/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7109251

mount a fleshlight to an atlas and boom, sexbot.

>>7107593

>>7109251
Soon.

And then you will not be a virgin anymore.

>>7109267
>fucking a doll makes you not a virgin
>this is what neets actually believe

>>7109271
try harder virgfag

you know that is your only option

>>7109251
They already there. But they called vaginapeople and run with air and romance. Kinda difficult to keep them clean and shit, but if you catched one with your pokéball, all you need to do is let them out onto your bed and tell them you're their master know. And if they want to become level 100 they have to fuck you. But keep in mind that not every vaginamon has the same stats and some are better at running low on romance or air, while others are better at getting to level 100.

Any robot is a sexbot if you have sex with it.

>>7109251
If they ever do, you know they'd be more expensive than just banging a hooker.

>>7109401

That would make it different than every single other automated task.

>>7109271
Does fucking dozens of dolls make one not a slut?

>what is a vacuum cleaner

They won't, they'll be outlawed because it will devalue real pussy.

>>7109401
Yeah, but you don't own a hooker.

>>7109482
But I do have a toaster. Suffice it to say I'll be toasty tonight.

>>7109477
They'll actually be pretty damn essential to slow population growth to sustainable levels, it's not like SJWs even want to have sex anyways...

>>7109477
>They won't, they'll be outlawed because it will devalue real pussy.

Very unlikely. Prostitutes don't have much lobbying power.

>>7109500

Everything about this post is dumb.

>>7109504
But feminist do, they scream loud enough that people listen.

>>7109507
Oh gahd not another pim/pol/.

>>7109477
I can see the opposite happening. Women mainly need a stick to feel good. Male sexbots should be easier to manufacture. Not to mention all the gay dudes.

But anyway, first things first. Cooking robots when?

Domestic bots will become a reality first. As in bots that can take care of the house. They can do all the cooking and cleaning.

Then eventually domestic bots with a vageena will happen. It will more than likely be after market with a software upgrade to enable sex. Because any company that outright sells a sexbot will have a bad image.

I don't see this happening anytime soon. It will more than likely be 75+ years till our robotics are advanced enough that a single robot is robust enough to do all house hold chores.

Sorry man, i don't see it happening in our life time.

>>7109500
but you know we could put whole earths population on a area of texas and even then everyone would have fucking 100 square meters for themselves. and you could actually feed that person by CULTIVATING VEGGIES ON THEIR FUCKING 100 SQUARE METERS USING HYDROPONICS

>>7109528
>Cooking robots when?
that will still take some time unfortunately, like 20 years i think. so for now one just has to keep a woman.

>>7109550

Where is all that hydroponic tech and infrastructure coming from if every square meter on earth is occupied by human subsistence farms? Is every other species extinct in this scenario? Can people leave their 100 m^2? Where does your poop go?

>>7109537

Why would I want to have sex with my automatic toilet cleaner?

>>7109528
Man are turned on by sexy female body, women are turned on by high social status.
What do you think is easier to reacreate in a sexbot?

>>7109556
did you read his post retard? humans are only occupying an area the size of texas, the entire rest of the planet can be reserved for hosting other gay ass species, all the infrastructure for building hydroponic subsistence farms and your poop.

>>7109528
>I can see the opposite happening. Women mainly need a stick to feel good.
Think of the stigma of a woman purchasing a dildo vs a guy purchasing a fleshlight. They'll start of heaping scorn on guys who buy female sexbots then outlaw them after some sob story about a guy who bought one shaped like a child before going on to rape real children.

>>7109578
>humans are only occupying an area the size of texas

That's at current population levels. He was arguing there's no such thing as overpopulation, since we could fill the whole planet with that if we needed to. Or at least I assume that's what he was implying, otherwise his post makes no sense.

In any case, overpopulation or lack thereof has nothing to do with sexbots.

>>7109585

So much projection...

>>7109593
In what sense?

>>7109537

>It will more than likely be 75+ years till our robotics are advanced enough that a single robot is robust enough to do all house hold chores.

75 years ago computers didn't exist and robots were a fantasy. Robotics has now reached a point where the only limitation for a robot to do house hold stuff is the software, and by the way CV is advancing extremely quickly. I can see you being "realistic", I can see you being "pessimistic" too, but 75+ years? Just...how?

Here's a reasonable prediction:

expensive, primitive house hold robots - 10 years from now, 15 at worst

relatively cheap, extremely efficient house hold robots in the mainstream - 20 years from now, 25 at worst

>>7109251
Soon anon, soon!

>>7109593
But he's right. Modern law is set in such a way that one person can ruin everything for literally everyone else.

>9/11
now we all have to deal with the TSA

>those frat boys
campus rape laws tightening

>school shootings
gun grabbing

It's not that hard to see something similar happening with sexbots, especially since women find it creepy.

