/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7216094
I am right on the middle ground between J and P, But I qualify as both depending on the day.

>>7216114
Haha I'm exactly like you. We should hang out sometime :)

>>7216094
Stop labeling yourself idiot. All this bullshit about labeling yourself an introvert or extrovert just leads to justification of behavior like "no, I'd rather stay in, I'm an introvert." or "I got to go out, I'm an extrovert." rather than just doing whatever the fuck you feel like because you actually feel like doing it either way.

>>7216120
My interest in MBTI is in Jung's original functions (cognitive theory), not the bullshit dichotomy model (behavioral theory). I'm INFJ, this just seems like an INTJ place.

>>7216094
Of course there will be people that will seem more extroverted or introverted but to label them is simply just evaluating them and causes them to evaluate themselves as well as such which can lead to irrational behavior which might not be part of them naturally.

>>7216126
Labeling yourself in general is idiotic. It limits yourself, it makes you things you can and can't be, just be yourself, the only label to that is your name.

>>7216132
Labeling yourself is stupid if you are obstinate & inflexible about them and do not account for change.

>>7216094
I was but then I realized the futility of it

>>7216132
This post reeks of counter-scientific thought.

Of course labeling yourself is okay. Carl Jung's cognitive theory is extremely useful in learning about yourself as well as other people and why they behave the way they do.

For example, I get worn out in parties and need to recharge at home for a while when I do because such a daunting task quickly depletes the slowly-replenishing acetylcholine levels in my brain. Extroverts rely on a different transmitter - dopamine and adrenaline, so being at a party would -recharge- them, which gives them the opposite effect. You can imagine that different people also have different blood pathways in their brain and that also helps dominate their preferred cognitive functions. I happen to be an INTJ. You sound like an INFJ.

ENTP yo.

I guess i am INFP. But i could be INFJ or INTP too. Its weird because although i am very sensible i also tend to value logic and rationality above empathy.

INTJ

I would certainly describe myself as the mastermind

>>7216203
/thread

>>7216205
can't /thread your own post faggot

>being I-
>being a loser
>believing in MBTILGBT tests
>believing that being INTJ makes you smart
>believing in the smart-but-lazy delusion
>inb4 projecting


Not for me thanks.

>>7216210
what's the matter, did he bump your fedora m8?

Am I an INTJ?

>>7216465
depends, are you a mastermind my friend?

I'm INFP.
It kind of fits. Many authors are INFP and writing was always some kind of dream job for me, but I never actually tried it.
Somehow I still ended up in university and focused more on tech and science than anything else. I forcefully punched the math into my head.
I still wonder how much potential I wasted by not following and improving my actual talents.

Personality types are ineffective and pointless. People are a constantly changing combination of their genetics and their experiences, and trying to put them into types at all is never going to work, but trying to group all human personality into only 16 archetypes is offensive to all of mankind. Jung, but mostly his butt buddy Freud, are responsible for not only major public misconceptions about the human mind, but also (opinion here) the death of almost all valid literary criticism and other such analyses, which now place an anal-retentive emphasis on sex and dichotomies, just like that fucker Nietzsche. It has pervaded society so much that there is a large group of people that believe they are the wrong "gender" because they don't fit into the stereotypes of their sex and feel the inescapable societal pressure to find another archetype that they must fit into instead.
In short, fuck you and your personality test

I'm INTJ it doesn't really mean anything other than giving a few pointers about what I'm most likely to be like as a person. But no two INTJs are the.

For interests sake I'm a double major in quantum physics & pure math

I got INTP according to some survey.

I got INFP on another

I'm either a logical thinker who is really into art and expressive shit or an artist who thinks logically too much.

This board's inherent hatred of philosophy seems sorta xxTJ.

They want definitive answers not open ended questions.

>>7216094
I am a Taurus, OP. Thanks for asking.

>>7216726
>Freud and Jung are somehow responsible for transgendered people, who have been recorded to exist since ancient times

I agree that those two are psuedoscientists, but your point is complete non sequitir.

Has anyone got a link for a test?

>>7216094
>>>/reddit/

Someone give me a fucking link

>>7218502
http://www.16personalities.com

>>7216789
>This board's inherent hatred of philosophy seems sorta xxTJ.

I've always thought it was more ExxJ tbh. I always get a strong sense of lack a of introspection (possible autism no joke) from some of the posts here.

>>7218544
>4chan
>extroverts
>4chan
Yeah, nope.

>>7216789
>>7218544

>trying to draw conclusions about the users personality from shitposts on an ugandan moonshine discussion club

I'm an INTJ bordering ISTJ.

intj reporting in

i actually like the mb typings. it's like fake science horoscopes.

>>7216781
>believes in the left brain vs right brain myth

ENTP anyone?

>>7218544
related to the autism thing, I'm an intj who has known and fit in with autistic social groups all my life. i was never diagnosed, but i always took the tests/talked to therapists in a way that would make sure i wouldn't be diagnosed. to be honest i couldn't be sure if i am or not. generally I'm methodical and domineering except when or comes to approaching women. i always psyche myself out. (that's not to say i haven't had gf's, I've just dated less than other guys my age)

any other intj feel this? everything is easy as shit except romance.

>>7216094
Most of /sci/ is ST, but the NTs are basically the geniuses of /sci/ and they're rare on even this board. You would probably find a lot of NTs on the lesswrong website.

my zodiac sign is leo
my somatotype is mesomorph
my MBTI type is INTJ

all these are equally valid classifications

>>7218599
lol homo

>>7216094
Me but I had forgot what characteristic does INTJ held since I done a self-check 3-4 years ago.

>>7219632
The typical tech/computer/science-interested somewhat-above-average-intelligence guy is INTJ. Quite common on 4chan. Probably underachiever, possibly aspie or NEET.

>>7219644
But I'm civil-engineering

>>7216094
i lost interest in this when i got entp the last time i took it and the first time i got entj

>>7216094
Barnum effect, fuck off back to /b/

>>7219656
granted both are right i just don't like it being so inconsistent

All of us.

INFJ here ;_;

>>7219726
Hello brother