/sci/ - Science & Math

You don't have to be right about everything to be a good teacher. At that level you don't even need to know all that much about the subject.

>>6984205
teacher are not majors physicists expert, it's not their jobs

they can be wrong, and when it happens, it can be really stressfull for them

stop being a jerk and don't complain because your high school teacher isn't a rocket scientist

Holy shit how is that even possible ?
Well i should become a teacher...seems easy

My chemistry teacher tried to argue that burning a candle was a physical reaction. When I pointed out that the wick was irretrievable, thus making it a chemical reaction, he discarded what I said and yelled at me to stop arguing with the right answer. Melting wax is a physical reaction. Burning a candle is a chemical reaction. Was I right or what?

>>6984245

a flame is pretty particular, it's a place where some intense exothermic oxydation take place. So since it's oxydation, it's chemical. But if you says it's physical you can't be wrong too, chemics reaction isn't enougth to explain the flame.

anyway, chemical reaction it's also physics. Physics sciences is the description of nature.

>>6984205
He is technically right. In LEO there is still some atmospheric drag, so the ISS is needs to fire a rocket every once in a while to stay in steady orbit. The ISS and its astronauts are maintained above the orbital speed in order to maintain a steady orbit.

A coin dropped out of the ISS would be in orbit for a while, because it would still carry the relative velocity from the space station. But without its own source of propulsion, it would slowly decelerate due to atmospheric drag, falling below the orbit speed and eventually fall to the earth.

>>6984208
>right about everything
Not understanding inverse square law as a physics teacher is fucking pathetic.

How have you not realized this yet?
This is some grade 3 shit nigga
If a teacher is good at what he teaches, he sure as fuck won't be working in a school lmao

>>6984262

Sounds like you don't understand any better than he does.

>>6984245
>When I pointed out that the wick was irretrievable, thus making it a chemical reaction
so reversible chemical reactions aren't chemical reactions after all?

you're a dumbass, anon

>>6984288
How in the fuck is burning anything reversible? The wax can be re-molded, but the wick is gone. Charred to shit. Try this one at home.

>>6984245

Wut. You are right in the sense that there is a chemical reaction taking place, but your reasoning is completely retarded, so you get zero credit from me.

>>6984300
come on man, reading comprehension. whether something is reversible or irreversible doesn't determine a chemical vs physical reaction.

>>6984301
>>6984287
>>6984300
Is the wick on a candle not lost after you burn it? It is. As I understand it any permanent change is a chemical change. It's possible to re-mold the wax that melted and wasn't vaporized, but the wick will never be a wick again. The overall action was burning a candle, you can't burn a candle about a wick afaik.

>>6984308
>As I understand it any permanent change is a chemical change
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_reaction

>>6984300
Do you know of an equilibrium reaction? Chemical reactions can be reversible. However burning of a candle is not.
Yea, your reasoning was very bad.

>>6984308
You shouldn't argue with teachers on a subject when you know little about it.

Reactions can be reversible

>>6984308
>As I understand it any permanent change is a chemical change.
cooking meat is an irreversible physical change

>>6984312
Every day's a fuckin schoolday.
>>6984313
What I understood at the time to be a chemical reaction may not have been completely accurate, however we agree that burning is irreversible. Show me a YouTube video or some shit that shows the reversal of a burn. Some reactions are reversible, true, but this is not one.

>>6984319
Wouldn't the odor/color change represent a chemical change? What about protein cells decaying due to heat?

>>6984320
the question was never "is burning reversible", but "does being irreversible mean it's a chemical change."

we've shown you that you're wrong on the second one, and the first was never in dispute. if you want to claim that it's a chemical reaction, you need new arguments besides "you can't put the wick back."

>>6984323
>What about protein cells decaying due to heat?
by OP's criteria, that would be more of a physical change, as the cell membranes are breaking down and all the proteins are getting muddled up together instead of nicely arranged

>>6984319
Noo, cooking is a chemical change.