>>7109251
i never understood this idea. how hard is it to find someone to have sex with? i mean holy shit. I see fat neckbeards with gfs all the time

>>7109768
that's not the point. A sexbot lets you avoid all the useless bs that you have to do before sex.

>>7109768

>sex bot doesn't get pregnant.
>sex bot doesn't give you a disease (assuming you clean the damn thing).
>sex bot doesn't withhold sex from you.

Seems like a good to me.

>>7109793
>(assuming you clean the damn thing).
where do you think you are.jpg

>>7109768
This. I never get whether these sexbot posts are jokes or really serious. I can't find anything appealing in fucking a robot. The idea is just pathetic. I actually like being with girls. Much more than sex honestly (inb4 ur gay). Sex by itself is hollow, I might just as well jerk off. But I guess I'm the only one here that hasn't made exclusively bad experiences (=no experiences) with girls.

I think sex bots will do a lot for mental health than people realize.

Personally I wish doctors would prescribe sex. It's natural and stress-relieving. What creates stress is social stigmas and expectations when it comes to it.

>>7109251
That "sexbot" is horrible. Why would you ruin a titty by running a vent through it. Or whatever fuck it is, the titty doesnt have a joint, why is that shit there? Cut my hand trying to cup a titty and I'll sue the manufacturer.

>>7109768
> not being attracted to robots

>>7109815

you're a normie, it's completely fine if you don't understand.

>>7109817
More importantly, it's impossible for it to stretch its legs.

>>7109251
Please define "sexbot". What capabilities specifically are you looking for regarding physical and mental prowess of the machine. As many people have mentioned, you can strap a fleshlight to any robot and have sex with it. If you're looking for something more advanced go with >>7109537 and avoid >>7109625 as he is a retarded "MUH EXPONENTIAL GROWTH"er who doesn't know what he's talking about. But again, you'll have to be more specific if you want a meaningful discussion.

>>7109831
Good point, this "sexbot" is all kinds of defective. I bet it has a penis somewhere.

>>7109815
really? I don't wanna sound sexist but i think most women are stupid bitches and if it wasnt for sex i wouldn't spend any time with them

>>7109817
I just wanted to chose a picture that makes it obvious that this is in fact a robot

>>7109850
>I bet it has a penis somewhere.
>implying that's a defect

>>7109842
obviously, not only a sexdoll.
Such a robot should also be able to fullfill mans desire for warmth and companionship.
In ideal case, it should simulate a perfect girlfriend

>>7109878

This, but this won't happen for at least another 40 years. I'll probably be in my 70s which is fine for me.

>>7109401
The extra money would be worth it though.

>>7109482
Speak for yourself.

>>7109401

Short-term, yeah. However, long term, we wouldn't need to spend even more money on the robot like we would with a real girl, so it will even out eventually then become cheaper.

>>7109874
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RbTiAE4buw0

>>7109893
That thing looks just creepy.
I think sexbots will look distinctivly non-human to aviod the uncanny vally

>>7109887
to bad that with 70 you wont have the sexdrive to satisfy your robot waifu

>>7109899
People fuck blow up dolls and don't seem to care.

>>7109900
I can't wait for the age of cybercucking

>>7109899
I got you buddy. Check out this hotness.

>>7109901
does this look human to you?

>>7109902
wait no longer

>>7109903
imagine getting a handjob by that thing

>>7109911
Or losing your hand-"job" to it.

>>7109913
i bet this is some sort of cuck fantasy

>>7109887
>40 years
>Perfect simulation of a person
lmfao you singularityfags are so god damn delusional.

>>7109916

>>7109900
We'll have anti-aging meds by then.

>>7109916
He gets all the ladies.

>>7109768
>>7109815

>>7109903
>Implying you wouldn't a Drossel von Flügel

>>7109919
>perfect

hell no

>>7109943
Oh my...

>>7109878
>>7109887
You don't have to wait for the AI. A physical replica of a woman would be enough fun for most of us.

Imagine an object that looks and feels exactly like a real woman. Skin, hair, boobs, ass, pussy, weight, warmth etc. Just lying on your bed when you get home every day.

>>7109893
Actually, I would say that it's convincing enough that it's right on the edge between the uncanny valley and looking normal. J-just a few more years to wait...

>>7109952
I don't want a dead body in my bed.

>>7109962
She'll have AI and will be moving around and looking at you, but it will be weak AI for the first few decades.

>>7109962
I would prefer an actual person too, but seeing as how we've gone back to having harems...

>>7109962
I do.

>feminist sjw's claim all men are rapists
>flip a shit when men would rather have sex with dolls than try to court them

every sexbot thread i see on 4chan devolves into bitching about women and sjws. you guys really like to create conflict where there isn't any.

If the AI is good enough that "she" is convincingly human, she won't want to have sex with you any more than a human would.

>But what if I'm a sperg and have no idea how humans behave anyway

Aha, a loophole...

