[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 11 KB, 800x216, Euler-Identity1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7112277 No.7112277 [Reply] [Original]

there can only be one
which one is your favorite?

i like e much better. pi, although extremely *important* just doesnt impress me all that much. its the ratio of circumference to the diameter, uhh okay..?
but number e? it is cool as fuck in my opinion.

>> No.7112281

>>7112277
Nice dubs but fuck off

>> No.7112305

>>7112277
Could you be anymore Science_Fan.jpg ?

I wish sagebombing was still a thing.

>> No.7112320
File: 43 KB, 508x321, natural-triangle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7112320

All 3

>> No.7112333
File: 12 KB, 248x249, doublesguy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7112333

>>7112320
that is so fuckin cool holy hell
>>7112281
thats what the church told galileo

>> No.7112350

>>7112320
Heh, that would've been cool.

>> No.7112882

>>7112333
Nice check!

>> No.7112902

>>7112320
<span class="math">\[e^{\pi}-pi=19.9990999\][/spoiler]

>> No.7112904

>>7112902
oh for fucks sake

<span class="math">e^{\pi}-\pi=19.9990999[/spoiler]

>> No.7112925

>>7112904
if only these constants had these relationships to each other

>> No.7115275

>not
<div class="math">\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{{-x}^2} = \sqrt\pi</div>

>> No.7115306 [DELETED] 

(pi^4 + pi^5) / e^6 = 0.99999999

>> No.7115316

\frac{{\pi ^4+\pi ^5}}{e ^6}=0.99999999

>> No.7115938
File: 20 KB, 410x478, doesitlooklikeicare.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7115938

>>7115275

>cases of residue theorem and using saddle points with complex analysis.

mehhh

>> No.7115953

>>7115938
lol there is a much much simpler way of evaluating that integral and its so clever, if you ask nicely, i can tell you

>> No.7115963 [DELETED] 

>>7112277

<span class="math">∫_{∂Ω}ω=∫_{Ω}dω[/spoiler]

>> No.7115978

>>7112320
>mixing . and ,
>using decimals with degrees

0/100

>> No.7116000

I don't understand why one number would be considered to have greater importance than another number.

>> No.7116015

>>7112277
e^tsint,e^tcost

^most epic shit ever.

>> No.7116017

>>7116000
d(e^x)/dx=e^x
can you say this about any other number?

>> No.7116021

>>7116015
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3De%5Etsint%2Cx%3De%5Etcost
whats so ebic about it

>> No.7116041

>>7116021
its the fibonacci sequence (natural spiral)

>> No.7116044

>>7112320
Interesting but not close enough!

>> No.7116046

>>7116021
You can say lots of things about lots of numbers that other numbers don't have.

>> No.7116079
File: 18 KB, 784x365, ScreenShot207.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7116079

>>7116041
its better if you have sin(5t)

>> No.7116085

>>7115953
plspls tell me

>> No.7116090

Which is more important to math?

I would say e.

>> No.7116098

>>7116085
apparently it is on wiki
i thought i was going to let you in our secret circle of squared polar gaussian integration, but no
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integral#By_polar_coordinates