a positive integer added to other positive integers equals a negative integer.
Good job humanity.

a+b = ab

π = 3

barnett's identity

I'm a big fan of the Maxwell equations personally...

>>7898084
This is why, as a math major, I cannot even begin to comprehend how most of my peers are christians.

Does cognitive dissonance feel good? Is there any explanation for this shit?

>>7898106
>whats is rounding.

>>7898106
the measurement was from interior rim to interior rim, so the thickness of the bowl makes up the difference in diameter to make pi = 3.14...

:^)

>>7898059
Well, you can actually arrive at that conclusion analytically.

Its been hundreds of years but why don't go deep into infinite sums and find out what mathematician was the one who made the wrong logical leap that made us later be able to derive clear bullshit like that.

>>7898109
I know about rounding numbers. The representation of pi is clearly an expression, not a number.

>inb4 they rounded the expression xD GOD IS AN AWESOME GOD

>>7898059
>a positive integer added to other positive integers (ramanujan) equals a negative integer.
FTFY

>>7898075
Well that's not right

>>7897997
0=10?

Math is really, really gay.

>>7898114
Pi=Tau/2, praise jesus.

>>7898125
what if both a and b are zero?

>>7898128
Only if mathematicians are the ones doing it.
But if anyone else uses it it's great.

I hate time
I hate space
I hate math

>>7898129
thank you jesus

>>7898131
or 2

measures the whole universe

>>7898131
>>7898197
There are an infinite number of solutions jesus fucking christ

>>7898059
>negative integer
Good to know 1/12 is an INTEGER

9 + 3 = 12

I shiver a little every time I see it

>>7898730
kek

[math]i \hbar \gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi - mc \psi = 0[/math]

>>7898223
does it no just calculate the curvature of spacetime around an object with gravity

>>7898142
then why are you in /sci/

>>7897950
>not [math] e^{i\tau} = 1 [/math]

>>7899066
but it fucking doesnt though, that equals negative one

>>7899078
it's [math] \tau [/math] not [math] \pi [/math], senpai.

>>7898084
Lol pi was already invented by poo in loos in 500BCE

>>7898106
>cognitive dissonance

top kek

>>7899066
>Giving a fucking shit what multiple of pi we use

>>7898114
There's so many stupid underage cringeworthy bait things in this one post.
It's easier to just assume you're not dumb and that you are in fact a troll.

8/10, got me to respond. Will get others before this thread dies.

F = ma

>>7897950
1/0 = infinite

that's the result on most calculators.

0.9999... + 0.000...1 = 1

>>7899129
MINDBLOWING

>>7899129

>>7897950
How is this god tier? That exp(i*x) maps onto the unit circle in C is essentially immediate from its definition.
Literally only mystifying if you don't define exponentiation and just pull that "times itself this many times" bullshit, in which case of fucking course "e^(iπ) makes no sense

>>7897990
Dumbass you forgot the ellipse.

>>7898059
>1/12
>integer
pick one

>>7897950

This is already the top tier equation. All the core numbers are here.

>>7899066
Dumb fucking weeaboo

>>7897950
That equation is shit

It just illustrates the value of cosine and sine on the unit circle at arg(z) = π

>>7899120
You have a really stupid calculator operator.

>>7898084
>what is approximation
I'm an atheist but shitposting like this is disgusting

>>7898142
Well, this board is literally
>time travel
>space travel
>math... Not travel because nothing new is happening in maths

>>7898730
>>7899330
>Positive integers added to other positive integers equals a negative irrational fraction.

>>7898828
probably a biofag

>>7899423
I know, if it weren't I wouldn't have posted it you faggot

>>7898075
>a+b = ab
>>7898125
>>7898131
>>7898197
>>7898225
Unless I botched the math, it's true for

[math]a = \frac{b}{b-1}[/math]

as long as neither a nor b is 1.

>>7900021
>>7899423
>>7897950
Nah, the best constant is phi. OP's equation boils down to circles, which aren't as interesting as phi.

>>7900046
[math]\phi[/math] is used in very few branches of mathematics, unlike complex numbers.

>>7900046
phi is a fine number, fairly uninteresting doe

>>7899129
die

>>7899856
> irrational
> fraction

>>7900505
[math]\frac{\pi}{2}[/math]

= 1
Basically, in binary:
0.1111111.... = 1
Quite similar to the
0.9999999... = 1 in base 10.
Also computers, or slicing a pie in half, then a quarter, then an eighth, etc until you have the whole pie.

4/3*pi*r^3

its a great exercise in triple integrals

>>7898084
I don't understand why people wanna nitpick like this. You have strong points on your side, the strongest being no one can prove god exists, why do you resort to stuff like this? This is not significant at all.

>>7899099
>atheism
>religion

>>7900595
>2016
>not worshipping at the church of our lady Dawkins

Its like you want to get left behind when the next evolution happens

>>7900595
>>7900606
>>7899796
>/sci/
>religion

pick one

>>7900772
Well said fine sir *tips*

Nuclear Engineering fag here, have muh neutron transport equation:

What are the odds the code for this website exist as an uninterrupted string within the binary expression of Graham's number?

>>7897950
[math]y=x[/math]

>>7900859
Googleplex is larger than Graham's Number right?