>>6984329
Why? The wick is the reason it can't be re-arranged into a candle. That's valid reasoning. I was wrong about some reversible chemical reactions but the wick will never be one.

my homeroom and history teacher called me a junkie and worthless when I overdosed in middle school. another history teacher really didn't like me because I was the only white girl. my geography and history profs hated me in highschool because I lived in america for 5 and a half years before that (I know americans bombed our country during the 90s, but it's surely not my fault). my homeroom/art prof thought I couldn't finish highschool.
I'm sure they're all glad to see me studying astrophysics at a university now.

>>6984338
>That's valid reasoning.
and it's reasoning completely unrelated to "is it a chemical or physical reaction".

your reasoning is like someone asked you which way is North and you pointed in a random direction and answered "the sky is definitely blue, so North is that way."

>>6984338
It is funny how you keep trying to defend yourself.

This was never about the wick. You said that for it to be a chemical reaction, it must be irreversible, which is wrong.

>>6984340
The fuck?

>>6984342
But it is related. The burning of the wick is a chemical reaction in and of itself. It pertains to the question because the wick is and will always be part of a complete candle. If the wick isn't present it's not candle. The wick was permanently changed by a chemical reaction (burning).

>>6984340
why did you overdose in middle school? I would probably say that to you too. I mean, you wasted my time making me help you. I have to deal with your shit

>>6984349
>When I pointed out that the wick was irretrievable
It's always been about the wick. Burning it made it an irreversible chemical reaction

>>6984352
>The burning of the wick is a chemical reaction in and of itself.
you have yet to prove that is the case without resorting to arguments about its reversibility.

>>6984351
unclear?

>>6984358
Burning is a non-reversible chemical change. When you burn wood, the carbon in the wood reacts with oxygen in the air to create ash and smoke, and energy in the form of light and heat.
CHEMICAL REACTIONS | Infoplease.com
www.infoplease.com/.../chemical-reactio...
Do you really need me to tell you why burning anything is a chemical reaction?

>>6984352
We've already established that burning a wick is a chemical reaction.

I don't understand why you keep saying that. That isn't what the disagreement is about.

>>6984364
>Do you really need me to tell you why burning anything is a chemical reaction?
no, that's exactly the answer I was looking for from you, and all you needed to say from the start. the answer was never about reversibility, because many chemical reactions are reversible.

>>6984356
on accident. my mom didn't take care of me much due to her problems, stepdad didn't notice me much, so mistakes are bound to happen when you're not fully matured.
those profs wasted a total of 0 time helping me most of the help I did get was from math teachers because they noticed I was bored with the material they were doing so I was a few lessons ahead. I had straight A's in american schools, had mostly A's by the end of highschool as well.

>>6984365
It's not about salt and sodium bicarbonate (the only reversible reaction on the Wikipedia article) either. Tell me where your problem is?

>>6984360
>a homeroom teacher
>overdosing in middle school
>professors in high school

>>6984374
The problem is, that you are wrong in your reasoning. Sorry, but what you said about burning being a chemical reaction is correct but your reasoning as to why isn't.

It is like getting the right answer on a calculus test but you wrote out 1+1=2 as the work you showed.
So, you get no credit.

>>6984375
homeroom is where they get the paperwork out of the way, the teacher you bring your sick notes to and who takes care of all the paperwork related stuff in school.
when in highschool we call teachers professors here.
and i explained the overdose.

>>6984383
Where's "here"

>>6984379
First of all, that's a concept that I have always disagreed with. The answer is the answer, shown work or not.
Secondly, why is
>>6984364
Wrong?

>>6984387
Think of it like this, you published a paper in a science journal and go to a conference to defend/share your findings. On your publishing you wrote "the answer is 23, because potato".

You will get laughed at, learning in particular is more about the process than the answer.

>>6984386
why does it make a difference?

>>6984387
are you in high school OP? The work is always important. You can't be a scientist or mathematician without proof and to do that you need to show your work.

>>6984391
No, Im just wondering

>>6984387
I really hope you are just pretending to be retarded.

>>6984395
it's a shit one, but we did produce tesla

>>6984205
This is every math teacher I have met.

