[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 118 KB, 560x500, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7443249 No.7443249[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>pure science major at a state university thinks he's smarter than an engineering major at MIT, Caltech, or Standord
/sci/ in a nutshell

>> No.7443254
File: 48 KB, 392x293, 1433414745001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7443254

>>7443249
>yfw OP is so self-conscious about being a engineer in a fucking state school that he tried to bait his friends

>> No.7443255

>>7443249
>tfwywn be an enginurn stoodent at Standord

>> No.7443258

>>7443249
An engineer at a state school is smarter than pure science major.

The only possible exception to this rule is that a pure science major at a top 5 school is is smarter than state engies.

>> No.7443263
File: 2.33 MB, 2000x2000, Bagel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7443263

>>7443249
>tfw being an ivy league math physics double major on sci

>> No.7443275

>>7443263
Saying "ivy league" is just code for "not one of the ivy leagues that's actually good for tech".

>> No.7443282
File: 66 KB, 741x643, iq-by-college-major-gender.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7443282

>>7443258
Oh, if only I didn't have a handy dandy graph for this.

Bask in the intelligence difference between <span class="math">\underline {\overline{\cal{PURE} \; \;\cal{SCIENCE}}}[/spoiler] and pleb majors.

>> No.7443283

>>7443275
Which ones are those

>> No.7443291

CAN WE NOT
FUCKING
ARGUE
OVER
WHO HAS THE BETTER DEGREE?
WE'RE ALL DUMBFUCKS POSTING SHIT ON 4CHAN INSTEAD OF ACTUALLY STUDYING

REEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.7443334

>>7443249
I soon will have my PhD in high energy physics. I still feel like a dumbass barely pulling through in life.

>> No.7443342

>>7443283
Dartmouth I think? But really none

>> No.7443361

>>7443334
From what school

>> No.7443367

>I judge people for going to state school
For what reason?

>> No.7443369

>>7443367
They're idiots

>> No.7443375

>>7443282
That graph is based on something like fucking SAT/GRE scores iirc, it's ridiculously wrong and biased, also grouping civil and industrial tards with chemical and nuclear is retarded.

>> No.7443379

>>7443361
TU Darmstadt, Germany.

>> No.7443393

>>7443379
Why aren't there any German universities on top university ranking lists?

>> No.7443408

>>7443393
I don't know. Depends on which lists you mean.

>> No.7443427

>>7443393
Because the rankings are shit

>> No.7443441

>>7443291
true words

>> No.7443469

>>7443369
that doesn't answer the question

>> No.7443845

>>7443282
"Applied" mathematicians bringing us down again, I see.

>> No.7443874

>>7443469
I judge idiots

>> No.7443880

>>7443845
Nah it's more likely the 'math majors' who get a bachelors and then go on to teach middle school kids.

>> No.7443909

>>7443880
A lot of people overestimate their ability to do pure math and think they can get a professorship and end up teachers when they realize you have to be a genius to do that shit

>> No.7444756

>>7443255
Toplel /sci/ post 2015. Can't stop laughing; going to the doctor in the morning.

>> No.7444760

>>7443249
>Engineering students think they're smart anywhere.
lol'd so hard I had to develop a mathematical model to explain said laughter, incidentally it was beyond the understanding of engineers.

>> No.7444778

>>7443291
But every thread on /sci/ has to be about academic dick measuring over actual accomplishment.

>> No.7444786

>>7443369
And people who expect to make returns on studying at an expensive private school that won't ever land them a job aren't idiots?

>> No.7444791

>>7443393
Because some cuckold from America thinks that American schools are the best