/sci/ - Science & Math

That's actually pretty cool though

>>7428407
>pepe
>sci

really anon, you arn't one to joke about how lame self-identification is.

>>7428424
>sadfrog
>pepe

pick 1

>>7428407
Not /sci/.

>>7428407
>playing trivial pursuit a few year back, science edition or something
>astrophysics topic
>question loosely translates in "What physical equation allows for the existence of black holes?"
>pokerface at the way the question is written, implying reality follows theory and not the other way around
>answer "Einstein's equation"
>"Correct, Anon. it was E=MC2"
>mfw they don't know what Einstein equation is
>mfw e=mc^2 is actually the non relativist limit of the actual equation
>mfw the actual equation has nothing to do with black holes anyway
>mfw the 2 is not even superscripted

>>7428889
Actually it does if you believe that there is a minor singularity within the black hole
Where all matter and particles are accelerated past the speed of light and are put in a dense state of a minor singularity creating a pure ball of energy

>>7429090
Of course. It is so obvious now. Thank you, anon.

>>7429122
Can't tell if your being sarcastic or not

>>7429169
I was yes, because I had exactly the same problem for your comment but then I assumed you were trolling / mimicking I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE plebs.
>believe
>past the speed of light
>pure ball of energy

>>7429209
> believe ( that's stephen hawking a view on the black hole)

> past the speed of light (yes past the event horizon nothing escapes not even light therefore matter is accelerating faster than the speed of light.)

>pure ball of energy ( yes the premise of the Big Bang theory says that the singularity was pure energy )

Mfw when this fagget doesn't get theoretical physics.
Go read a book on the astrophysics and the Big Bang theory you might learn a thing or to.

>>7429221
*two

>>7428889
were m and c in uppercase as well?

>>7429090
>accelerated past the speed of light

>>7429221
>accelerating faster than the speed of light

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but there is no limit to the acceleration of an object, only that it's speed cannot exceed c.

>>7429239
Newtonian physics and special relativity break down when theoretical physics try to apply them at black holes

So things such as passing c is possible in THEORY.

>>7429234
Quoting me and putting retarded gifs isn't a good answer

Either reply logically or gtfo to /x/

>>7429221
> believe ( that's stephen hawking a view on the black hole)
Belief is belief, whoever you are. Taking someone's unproven idea and treating them like fact is just being a fanboy. You're just pleb who likes having someone to worship.
Also my point was that your sentence in the previous post "it makes sense if you believe that" is fucking pathetic.

> past the speed of light (yes past the event horizon nothing escapes not even light therefore matter is accelerating faster than the speed of light.)
I'm actually laughing, now. You are comparing the magnitude of an acceleration (units of m/s^2) with the magnitude of a velocity m/s).
Also what you MEANT to say was that matter became faster than light and therefore can't escape the black hole (thus creating an event horizon). Which is not true at all. In our frame of reference, matter actually moves slower and slower the closer it gets from the event horizon.

>pure ball of energy ( yes the premise of the Big Bang theory says that the singularity was pure energy )
You don't understand anything. Your use of the word "was" shows that you think time was defined before the big bang, which it was not, so just for that you're busted.
Also my point was that you used the word "ball", implying that energy has a shape, which it has not because it is a scalar quantity. Only matter has a shape (this, and abstract mathematical objects constructed by man such as "space").

>Go read a book on the astrophysics and the Big Bang theory you might learn a thing or to.
I'm actually a 3rd year astrophysics PhD. granted, my domain is MHD and not GR, but I know enough to tell you you're full of shit. You're the one who "read a book or two" and think you know ? understand things.

>>7429257
>posts sage pic
>doesn't sage

>>7429328
>3rd year
>phd
lol

>>7429221
>pure energy

>>7428407
>I'm too creative to be a scientist XD

>>7428424
>a meme from an anonymous board somehow being a poster's identity
>anonymous board
>without identity
he's fine

>>7429356
There are non shit-tier countries were you do a real thesis in a limited time, and not some 6 months worth job that you actually complete in 2 to 7 years and call it a PhD. Deal with it faggot.

>>7429356
My proffessor was actually 3rd year

>>7429434
The aforementioned professor was actually from a shit tier country though

>>7429450
>aforementioned professor
Yeah, who?

>>7429499
The one I mentioned in the top half of that comment

>>7428407
Who are you quoting?

>>7429649
Anyone who is using facebook and going to not science related uni.