"no number can be smaller then zero" ->negative numbers

"you can't have half numbers" -> Fractions

"You can't solve for this complex vector system, because you aren't using calc 3 methods which you haven't learned yet anyway" -> advanced trigonometry+calc 1+dimensional compressions and expansion functions=right answer every time without calc 3 methods

"That value you keep saying is there doesn't exist and its giving you the wrong answer" ->what is the correct way to do hyper real numeric calculations that accounts for infinitesimal non-zero remainders

One of my history teachers "World War 2 was insignificant to American History so we don't cover it. Now stop asking questions." the sum of ALL my history classes says apparently history stops when Lincoln gets assassinated.

"pentagonal crystal structures don't exist" -> 2 years later sit in on Shechtman (awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2011 for his work on quasicrystals) lecture of Quasicrystal very closely matching my predictions

"F=Ma, should read F=Mass it is a typo in the textbook where F represents Force" -> apparently acceleration has no part in this simple equation

"This is wrong, the melting temperature of gold is clearly stated to be 1064.18 °C at this pressure." -> what is called spending hours accounting for melting point change due to the extreme case of the high surface energy the nano powders we are working with have, taking it down to 1062.7 °C.

Teachers in general saying I don't know what I am doing. Apparently most of the time my methods are all wrong so I lose 80% of my grade, but somehow get 20% because my final answer is always right, even for the extra challenge questions.

>>6984340
>that fucking pic

>>6984288
>>6984301
but irreversible reactions are necessarily not simple physical state-change reactions. his logic is sound; you're just being bitchy because he didn't embed the definition of a chemical reaction in his argument.

>>6984418
OP detected

>>6984414
this one better?

>>6984340
if you overdose ever, you are a worthless junkie.....I didn't think that was hard to understand

overdosing at that young of an age is even funnier, because it means your parents are bad too

congrats worthless junkie anon

>>6984465
cheers man, makes me feel better for being where I am today :^)

>>6984418

No it isn't, samefag. Technically everything is "reversible," just not practically so. Burning a wick is "irreversible" in the same way as smashing a window or mixing a drink, which are not chemical. Zero credit.

>>6984387
>First of all, that's a concept that I have always disagreed with. The answer is the answer, shown work or not.
underage b& confirmed, get off 4chan

>>6984418
no, his logic is not sound, because the question of whether something is reversible is irrelevant to the question. the correct reason for why it's a chemical reaction relies on an understanding of the chemical reaction, and insisting on that point isn't being bitchy, it's being correct

>>6984245
Hopefully you can find peace now that you know you've been wrong all this time.

>Uni Physics Prof
>"You're driving down the road at 70mph in a 55mph zone."
>"A police officer uses radar on you, and flashes his lights at you."
>"You pull over on the side of the road."
>"What is your instantaneous speed?"
Zero, because you're on the side of the road.

>teacher flips out about how wrong it is
>he meant when the cop used radar
Word your questions better, broseph.

>>6984546

>miles
>in a physics class

>>6984560
>America
Our speed limits are in mi/h, and we measure vehicle speed in mi/h

>implying this was something that you actually have to think about
>implying units aren't arbitrary

>>6984369
This is no explanation of the overdose. People don't overdose from parental neglect, overdose is an acute condition resulting from the consumption of a far greater quantity of the drug than what would constitute a recreational dose.

You don't overdose on cannabis, you don't overdose on LSD, you rarely overdose on MDMA (and usually then you die from hyponatremia or else just walk the dinosaur.)

So I'm assuming you overdosed on a depressant since stimulant, psychedelic or disassociative drugs would either have killed/maimed you in overdose or not done enough to even constitute an OD. Most of the stim dinosaur walks are acute and abrupt, i.e seizures + psychosis.

I'm assuming you combined alcohol, benzodiazepenes and opiates. At least two of the three.

And you know what, bitch?

I'm a fucking heroin user.

I like gear. I've also necked my fair share of diazepam, triazolam, zopiclone, zolpidem, alprazolam, etc, etc.

But heroin rarely ever can cause an overdose by itself, and this is borne out by statistics. If you overdose on >the gear
you're either

A. Trying to kill yourself.

B. mixing depressants.

Either way, it's your own fucking fault. Nothing infuriates me more than somebody who can't accept responsibility for their own actions.

