/sci/ - Science & Math

Probably shitty sandstone.

>>6958122
your syntactical structure was so bad that without the first comment, I wouldve literally struggled to comprehend what the fuck you were saying

>>6958137
Just answer the question you pompous faggot

>>6958122
I would guess its a turbidite and mud is getting eroded out

>>6958122

I don't know, go correlate the eroded strata at another location you fucking turd and fine out

>>6958162
Ask the question in a way that makes sense, fucking tard

>>6958122
probably veins of a harder mineral that was formed from water in a crack, possibly gypsum.

>>6958137
>wouldve
would ' ve

>literally
pls stop

>>6958322
But it's on Mars...

>>6958485
But they wouldn't erode out

>>6958525
Then why do I see liquid water!?

Shopped!

>>6958137
In case you're not a native speaker, I can understand why you would have some trouble parsing that sentence.

>What are these layers that erode out made of
This is the main part of the question. It is colloquially correct and comprehensible.

>>6958512
>pls

Please

>>6960098

I see no liquid water. It's all sand.

Probably best to try and find a rock that behaves a similar way on Earth. You could try hoping that Curiosity will give it a drill, but I'm not sure they would be able to reliably do it on such a flaky-looking rock.

>>6961630
>liquid water

>>6960120
It is comprehensible, however it is nonetheless poor phrasing; I'm a native English speaker and I had to read it twice.

>What do you think these eroded layers were made of?

See? Not difficult.

>>6958122
Wat

>>6958130
Likely this, or some sort of other shitty sedimentary conglomerate.

>>6958122
dat crossbeding

>>6958137
>>no capitalization
>>incorrect grammar
>>no period

Can someone please translate this post? I'm not a native English speaker

>>6958137

Yea we'll your a idiot

>>6963931
>we'll