>>7110018
> not programming them to be whores
whores don't love you, but good ones make you think they do

>10 years from now
>personal robots are common
>slutbots on every corner
>a bang for $10
>boys in school visit local slutbot every recess
>being a virgin after age of 12 is unheard
We were born too early.

>>7110012

>implying women and sjw's buttrage is not an inevitable consequence of sex robots

what will women do when they can't dangle pussy over our heads, I wonder? go back to being good little slaves perhaps?

>tfw so beta you get friendzoned by a sexbot

>>7110045
yeah this is the kind of comment i'm referring to. you're constructing an opponent for yourself where there otherwise is none. it's kind of pathetic.

>>7109251

>>7109768
>how hard is it to find someone to have sex with? i mean holy shit. I see fat neckbeards with gfs all the time
First of all, physical attractiveness isn't the main thing a man needs to get a girlfriend.

That aside, it's about:
- sex with physically perfect women who want everything you want in bed
- sex without negotiation (no gifts, no paying for entertainment, no promises of fidelity, no promises of support, no compromise on sex acts, no letting her redecorate)
- sex without consequences (no STDs, no paternity suits, no psycho jealous exes, no psycho bitches)

Asking why anyone would want a sex bot is like asking why anyone would masturbate. Sometimes you either don't want the emotional connection, or it's too much bother to arrange it with someone you want.

>>7110045

No one has ever or will ever "dangle pussy over your head." And if someone tried, you would have to be super weak and pathetic for it to work.

>>7110050

what part of 'inevitable consequence' do you not understand?

or are you just completely oblivious to the current state of sexual dynamics in the western world?

>>7110053
Fukken /Thread

>>7110057
yeah i'm sure you're really in tune with "the sexual dynamics of the western world".

>>7110057
faggot

>>7110063

more than you, apparently

sex bots will be spun by the liberal media as 'the epitome of misogyny and rape culture' despite the fact that men will be having less and less contact with women once sexbots become affordable

expect to see a rise in 'herbivore' culture when this happens as well

birth rates will decline. research into alternative conception techniques will accelerate. household income will drop while per-capita income rises. marriage rates will drop sharply. new wave of feminist ideology will arise claiming that 'women and girls are being threatened with extinction' as the sex-selective abortion phenomenon hits America and western Europe

and so on.

>>7110076
>a rise in 'herbivore' culture
why the fuck?

>>7110076

I thought posts like this were a joke...?

Are you guys on /pol/ serious?

>>7110076
and i'm sure you can point to similar movements with regards to pornography and onaholes. you're retarded.

In my mind a sexbot is merely a RealDoll with some extra tech thrown in. The hardest part of making a sexbot would be programming it to have believable movements and expressions. I think all of the technology for a basic one is currently available.

>>7110076
Redpill overdose.

>sex-selective abortion phenomenon
non sequitur

>>7110076
I would like this to happend, but doubt it will come during our lifetime.

>>7110096
get a load of this faggot

>>7110084
He's referring to a Japanese pop-sociology concept (which is, I know, strange on this site for fans of Laotian finger puppetry). A "herbivore" in this sense has nothing to do with vegetarianism, but is a man who doesn't pursue women for sexual or romantic relationships. He wouldn't necessarily reject women who approach him, but he has given up on seeking women out, usually substituting a fantasy sex life involving anime, games, toys, and pornography.

As the sexual substitutes for women get better, it's natural to expect an increase in this kind of behavior.

>95 comments

>>7110084
>>7110088
>>7110096
>>7110101
>>7110104
>Taking that post seriously at all
you're retarded

>>7110101

>overall economic and cultural value of women declines
>rising cost of living means having fewer children is financially shrewd
>not having male children to maximize return on investment made in parenthood and minimize risk of loss

It will be even hardly to marry off your daughters when a much better sex toy can be had for a few thousand dollars at the local department store

>>7110147
>overall economic and cultural value of women declines

Women are already better educated and less likely to be unemployed than men. Try again, edgelord.

>>7110096

Pornography and fleshlights are not sex, they are masturbation aids. Nobody is going to turn down a willing woman to go shove their dick in a plastic toy.

>>7110164

Actually what we're seeing now is academic saturation and inflation with respect to women. Women take lower-paying jobs and more part-time jobs than men, which skews the statistics.

And according to the liberal media of which you're no doubt a fan, women still only earn .75 cents of every dollar that men earn :)

>this thread

>>7110165
The majority of 4chan would. Because they are scared of women.

>>7110169

If I was the PC liberal strawman you have conjured up in your head, would I call you a retarded dickless faggot? The economic value of women has never been higher. Hence, you are objectively wrong. That's all I was saying.

>>7109433
>>what is a vacuum cleaner
Something that will tear your penis inside out and suck your nuts out thru it

>>7109251
Question should be, when will there be a worthwhile sexbot that your average male would find enticing enough to consider?
Well probably not anytime soon. So when will there be some weirdo tier horror show? Soon, very soon.