>>6984575
Yeah, but why not use physics class to get Americans used to the metric system? It wouldn't hurt, and no other class is going to really get into it that much.

>>6984603
Are you under the impression this was an actual assignment and no a portion of the lecture?

Do you think we didn't use SI for actual calculations?

>>6984625
1/1 examples used miles. That's 100% of the time.

>>6984205
Can we all just agree that ____-ed majors are retards too stupid to get a real ____ degree?

>>6984674
No. Some people want to be teachers, and that's what they do. If you want to teach, it would stupid to do something else because you're insecure about being "just" a teacher.

>>6984674
Math Ed majors take all the same math classes that math majors take.

The problem is when people that don't want to teach get a non-ed degree, can't find a job/burn out, and decide to get their ed certification.

>implying teaching doesn't take a specific skillset that not everyone has
ISHYGDDT

>>6984262
It's not becuase of inverse square law, it's because you are simultaneously attracted towards ISS, Newton's law applies only to the center of mass of the system, i.e the center of mass of you + ISS

>>6984410
>Serbia
>"I was the only white girl in class"

>>6984205
Eighth grade.

My science teacher taught board. He would read his notes from his handwritten book, and copy them on the board while reading them out loud. The class was expected to write everything down in composition books. Every once in a while our books would be handed in, and he would grade them. He would write on three chalk boards, and then erase one, chastising students who were slow in copying everything down.

In one segment, he explained the the planets do not fly out into space because of the gravitational pull of the sun. When a 13-year-old asked why the planets are not pulled into the sun, he could not explain because it was not part of his notes.

I wonder how many students' interest in science was destroyed by him.

>>6984716
Are you retarded?

>>6984342
>>6984349
Retards, to prove his reasoning wrong you need to tell him that chemical reactions can be classified as irreversible and reversible, his reasoning was that it's irreversible therefore it must be chemical, but they are first classified as chemical reactions, then shown to be either irreversible or reversible. The comment about the sky being blue... You're retarded fuck you. He's wrong, many of you can't tell him why he's wrong, fuck all of you

>>6984360
I think he's just astounded, as am I, bravo, though

>>6984473
don't listen to that faggot, congratz on being where you are now!

>>6984418
But it's still sort of working backwards, I agree everyone arguing with him is a dumb ass, but irreversible doesnt define chemical reaction, it should be shown to be a chemical reAction by the definition of chemical reaction

>Sophomore year of high school.
>shit-tier physics teacher
>do stuff about particle physics and quantum mechanics outside of school
>ask him questions about the material
>he has no idea what I'm talking about and tells me to look on the Internet.
>try studying it for another 2 months
>itshardasshit
>give up
Its sad that teachers sometimes have no knowledge of the subject outside of what is taught in the course

>>6984210
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know how gravity works. In all seriousness, I could have answered OP's question when I was in 5th grade. OP you have my sympathy

>>6984730
Because if there's one thing would-be scientists have in common, it's their unshakable faith in their teachers.

The sooner students learn that their teachers are not infallible, the sooner they can begin learning on their own.

>>6984752

>HS physics teacher doesn't know anything about particle/quantum physics
>that makes him shit

you're a dumbass

my HS physics teacher was amazing (actually got recognized for some awards in teaching) and didn't know much of anything about quantum mechanics

there's no reason he should to teach HS physics or even entry college level physics

>>6984752
Why would someone that can go in-depth on particle physics and quantum mechanics be teaching high school? Did they know enough to cover your course work?

>try studying it for another 2 months
>itshardasshit
>give up
Pro-tip: It's probably because you don't have enough of a background in the pre-reqs. This isn't your teacher's fault.

>my professors are primarily geometers
>I'm interested in number theory
I can't blame them for not being able to answer all my number theory questions.

>>6984755
Do you know how gravity works? Explain it, right now. Right now. Three seconds.

>>6984750
Irreversible DOES show that it's a chemical reaction if there are now irreversible PHYSICAL reactions. Holy shit, everyone arguing with the original poster has their contrapositions wrong. Shame on you.

>>6984780
replace "now" by "no".

