/sci/ - Science & Math

You have to be 18+ to be on 4chan

Are we talking group theory here?

Thats how I understood multiplication when I was 7

>>7530549
What is 2.3 * 1.4 supposed to mean?

>>7531986
you can take it as real fractions and then see both parts as row of additions

>>7531986
convert to fractions

>>7532007
What about e*pi?

>>7532018

>>7532018
use infinite sums

Multiplication is inherent to humans, addition is not.

>>7532020
>saving a thumbnail of my meme
Here, retard.

>Division isn't repeated subtraction
This is more common to hear, tbh

>>7532046
Multiplication is just repeated addition of multisets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoWGfjYv-cQ

>>7532026
lol wut

>>7532018
This is undefined

>>7532018
You know, there were times when they killed for saying things like that

>>7532018
a philosophical statement.

>>7532117
>Hint: pentagram was their symbol, yet they weren't devil worshipers.

(e^(pi * i)) + 1 = 0

Nothing but the successor function actually exists.

>>7532018
Wouldn't it just be represented as epi?

>>7532151
>epi
>not pie

>>7532123
>implying

we're all devil worshippers

the freemasons have infiltrated every major religious organization in the world with the goal of iindoctrinating all the sheep to the will of Lucifer

>>7532018
That's what calculus was made for.

>>7530549
Real Answer:

Multiplication is the comparison of ratios.

The ratio of 2 to 1 is that 2 is twice the value of 1. The ratio of 3 to 1 is that 3 is triple the value of 1. The ratio of 6 to 3 is that 6 is twice (2) the value of 3.

Why is it important to think of multiplication this way? Vectors, and vector multiplication. A vector can be described as a magnitude and a phase. Vector multiplication is the process of adding the phases and magnitudes in such a way as to perserve the ratio to the unit vector, and this process satisfies all the rules of normal number multiplication, though it should be thought of the other way around, as numbers are scalars which are vectors with only a magnitude and no phase. Complex number multiplication also satisfies this idea of vector multiplication.

>>7532048
>implying division exists
You're multiplying by a fraction don't you forget it

>>7532048
>le asains are smart meme

fuck off reddit chinks stink and can't into english

>>7532296
Yes, which is then divided

2*(1/2)=(2/2)=1

>>7532364
Yeah. Just look at all those brilliant white english and gender studies majors!

>>7532291
You should not forget to mention that this is not for just any vector space; it's for normed on a vector space that respects a total order on the field it is over.

>>7532220
>>7532220
They weren't the freemasons. It was a much, much older organization. But you're right - their indoctrination reached almost every person in the world.
Heck, they even indoctrinated the freemasons.

>>7532797
Not that guy but are you trolling about Euclidean stuff? idk

>>7532145
how does the successor function "exist"?

>>7532812
Very close

>>7532048
>implying subtraction isn't addition
>implying division isn't repeated addition
>implying division isn't multiplication

.

>>7532123
Pythagoreans.

>>7533878
Finally!

>math isn't just le thinky thinky think think with numbers

>>7532797
I feel like you're talking about greek mystery religions, but my occult and esoteric knowledge isn't what it used to be.

>>7532093
>>7532021
>>7532120
>>7532231
Wrong
>>7532018
What I think you're asking is the closest measurable rational approximation of e added to itself 3 times, then for some rational approximation of pi-3, you would add e to itself some integer numerator amount of times, then subtract e from itself some integer denominator minus one times.

More clearly:
Let e be a rational approximation of euler's constant to the most significant digit allowed by geometric analysis. Let m/n be a rational approximation of pi -3 where m and n are both integers. Then e*pi = e+e+e+e*m - e*(n-1)

>>7533916
I have no idea why you're on this board but I like you

>>7534026
that's not equality. unless you use actual real numbers (read: cuts or sequences) you aren't getting equality but shitty approximations

>>7532018
e as a Taylor series, and pi as arccos(-1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_trigonometric_functions#Infinite_series

Also, you need pi to calculate it :^)