Surprised nobody stuck sensors and hydralics into a realdoll and given it a smart phone for a brain.
An algorithm that clings onto stuff and attempt to hump them isn't the hardest thing ever to conceive of.

>>7109507
>But feminist do, they scream loud enough that people listen.
This man knows
If men don't need women anymore, and especially marriage, family courts, counselling... Then a lot of people will be upset and out of a career.

When will fat angry fedora bots become reality?

Robots are the wrong approach to this in my opinion. Because as someone pointed out it will just be a glorified sex toy. Maybe (I don't know if it's even possible) you could get the robot to change it's whole appearance like in terminator 3 but still there won't be more to it.

Now what would be exiting would be real virtual reality. One that feels actually feels real and that you can experience with all your senses. Now that would be awesome. You could put yourself in any kind of scenario. With a robot there is no real foreplay.

>>7110189

I'd rather be a fedora wearing autist than a divorced cuck that has to give half his income to pay for Tyrone's kid

>>7110189
that's actually not a bad idea. imagine a world where a bunch of semi-sentient robots are acting out funny scenarios in public while being coordinated for extra comedic effect. it could be a great new form of interactive entertainment.

>>7110189
>Regrets

The t-shirts and fedoras seemed awesome until they actually wore them outside.

>>7110189
Femanon here. I can't wait to buy one.

>>7110200
>imagine a world where a bunch of semi-sentient robots are acting out funny scenarios in public while being coordinated for extra comedic effect.
That's pretty much what the world already is.

>>7110197
>muh mommy issues

>>7110195
>Now what would be exiting would be real virtual reality. One that feels actually feels real and that you can experience with all your senses.

Current wave of VR devices are pretty damn good for the visual parts.

>>7110195
>With a robot there is no real foreplay.

Oh dear. Just play a mp3 on the smarthpone in >>7110186 brilliant solution.
Bot be all like "Y0ur cawk iz zo big, pleeze cum3nce th3 v4g!n4L destruct!0n pr0toc0l". If you need more foreplay than that you're simply not a man.

>>7110208

E D G Y
D
G
Y

>>7110225
difficulty curve gets a bit steeper after the visuals are done.

>>7110164
Why don't they make as much then?
>>7110180
Their value has been inflated as the other anon mentioned. Liberal policies are forcing equality where there is none. The market rewards merit, something government cannot force.
The result is women earn less on average.

Stop drinking the liberal/feminist kool aid and study some economics you moron.

>>7110229
I wonder if some kind of non invasive neural interface will ever be possible...or is the skull just too thick for any precise signal to pass?

>>7110229
All we need to build is like this contraption you strap yourself into that is like the "Forceful Articulation Chair" or 'FAC'.
that is a overall that can compress and bend your body as if touched or held by external forces.

Granted it's not a cheap basement build but it doesn't sound like it should be super hard to do with current technology.
Problem is budget and finding a team of engineers that are not gay enough to not wanna do this.

>>7109964
Have you ever fucked a woman who just lays there like a piece of wood?
This is no fun, believe me

>>7110249
that sounds like a really bad idea that would never catch on.

>>7110018
She wouldn't be act like a human, she would act like your ideal girlfriend.
And I bet in your fantasy, your ideal gf wants to have sex with you

>>7110255
It's a little fun.

>>7110051
that looks kinda pathetic

>>7110076
Do you thing this is a good thing?
In the end, the machine will lead to human excintion after all, not through violent rebellion, but from removing any desirve of men to procreate with women

>>7110255
It's so fucking weird when that happens. You're like humping away trying to make the best of a super weird situation
while trying to decide if it's the girl that is deeply religious or your penis that's broken.

>>7110207
i can be your angry fedora bot bby

>>7110259
its better than masturbating but i wouldnt pay any money for it

>>7110243
>Why don't they make as much then?

Various reasons. Maternity leave, less lucrative career choices, societal underestimation, less assertiveness in bargaining, etc.

If you didn't wander into the middle of an argument like a stupid faggot, you'd know I was never actually claiming men and women are the same and equal, only refuting the ridiculous implication that their only economic value is dependent on slutty men wanting to have sex with them.

>>7110255
Can't say I have, they are always quite into it.

>>7110255
>Have you ever fucked a woman
No
I could write a book about masturbation techniques.

>>7110265
I've had that happen once. I got up midway fapped in her shower.

>>7110269
They certainly have economic value, but there is no denying the fact that if the demand for women was lessened somewhat the quality of life for the average woman would see a sharp decline.
The growth of VR tech, Sexbots and so on could very realistically result in a drop in demand for a great deal of women.

>>7110257
You think not? Just imagine playing wrestling games on it, come an anon. Shit's gonna be awesome!