>>6984769
>>6984773
True, though the fact the he couldn't direct me to any material was disappointing. There was another physics teacher across the hall who knew a lot about both subjects and helped me get interested in it again. I also had a math teacher who knew a ton regarding the subject, but he was incredibly smart
>inb4 why is he a high school teacher
The job gave him more time to study whatever he wanted. I also saw some of his work, he was legit.

>>6984774
>be me
>understand gravity
>coin won't fall back to earth if it is in space station
If the station is in orbit, why should the coin immediately not comply with the rules the Space station follows?
Now tell me what parts of the above statement are abstract.

>>6984782
Replace "by" with "with"

>>6984787
Science teachers are permitted to teach outside their area in most states. What that means is that an Earth Science teacher can be permitted to teach Physics.

The bullshit thing about it is that a Math teacher is not permitted to teach physics, despite actually having a better background to teach it.

>the job gave him more time to study whatever he wanted
Teachers have no more free time than anyone else.

How do you know that he just wasn't interested in the same stuff as you?

>>6984798
But what if "with" were replaced by "by"?

>>6984245
>>6984300
>>6984308
>>6984338
>It's possible to re-mold the wax that melted and wasn't vaporized
>The wick is the reason it can't be re-arranged into a candle
The wick isn't the main substance that is burning, it's the wax. You cannot burn a candle and then get the wax back.

>>6984780
Popping a balloon is pretty much an irreversible physical reaction. In fact, breaking stuff apart is in general irreversible.

>>6984797
It's a reference to a video that got posted on /sci/ once; some autist asked a girl that and as she didn't answer ("i have nothing to proof to you") he started laughing ("Hahahahahaha, she doesn't even know how gravity works! Hahahaha!").

>>6984743
>Retards, to prove his reasoning wrong you need to tell him that chemical reactions can be classified as irreversible and reversible, his reasoning was that it's irreversible therefore it must be chemical
that's exactly what we told him. did you even read the thread?

>You're retarded fuck you
his reasoning was "it's a chemical reaction because it's irreversible". being reversible is not a characteristic used to determine whether something is a chemical reaction. my analogy was appropriate.

>>6984804
>>6984804
>teachers have no more free time than anyone else.
What is summer break

>>6984808
Goddammit

>>6984835
What are conferences, seminars, etc? Summer break for teachers isn't as long as you think.

>>6984804
In most places, teachers get paid more for having an advanced degree. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter the degree, and they take it in teaching rather than the subject.

>>6984849
Teachers are paid less for their level of education than any other field.

>they take it in teaching rather than the subject
Most get a Special Education degree so they can dual cert for Special Ed.

>>6984808
Checkmate, atheists.

>>6984845
Even IF all of those seminars and conferences weren't furthering their knowledge, they would still have more time than the average person

>>6984881
How do you figure?

>>6984881
They also work fewer hours per week than most professionals — even during the school year.

I think teachers should be paid more, simply because we need better teachers, but pretending they're killing themselves for our children is silly.

>>6984888
Do you think papers get graded and lesson plans are created during the school day?

You do realize that teachers are expected to go to extra curricular events as well, right?

Most teachers are working the same 45+ hrs/week as everyone else.

>>6984888
I agree with you regarding the pay of teachers, but the truth is that the reason teachers aren't paid a whole lot is because of the sheer volume of them. As supply goes up, price goes down. It is relatively easy to be a teacher today, but fairly difficult to be a good one. The problem is that we aren't all that good at rewarding the good ones.

>>6984902
That's true, however you are making it sound worse than it is. Teachers have planning periods and teacher work days.

>>6984907
>aren't paid a whole lot is because of the sheer volume of them
It has more to do with them being public sector employees.

Most STEM teaching positions in my area only pull 5-12 applicants, most of which will be continuously passed over for not being good teaching candidates.

>>6984920
That's true, but that goes back to what I said about the sheer volume. It is easy to get the qualifications for a teaching job but that doesn't make you a good teacher. The ease of getting teaching qualifications is the reason there are so many teachers.

>>6984338
Valid reasoning has nothing to do with the truth value of a statement - it only has to do with the structure of the argument. Go back to elementary Logic.