>>7897990
>a sum of positive integers is not only a negative number, but also a fucking fraction

mathfags will still defend their mental illness.

>>7899129
??

>>7899129
I agree with this assessment.
[math]\sum^{\infty}_{k=1}\frac{9}{10^k}+\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{10^n}= 1[/math]

>>7899129
I agree with this assessment.

[eqn]\sum^{\infty}_{k=1}\frac{9}{10^k}+\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{10^n}= 1[/eqn]

>>7900892
Not sure if bait but if you can somehow write it out, it's going to be much much smaller than Graham's number. Googolplex is just [math]10^{10^100}[/math].

>>7899066
>not [math]e^{i\tau} = e^0[/math]
Step it up.

>>7898109
>>7899796
If it was rounding it'd have been 31 cubits, not 30.

>>7900033
>as long as neither a nor b is 1
This statement is kind of redundant you know. If either was 1 we'd get a = a + 1 or b = b + 1.

>>7901285
Or 9.55 cubits in diameter
Or they sucked at making 15ft giant tubs back then and it was an ellipse measuring ~10 x 9.1

>>7897950
Die, [eqn] cis(\theta) [/eqn]
scum.

>>7898002
correct answer

>>7897950
cospi + isinpi +1 =exp^i^pi
-1 + i*0 +1 = expi^pi

I do not understand why this is supposed to be special. Explain.

[eqn]\Gamma(t)=\int_0^{\infty} x^{t-1}e^{-x}dx[/eqn]

>>7897963
>>7897990
ITT: Noble price material

>>7901558
I still don't understand why don't we use gamma(x+1) which passes through all n! points

>>7900021
>you faggot

I do quite enjoy your lips around my manhood.

>>7900859
1.0

>>7898223
>crashes clover
Wow...

>>7900529
You have to write pi as a fraction

Otherwise sqrt(2)/7 is rational

>>7899107
>not dp/dt

>>7899129
Only because 0.000....1 is 0

You might as well not write it

>>7897950
Is this equation actaully sognificant if is it just a convoluted form of writing something like ((1+e)^0)-1 = 0

>>7902164
>((1+e)^0)-1 = 0
You must be a really stupid fuck to get that out of it
>Anime shit
Yeah thought so

It's just a special case of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_formula

Only relevant ones.
[eqn]\vec{\nabla} \,\cdot\, \vec{E} \,=\, \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}[/eqn]
[eqn]\vec{\nabla} \,\cdot\, \vec{B} \,=\, 0[/eqn]
[eqn]\vec{\nabla} \,\times\, \vec{E} \,=\, -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}[/eqn]
[eqn]\vec{\nabla} \,\times\, \vec{B} \,=\, \mu_0 \,\vec{\jmath} \,+\, \mu_0 \,\varepsilon_0 \,\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}[/eqn]

>>7902301

this pleases me

>>7901867
Because that's Π(x)

>>7902301
>posting the incomplete equations

There are so many nice equations. But I particularly like this one:
[math] S=k_{\text B}\ln W[/math]

>>7902301
>>7902550

>Not writing the superior form

[math] dF = 0 [/math]
[math] d \star F = \star J[/math]

>>7902664
how is this notation superior? you can't get any understanding from that.
also:
[math]\delta\int\limits_{t_0}^{t_1}L\mathrm dt =0

>>7902713
syntax error.
[math]\delta\int\limits_{t_0}^{t_1}L\mathrm dt =0[/math]

>>7902717
Good job there anon

>>7902717
>[math] \delta \int \limits _ { t_0 } ^ { t_1 } L \mathrm dt = 0 [/math]

>>7902713
>you can't get any understanding from that

Only if you don't understand exterior calculus.

If you do understand this type of math, then you can the same understanding as the vector calc equations + generalized geometric understanding.

anyone else have any sci tattoos?

>>7902902
>PLEASE LET THIS BE FAKE

>>7902792
thanks. what did I do wrong? I'm not a regular around here
>>7902865
I wouldn't say I have a deeper understanding of differential forms although I had to deal with this kind of maths a couple of times.
But I never found these maths to be necessary for my needs. It just always felt like it only involved some overcomplicated notations of stuff that could be written down more intuitively with the maths I already knew.

>>7902902
what the fuck dude
did your chest get burnt by some hot casted metal or

>>7898110
>"from rim to rim"
>not "from interior rim to interior rim"
Did god fucking stutter or something?

>>7902908
>>7903049
It's real. Got it during my math undergrad. I was retaking elementary trig at uni (took up to complex anal at CC just retook everything at Uni). The unit circle and things related to it are important. Took my shirt off for a few professors to show them.

No regrets. My only tattoo and it's always covered. Some faggot that I think used to make meth has a softball sized four leaf clover (bright green) between his elbow and wrist.

>>7898084
>not using tau

>>7898084

Ahhh... no. You need to understand measurement to writers of the bible. There are no fractions, everything is in whole numbers.

>>7903701
>took all the classes again at uni
I know you're trolling, but this triggers me. No educated person would ever do this

>>7904318
>uni would only let me transfer a certain number of hours. And without GPA credit if I did. I used it for my core classes and just retool maths.

>>7897990
1+2+3=6