>>7110269
>Various reasons.
One big reason is that a woman, far more than a man, can count on finding a partner that's willing to shoulder more than half the financial burden.

>>7110115
Very informative post. Thank you.

>>7110270
lucky you
believe me, it is no fun
its like talking to somebody who is totally shy and only gives short answeres, so you have do all the work

>>7110260

nigga you are in a sex bot thread

Fuck sex-bots, miniature robot companions when?
pls invent proper AI quick-like.

Or even better, small robot fleshlight/companion?
IT COULD BE SHAPED LIKE A WIENERDOG

>>7110283
no one is going to want to strapped into a device that can forcefully move your limbs around. that sounds really dangerous and awful.

>>7110290
this is some next-level autism right here.

>>7110291
But what if we give it a motor that isn't strong enough to Hulk Hogan you into pieces?
Like it can put pressure on your joints but not so much that your muscles can't resist the motion.

Or there can be like different difficulty settings like normal, hard and nightmare?

>>7109625

Yeah and in the 60s they told us moon motels by the 90s, mate

Things don't always follow an orderly progression or get continually developed forever

>>7110308
Yeah, 25 years its too short. I bet on 40.

I was born too early ;__;

>>7110304
i don't see it happening. if the motors are very weak then it will just be seen as a useless gimmick that can't even do what it's supposed to do, and no one will buy a version with strong motors regardless of safeguards because they could always fail/be hacked. and no company is going to want to make these because of the liability issues in case there is injury. this is just a terrible idea, best to forget about it.

>>7110053

God, what a hollow pursuit. You may think that's ideal but in the end it will be as satisfying as masturbation. Part of the thrill of sex with a real person is conquest, pride in an accomplishment, and the physical and emotional reactions in your body that can only be provoked by another living, breathing, autonomous being.

>>7110290
demn hips
why am i so attracted to it?

>>7110320
Dude, to each his own. You enjoy conquest and this is totally fine.
But for me its mostly the sex and having a companion to whome i have an emotional connection

>>7110326
Because it is rather feminine

>>7110308
>>7110313

Bill Gates was betting on a 30 years frame...in 2006

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-robot-in-every-home/

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2006/12/the_age_of_the_.html

>>7110320
Annnd, an automaton won't be autonomous? It may not need to breathe, but given you aren't fucking a glorified sex doll it'll probably be able to chat you up, and you can't really say it's not conscious because if it;'s perceiving and reacting to stimuli and doing stuff, it pretty much is conscious.

>>7110320
>conquest, pride in an accomplishment
When you fuck a slut on birth control, you haven't conquered or accomplished anything. You've wasted your time and exposed yourself to STDs for nothing.

If she's not on birth control, you've exposed yourself to paternity suits and social pressure to stay with and support her.

>the physical and emotional reactions in your body that can only be provoked by another living, breathing, autonomous being
The body's pretty easily fooled. You're arguing against shitty, unconvincing sexbots, not sexbots.

>>Asking why anyone would want a sex bot is like asking why anyone would masturbate.
>You may think that's ideal but in the end it will be as satisfying as masturbation.
Are you just a complete idiot, then?

>>7110320
>Real sex is about power
checks out.

If we can make sexbots that look and feel as good as the best women then there is no reason besides psychological hang ups to choose a "real" one over the bot.

>>7109267
4chan will not be virgin anymore

>>7110369
Then we shall be unstoppable.

>>7110313

>you are now aware it's been 47 years since the moon landings and not only are there no moon motels, but we actually can't even go to the moon at all anymore

>>7110393
>implying anything related to space race optimism was even remotely economically viable and not just a fantasy
>implying there aren't instead trillions of dollars to be made from this

>>7110393
>but we actually can't even go to the moon at all anymore

kek. We'r on /sci/ here, maybe you should try /x/ or /pol/.

>>7110428

We could do it if we put our backs into it, but there are no extant vehicles for taking people to the moon right now and the custom tools and machining to make Saturn Vs are long gone.

>>7110428
He just means that there's no operating system for landing men on the moon.

Plans to make one are farther off now than they were when Kennedy gave "castrate ourselves with cheese graters" speech ("We choose to go to the moon (and do the other thing [with the cheese grater]) not because it is easy, but because it is hard.").

>>7110409

They said the same thing about space tourism. Listen I agree robots are probably going to figure into the future significantly, I'm just saying long-term predictions of this sort are notoriously inaccurate.

>>7110076
I started reading the sexbot thread and posting my ideas of the 'Forceful Articulation Chair' jokingly since this is such a bizarre topic, I didn't expect to find anything worthwhile here.
However I find the themes suggested in this post interesting, I've long been contemplating the overpopulation issue and find this anons utopian view of sexbots stimulating.

>the sex-selective abortion phenomenon hits America and western Europe
I fail to see how sex-selective abortion is at all related to the prevalence of artificial sexual companionship, anyone got this part?