>>6984270
That's not entirely fair. My high school AP physics teacher was an astrophysics PhD, and a certified genius. Scientific research isn't exactly an easy field to break into.

>>6984952
I agree. I just think you have to increase the pay before you can increase the qualifications. Otherwise you're drawing from the same pool, and not enough people will pass. Though I guess a teacher shortage could eventually create the same change.

>>6984902
Actually, I was taking that into account. Even with grading time and other activities, teachers still work fewer hours. I don't have the link at hand, but if you search, you'll find it.

>>6984578
I think you come to conclusions quick.
it wasn't an accident that I was on disassociative drugs, someone in school offered me what I thought was a bottle of water, that's the accident part. it was a bottle of water filled with vodka, but I realized a bit too late due to the high dose of drugs and lack of sleep that night. took about an hour or so before I lost consciousness and they took me to the ER.
I dosed my drugs, we had google then and I used it to be informed about things like that. I still do drugs today, though not very hard ones. addictions are are manageable thing if you're aware of yourself and your addiction. the overdose was a pure accident, those people either didnt realize I was on something (which is doubtful) or they didn't know that those two should not be mixed under any circumstance (which most people don't).
and I'm not blaming my parents for the overdose, I'm blaming them for neglect. I had about a year or so of heavy drug use before that without them noticing. still love my parents very much, they did the best they could and I'm still not a parent so I can't judge really.

>>6984578
walked the dino?

>>6985052
Or if you increase the rigor of becoming a teacher and increase pay, then smarter people will be drawn to it and the uncompitent candidates will fall off. But of course we aren't willing to spend that much money on public education, so the entire system won't change. At least in the south, where I am currently living.

I grew up in missouri and had bio teachers that tried to teach creationism in the classroom and only mentioned evolution because "it's in the standardized tests so you need that knowledge to score high so the school will get more money."

>>6985155
>better scores
>more money
Oh, America, you crazy sonofabitch.

>>6984952
It's more difficult to get a teaching cert than it is to just get a BS in a given field.

>>6985052
This is what we currently see in STEM areas. Most people feel teachers aren't qualified to do other things in their field, when usually the best people in a field will make excellent teachers.

Increase the pay if you want to see better candidates enter teaching programs. Right now you either have people that want to teach, or people that can't really execute in the private sector.

>>6985060
>but if you search, you'll find it.
Useless much? How many hours a day, on average, do you think teachers work?

>>6985113
I'm so sorry. You're right, and the south is terrible.

You don't even need to have any teaching background to teach in most southern states.

>>6985155
There's a reason that Missouri sounds like misery.

>creationism
dem states

>>6984864
>paid less for their level of education
Yeah, just looking up social workers exposes this as a lie.

>>6985324
Just looking at one thing proves a generalization wrong? Holy shit. Just look at you, proving all humans are idiots.

>>6985324
I know a millionaire who dropped out of high school. Thus, education is worthless.

my teacher in first year science thought fluoride was bad for your teeth and didnt know that heat rises

>>6985172
>>You don't even need to have any teaching background to teach in most southern states.
yeah, you fucking do.

last year my roommate tried to get a teaching job in one of the poorest counties in one of the poorest performing states in the nation, and he got turned down because he didn't have proper teaching certification

>>6985355
I think he's referring to alternative certifications. A lot of places with teacher shortages (mostly poor, rural counties) allow you to teach without an education degree if you majored in that field. Not all, but a lot.

>>6984340
You overdosed in middle school, you are a worthless junkie.

I'm helping care for a fatherless girl, she's in the 10th grade now.

If she ever did any shit like that, I would either beat her or guilt her until she beats herself up.
>>6984473
omg your in college studying babby shit wow

>>6985366
Thanks, bro!

>>6985355
Swearing helps prove your point. Seriously though, did you ever consider that area isn't that desperate for teaching candidates?

>>6985324
Do you need a Graduate degree to be a social worker? Most states require teachers to earn a graduate degree within a certain time period.

>>6984411
>World War 2 was insignificant to American History

>>6985391
>Seriously though, did you ever consider that area isn't that desperate for teaching candidates?
I know for a fact it is desperate.

