[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 13 KB, 385x307, typical.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7676996 No.7676996[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>I dont believe in God because he isnt scientific
>proceeds to make an analogy to some folklore creature to an omnificent entity such as god

>>>>>he actually thinks the man in the sky idea of god is what most people believe>>>>

such intellectuals at /sci/ are probably all fedora grooming atheist i suppose?

inb4
>God cant exist because we cant study him
>God cant exist because of some conflicitng documents some sand people wrote 1000s of years ago
>God cant exist because science tells me so

all subjective arguments
>

>> No.7677006
File: 54 KB, 500x329, shtpost.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7677006

>>7676996

Nice pile of strawmen you've got there.

>> No.7677008

God is irrelevant.

>> No.7677012

>>7677008
yeah, exactly
how does it matter whether does god exist or not

>> No.7677019

>>7676996
There is no reason to believe in a god.

>> No.7677023

>>7676996
I remember watching a video where richard dawkins was discussin about religion with some muslims. There seems to be a story in the muslim bible whith a flying horse. He explained to them that their religion can't be right because flying horses have never been existed (I forgot how he proved this but I assume he has good sources). So if not even flying horses could exist, how could god?

>> No.7677027
File: 66 KB, 502x377, 1444853849530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7677027

>>7676996

>God cant exist because we cant study him

Well we could do experiments. Like getting 1,000,000 believers of the same faith to pray every night for the same cause, to heal someone from cancer or whatever. Ofc they`d never do that since all religion is bullshit and skydaddy doesn`t exist.

>> No.7677051

>>7677023
flying horses = all mighty entity

>> No.7677054

Not related to science or mathematics. Try >>>/lit/ or >>>/his/ or >>>/hm/

>> No.7677056

>>7677027
im arguing from a deistic-ism standpoint. lets say we know nothing about god and all religion is just folklore on paper.

then how could we study God?

>> No.7677064

>>7677006
well pretty much every time i ask this atheist jump to the biblical fallacies first. Im not taking about Jesus im talking about god as a real supernatural entity, no stories, no claims, jus some kind of programmer of our universe or something.

>> No.7677080

>>7677019

This basically, it adds nothing

>> No.7677091

>>7677056
Since there's nothing physical about god, you would need to study him in terms of how people perceive him. To study god is equivocal to studying a certain idea that is shared among people, like the value of currency.

>> No.7677126

>>7677027
Did you even read the OP you faggot?

>>7677054
>origin of the universe isn't science or mathematics

>> No.7677157

>>7677064

what kind of argument do you expect to hear when you're discussing something that can't be proven or disproven.

It's a waste of time

>> No.7677170
File: 126 KB, 500x320, 7ba.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7677170

>>7676996
I knew a physics student. He wanted to build atomic bombs.

I asked why. He said the pay was great, and if his work was ever tested, he never had to worry about whether or not it worked.

This is why I never argue ethics or God with a board made up of physicists.

>> No.7677186

>>7677170

did you tell him he should probably switch to nuclear engineering?

>> No.7677203

>>7677170
But building atomic bombs is moral

>> No.7677206

>>7677126
You're not interested in studying the "origin of the universe", stop pretending you are. You're interested in unfalsifiable, infantile discussion of cultural traits.

Religion threads aren't allowed in /sci/ for a reason. Promptly kill yourself.

>> No.7677218

>believes God isn't real
>believes in aliens
lol