>>7110442
the problem with space tourism is that we still have no cheap way to get into orbit.
But with sexbot, i don't really see any huge technical barriers.

>>7110442
space anything requires single use rockets and are expensive as fuck because of that.

Sexbots require
>AI, that is developed already because it's useful
>'soft' actuators that don't bludgeon humans to death. Which are also developed because they're usefull.

You can technically strap a fleshlight onto the tool mount of a relatively cheap baxter automation bot, write some software plugins and have it jack you off and it would qualify as a sexbot.

Of course it makes more sense to clad it in lifelike texture before and give VR goggles displaying a hot woman instead of picrelated, but the tech is pretty much here already to some extent.

Of course you really want something like the atlas robot in smaller format with soft skin, but that's still a million dollar prototype level robot.

>>7110260
Just kinda?

>>7109911
In one episode of TBBT that shit happens. Lel

>>7110538
kill yourself.

>>7109850
>claudia
>defect
Other than racial stereotypes and sluttiness, she's got a very nice body.
She's too fat for my personal preferences of a 10/10 but hey... there you go.

Spoon feeding:
http://mrmot31.deviantart.com/art/claudia-sampedroCYBORG-412694933

The artist obviously has made some technical errors but the dude appears to be fledgling at best. Chew him/her out if you want, if you can avoid being sperglord the kid will improve.

>>7110336
>if it;'s perceiving and reacting to stimuli and doing stuff, it pretty much is conscious.

>tfw I might be able to get a robot waifu that reacts to me, converses with me, and loves me sometime in my life

I can't wait. HURRY UP FUTURE.

>>7110621
For the fully realistic effect, it will become more withdrawn and colder, and less willing to spend its time with you, until it finally leaves you to find a more attractive, successful man.

>>7110650
Or it could, you know, push you to do better and be better like a good life partner.

Spend the time while you are asleep researching and accumulating information relative to your interests and processing the best methods for pushing you to achieve something in life.

>>7109251

shoeroner atha nyou thinkk oprobably sadly

>>7110051
I wonder if measurement have been made so that the resistance of the tanga-holder when the user thrusts forward is realistic

>>7109817
Agree. It's rather disgusting.

>>7109251

I don't know why this topic generates so much interest, but at any rate, we could have sexbots now if we wanted. Male sex toys like fleshlights already exist, it would be childs play to add haptic sensors and feedback to them. There is already a growing list of porn sites for the new occulus rift virtual reality headset; all you would need to do would be combine the two. Have a "porn game" with the occulus rift headset and a fleshlight like haptic controller. The fact that it hasn't taken off yet despite being so ridiculously easy to produce makes me very suspicious about the market for such a device. Protip: the vast majority of men want a real women.

>>7109251
>When will sexbots become reality?

When you become a billionare oil tycoon.

IF not, all you are getting is Cop-bots

>>7110932
>we could have sexbots now if we wanted
We can't even do a convincing natural gait, or artificial voicebox. We're a long way from a convincing simulation of a human being as a sex partner.

We already have sexbots, if you just mean some mechanical thing that people use for sex. But that's not what we're talking about.

>Have a "porn game" with the occulus rift headset and a fleshlight like haptic controller.
Oculus Rift isn't even properly on the market yet, and people are already doing this.

>The fact that it hasn't taken off yet despite being so ridiculously easy to produce makes me very suspicious about the market for such a device.
>ridiculously easy to produce
Again: the stuff you're describing isn't on the market. And again: the stuff you're describing is trash compared to what the thread is about.

>Protip: the vast majority of men want a real women.
The vast majority of men want more and better quality women than they can get.

>>7111241
>more and better quality women than they can get.

While you are technically correct I can't help but feel it is insensitive language like this that alienate and aggravate the vaginal part of the population.
Targeting us for their ridicule painting us as simplistic and morbid even though it's actually refined tastes from beholding the good stuff
in internet pornography that is partially to blame. Perhaps we need some subterfuge and sell them in on the advantages instead.

Like pointing out how we don't need bother them in public anymore once they become obsolete as points of interest for recreational copulation.
If we're careful with how we're wording this we might even come off as more lovable.

>>7111311
>I can't help but feel it is insensitive language like this that alienate and aggravate the vaginal part of the population.
>refined tastes from beholding the good stuff in internet pornography
>Perhaps we need some subterfuge and sell them in
>we might even come off as more lovable.
You're sporting an actual neckbeard right now, aren't you?

>>7110053
What if you want an emotional connection, just with a robot?

>>7111346
>You're sporting an actual neckbeard right now, aren't you?

Perhaps a few millimeters it feels like, haven't really been outside the house for a few days. Why do you ask?

>>7111368
please answer this question honestly: do you post on reddit?

>>7109504
Why do you think prostitution is illegal anyways? Hookers are free agents when your average housewife is a cartel member with a lifetime contract.