And fuck you.

>>6985403
What degree does your friend have, and is there a chance he presented himself poorly? What state was it anyway?

>>6984411
How dare elementary school teachers NOT teach non-natural numbers!

>>6984205
Just to add more fuel to the fire here (That's not intended to any of you who are still going on about the candle wick....) I'm far from saying the teacher is right there (HAH!) but if he DID drop the coin out of the spacestation....... wouldn't it's orbit be in a state of decay anyway as with most of the junk that's floating around up there.... ergo it will eventually fall to earth..... eventually.... :) (Albeit we'll leave his 'hollow earth' theory over there with all the other hollow earth theories....... in that fire where they put all the spent candle wicks and other useless waste-of-time-and-breath-and-energy-talking-about-topics......)

>>6985391
>Most states require teachers to earn a graduate degree
Instead of most, do you mean some?

http://education-portal.com/articles/Do_You_Need_a_Masters_Degree_to_Teach_High_School.html

>>6985425
>http://education-portal.com/articles/Do_You_Need_a_Masters_Degree_to_Teach_High_School.html
Nice link. Are you a University of Phoenix grad?

>>6984780
Irreversible is an adjective, it has to be attached to something, it could be a process in thermodynamics that is irreversible because of energy transfer that cannot be returned. Therefore, it would be a chemical reaction because it is an irreversible chemical reaction. Irreversible describes anything that is irreversible.

>>6984780
>>6985446
Maybe I should have written, there are irreversible processes that are not chemical reactions, there are irreversible physical changes

>>6984813
I didn't catch all of them then, my mistake, it was getting annoying reading it all

>>6984835
Lol lets go to conferences to better learn how to be a babysitter, my mom never went to any of those things, she's highly regarded as a teacher

>>6985458
A lot of them are learning the latest technology somebody thinks will save teachers from themselves.

>>6985458
>she's highly regarded as a teacher
>babysitter

>>6985428
Is that where you got your teacher's certification?

Do post links of your own.

>>6985466
Did you even look at the site that hosts that link? It's a for-profit, bullshit, internet college.

You are going to have to look at all the various state ed sites to find the requirements.

>This site is probably not much better, but they have direct links to all the state sites.
http://mastersineducationguide.com/teacher-certification-requirements-by-state/

>>6985477
Just a sampling of links shows many are broken, but that site did have this page:

http://mastersineducationguide.com/why-do-i-need-a-masters-in-education-degree/

>Only a very few states (Massachusetts and New York) require the completion of a Master’s degree in Education to receive a professional license or tenure.

>>6985407
north carolina. he had a master's in library science and a teaching certification that would have let him be a librarian. the school desperately needed someone to teach computer classes, but he wasn't certified to teach computer courses, so he had to turn the job down.

they wanted to give him a job, he wanted the job, but he didn't have the cert (which you need minimum several semesters of courses and a semester or two of hands-on teaching experience to get), so no go. had nothing to do with him presenting himself.

>>6984716
lolwut

Mixing a drink can be an example of a chemical reaction. We add lemon juice to baileys to make a cock-sucking cowboy, and the cream curdles. Then, later. The slut throws up in your lap.

>>6984575
We use miles in bongland, always use km in physics.

Any chemical reactions and phenomenons are basically physical reaction at atomic level, retards.
>chemfags got BTFO

>>6984205
Quite frankly you are a faggot. You missed the entire lesson and hence why you're probably not where you thought you would be.
You're not smart, you're dense/autistic. I hate people like to act like they know what they are talking about but your teacher can probably school you.
All he meant was that if the Earth had a hole that went like diametrically, you could drop an object and it would oscillate and if this was done from a satellite it would have the same period. That's actually factual, however it isn't what would happen in the real world.

Music teacher. Played classical records. Never taught us to read music. Fucker.

>>6984205
>>high school physics teacher
What are your degrees?

>>6984262
>>6984755
OP's post had nothing to do with inverse square laws or gravity.

>>6985113
Fuck Nikki Haley. She destroyed the SC teaching environment. At least in my district.