[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 23 KB, 489x423, 1426553097416.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7512519 No.7512519 [Reply] [Original]

Why are all women such sluts?
You'd think that if we have always lived in a horribly patriarchal society, then surely we would have killed and pruned the females off who wouldn't commit to monogamous relationships (or at least relationships with only one male), so then through what would've been thousands of years of artificial selection, females would naturally seek one and only one male to be with, but yet they don't.

>> No.7512526

Dad runs off, girl lacks male figure in life, at a time when people hide in houses all day, grows up with a psychological and chemical need unfulfilled. Will do anything to get attention, but no amount is actually enough.

But it's exaclty that trait that made them so easy in the first place, so...

>> No.7512532

>>7512519
>women won't sleep with retarded smelly autist OP
>WOMEN ARE ALL SLUTS
Is /sci/ spelled /r9k/ now?

>> No.7512536

Gonna put on my evolutionary psychology hat here:

Males's evolutionary fitness increases linearly with their number of partners. That is, the more females they mate with, the more children they have. Thus, sexual selection drives males to mate with as many females as possible.
Females however, due to the higher costs of gametogenesis and gestation, will bear the same number of children if mating with one male as if mating with ten males; an increase in mate numbers does not correlate to an increase in mate fitness. Fitness for females is maximized by being choosy about who one mates with, so as to ensure that her limited number of offspring has the highest possible quality of genetic material.

The above is true of typical mammals. However, in humans and other animals where intensive parenting is required from both, drivers for male promiscuity are damped down by the need to rear offspring. Rather than humping anything that moves in the hope of having more children, male humans restrict themselves to fewer mates so as to ensure some basic level of quality for their offspring. Females face a similar dilemma, but the factors of their success remain less about the number of mates and more about the quality of mates.

And that's why men (always looking for something on the side) and women (always looking for the next better deal) are sluts.
P.S. you're a slut too

>> No.7512543

>>7512536
>P.S. you're a slut too
I think OP would have to at least have had sex first for that to apply.

>> No.7512549
File: 211 KB, 900x790, artificial_womb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7512549

>>7512536
The consequences are not equal, like you seem to imply, for the simple fact that maternity is unquestionnable.
A man cheating results in drama and nothing more. A woman cheating results in nihilism, the end of her mate's bloodline.

This is like comparing rape and murder. Both are heinous crimes, but murder is obviously worse by several orders of magnitude.

>> No.7512648
File: 1.05 MB, 3341x2273, 1426037208629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7512648

>>7512549
what if you rape a baby and murder a really sick old man?

>> No.7512654

>>7512536
>evolutionary psychology

Yeah, I can make up stuff too.

>> No.7512656

>>7512654
>>7512536

and there's definitely no hat for that!

>> No.7512808

>>7512519
>Why are all women such sluts?
If I was a woman I would be a huge slut, after all I'm suprised how unslutty most women are.

>> No.7514297

>>7512519
I've known a couple of women who weren't sluts, but they weren't interested in men.