>>7111373
No, I've never posted on reddit. My only encounter with that site is when googling topics of interest have reveled related reddit pages.

Would I fit into some kind of special demographic if I did?

>>7111373
This.

>>7111311
Seems like it was ripped straight from the depths of reddit. Not only the content but the style. The attempt to appear articulate but coming off as clunky and over compensating is a classic redditor hallmark.

>>7111377
In most western nations besides the USA prostitution is legal.
Sex is the biggest taboo in your country.

>>7111382
yeah the demographic of people i find annoying.

>>7111383
> The attempt to appear articulate but coming off as clunky and over compensating is a classic redditor hallmark.

I see, the clunkynes you experience is hopefully related to me not being a native speaker of the english language.
Altough I've been accused to sound like a 'dusty old academic faggot' by my own countrymen at times. Course, ones saying these cruel things were all alcohol addicts.
As a point of interest I meassured my neckbeard, it's currently at 5mm, I'd say it looks scruffy good somewhere in the borderland into shabby good.

>>7111389
Hopefully you're someone I would enjoy pissing off then. I have a distinct feeling this demographic is very non exclusive in nature.

>>7111401
just fuck off. no one cares.

>>7111420
>Gonna post how I don't care, so anon knows just how much I don't care.

See? Pissing your kind off is instantly gratifying anon.

>>7111386
It was illegal in most countries at some points, women were always lobbying for making prostitution illegal, cause it diminishes their power over men

>>7111935
>there are people who actually think this

>>7109251
Better not be sexualizing my robot daughteru.

>>7111241
>We can't even do a convincing natural gait
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvbAqw0sk6M

>>7111980
>We can't even do a convincing natural gait

That isn't fucking natural. No where close. That looks like a paraplegic physical therapy.

In no way shape or form would anyone think that gait is natural

>fembot
>artificial wombs
>artificial egg cells
Soon no more women, my fellow engineers.
Soon.

2050

>>7113230
what about it?

>>7111980
It looks like a human with hurt ankles.

>>7109251
I would give it a decade to 15 years TOPS.
If the AI were housed in a tower kinda like desktops, then it would go a long way towards making the task of making a robotic endoskeleton fit inside an aesthetically pleasing human shape a lot easier.

The wireless might be a bit finicky, as wireless sometimes is, but it could easily be a placeholder for the five to ten years tops it would take to shrink computer and cooling systems down to a level where they wouldn't take up too much space.

>>7109962
I suggest you dont get married then.

>>7110326
Thick legs and wide hips are an indicator of health and fertility.
Its why a lot of ancient fertility goddess statues had huge hips and tits.
Its perfectly natural anon.

>>7112035

More like, soon women will be free.

>>7113309
Why produce inferior human beings, both mentally and physically, when you have an alternative ?

>>7109815
>I actually like being with girls
you're a fag (not sarcasm/irony)

>>7109815
There are only two types of girls whom I'd want to be with:

1. stupid, but is willing to fuck without any preliminary bullshit, or
2. actually thoughtful and seeks intellectual stimulation and conversation.

Looking for a girl to have sex with will not fulfill either category.

>>7113307
>Thick legs and wide hips are an indicator of health and fertility.

Thick legs and wide hips are a sign of female body type and estrogen influence.

>>7113338

Kinda sounds like you're the fag, fag.

>>7111241
Hang on, you wouldn't need to accurately simulate a human voice box or gate. You'd have an actual pornographic actor act out the game, and then simply play over oculus rift with force feedback applied to a fleshlight like toy. From your point of view you'd be fucking kayden kross, from the outside you'd just be a guy with his head in some goggles and his dick in a sex toy. Maybe I simply don't know the technology enough, but it doesn't strike me as a particularly difficult engineering challenge.

>>7109500
Literally the coup de grace for Japan.

>>7109265
>anon tapes the fleshlight to the bigdog
>powers up his abomination of science, ready to get his freak on
>WHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

>>7110076

Honestly though, who knows what'll happen?

Even right now, we're living in an age of a huge turning point between the male-female dynamics. Not long ago, females didn't even have the same basic rights as men. Now they not only do, but there's also been a sexual power role reversal going on for the past 20 years or so. In some ways, women still have a ways to go with equality, but in others they've actually rushed right past men into a situation where men have less rights than women (childcare, welfare benefits, sex crime accusations, feminist employment quotas, divorce arrangements, public attitudes in general are often biased in favor of women).

Despite this, like 99% of the people, far as I'm aware, seem to be living quite nicely.

The thing with sex bots is that sure, there will be debate over how right or wrong it is, and there will be resistance, mainly from women because women more likely to behave like that. Women in general are more prone to being needy, self-entitled, and have less qualms about whining about it than men do. That doesn't mean they actually feel threatened, it's just what they do. BUT(!) despite all this, for most people, I imagine sex bots will make very little difference.

MOST people have no trouble finding a girl or a guy. Those of us who live to be 40 years old and despite our best effort never catch the eye or interest of the opposite sex, are rare as fuck.

It's important to understand that. To us, sex bots represent the love we don't even dare to dream about anymore. But to most of the world, love is self-evident, and as easy as breathing (even if it does come with drama every once in a while). They don't need the bots, other than to avoid drama or STD's.

>>7109251
It's weird how none of you have brought up the fact that sexbots will meet their toughest resistance from human females. Already women who diverge from the socially dictated forms of relationship building and sexuality are ostracized and reduced much more by other women than men. The reason being that women who sleep with men without strings attached devalue the only currency those women have of controlling men. With that power gone they would have to fend for themselves thus becoming a new underclass far lower than most others because of their inability and unwillingness to work.

>>7114718
It was brought up, multiples times, by multiples persons.

>>7114729

Let him samefag his frustrations over his virginity. He will never have pussy, so let's let him have at least that.

>>7110320
>conquest
>pride
I pity you, for I fear you might never know the true meaning of Making Love with your partner.

>>7114748
Ah but he is correct when he says women being social parasites that will soon become extinct.

PLEASE LET THIS FUCKING HAPPEN

PLEASE LET THIS FUCKING HAPPEN

PLEASE LET THIS FUCKING HAPPEN

damn this thread is pathetic. you woman-hating virgins make me not want to learn about robotics and AI for the sake of furthering this goal.

>>7111940
This is you

>>7109251
why should we have to wait for them instead to be part of the creators, we must improve our EE and CS skills.

>>7115068
sorry but, are you being sarcastic? ...

>>7115403

You are a child.

there is literally one thing preventing sexbots from happening, and its a proper synthetic muscle.

power supply is the next issue, but corded versions will work.

>>7115403
What the fucking fuck is even going on in this comic?

I can't tell who is supposed to be the same person from panel to panel, what order to read the panels in, whether there are parallel storylines going on, or what.

>>7109537
Zoomba, XXX-rated edition

Robots can't give consent.

>>7111996

>nowhere close

you're just mad cause someone gave a convincing refutation

nice bro

>>7116466
do you seriously think that looks like a person walking?

>>7116469

it's not awful

if I saw a person walking like that I'd guess they had some sort of minor disability or something

obviously there's a ways to go before it's seamless, but I definitely wouldn't call it "not even close"

>>7115403
this comic makes no sense

>>7109585
>outlaw them after some sob story about a guy who bought one shaped like a child before going on to rape real children.

Already happened, and it wasn't even a robot!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/police-release-further-details-in-st-john-s-sex-doll-arrest-1.1347551

>This doll has been deemed to be child pornography, it's approximately four foot two

>"We're just very fortunate to be able to take an item such as this off the street," he said.

>The accused is facing charges of possession of child pornography

http://www.hngn.com/articles/48759/20141108/child-abuse-case-man-fighting-charges-for-owning-child-size-sex-doll.htm

>>7118068
How much do you want to bet it came from Japan, and is about as much "child pornography" as stuff that's openly advertised here on blue boards?

Canadian cops are the worst when it comes to things like this. I remember watching this reality show on Canadian border inspectors, where they'd go and search the crew cabins of ships, specifically looking for things that weren't intended to be brought off the ship, into Canada in any meaningful way, and specifically for things people wouldn't realize they couldn't have because they're ridiculously particular to Canadian law, like balisongs and other "scary" knives (which have no practical advantage over knives that are perfectly legal in Canada), and porn that Canadian lawmakers don't approve of.

They specifically focus on the stupid shit that people don't realize is illegal, because people who aren't really doing anything wrong, and therefore aren't afraid of the police, are easier prey.

>>7118122

The second case was in Australia. And it was barely even loli.

>A man from Sydney, Australia is fighting charges for owing a child-size sex doll the size of a 12- to 14-year-old girl.


>14 year old sex doll is prison-worthy

>>7109379

Underrated post.

>>7109251
It would just be a complicated dilldo or pocket pussy.

>>7110316
>and no company is going to want to make these because of the liability issues in case there is injury.
Then how do you explain the fact that companies make cars?

>>7109379
>>7109433
kek

>>7114597
>MOST people have no trouble finding a girl or a guy.
>normie detected
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>7114597
80% of single women are banging chad thundercock

>>7110046
top kek

sure, your girlfriend will finally have a cock she can enjoy

hopefully never

>>7118068
This is about as illegal as computer generated 3d loli porn. That is to say that it's legality is irrelevant because it does not involve any victims that would report you and any conviction would have to come from exaggerated law enforcement or privacy infringement.

Though, admittedly, the physical aspect of it makes it more vulnerable to discovery. But this is just based on current technology. The moment such dolls become modular enough or straight up nanotech it becomes equivalent to digital data.