/sci/ - Science & Math

So you're saying mathfags are cuckolds?

>>6948711
basically yes.

>>6948708
I don't agree. I love math yet I'm an engineering major.

>>6948842
In what are you majoring?

>>6948848
EE

>>6948842
>>6948848
And from what I've seen we've raped math in the Statistical Mechanics class more than any engineering course I've taken.

>>6948851
energetic, electrical or electronic?

>>6948865
Electrical and Electronics

>>6948875
I'm doing energetic :)
do you think I should specialize in nuclear energy, renewable sources or in industrial systems?

>>6948889
How should I be able to answer that well while still in undergrad?

No doesn't mean no when it comes to math. She could just be being undecidable.

>>6948889
need for affection?

>>6948903
you said you were in major

>>6948708
>picture is of a prime example of mathematics brought to life by engineering

We learn by trial and error, not by math. Math is a shortcut the weak use to explain problems you can't figure out on your own.

I'm a geology major and all the math used in geology amounts to jack shit. It's trial and error that lets us figure out how groundwater flows. It's trial and error that lets us figure out about subsurface layers of rock. It's trial and error that lets us learn the relationships of long dead species. At best math helps us develop tools. Math is just our bitch.

Math majors put themselves on a pedestal they don't belong on.

>>6948708
No:

Mathematicians love math
Physicists rape it
Engineers use it.

Just look at perturbation theory and QFT if you want to see molested math.

>>6948960
how exactly does trial and error come into play in order to figure relationships of long dead species out?

>>6948960
>implying you couldn't model these systems

>>6948988
>implying model isn't based on trial and error

>>6948963
You may have a point there...

>>6948963
just look at -1/12

Physicists love maths too. The good ones do, at least.

>>6948960
implying physics, and all forms of engineering arent rooted in math. just because geology doesn't use it doesn't mean its not useful.

>>6948960
>geology

>>>/out/

>>6948960
Trial and error is a shorcut for the weak.

>>6948963
Physicists don't rape it. Math is into some kinky shit.

>>6948997
That's not from physics though. It's just used there. A mathematician did it first.

>>6949149
>Physicists don't rape it

... they sodomize it

>>6948708
I'm ME.

I have had sexual relations with math
She was asking for it.

>>6949158
Oh come on, that's a bit harsh.

All we do is slip roofies into math's drink and assume she'd have said yes anyway.

>>6948708
>Physicists use it
>Engineers rape it.

It's the other way around. Physicists are fucking retarded at math.

>>6949158
>they sodomize it
How else does one have sex with a dickgirl

pretty sure it's the engineers that use it and the physicists that fuck with it and cherrypick proofs and methods that work for their theories and ignore all the "rules"

engineers don't know enough about math to rape it anyway kek

>>6949167
u r a lil witty one arnt u

>>6949177
We don't ignore the rules you tart. We just don't meticulously make sure our system satisfies every condition that one theorem needs to be true, which is fine most of the time because a lot of physics deals within a very confined set of assumptions anyway (natura non facit saltum etc.)

And this is done out of convenience anyway (else your undergrad degree would take you several decades). When you develop a new theory you have to be just as rigorous as any mathematician.

>>6949191
You very clearly have NO knowledge of physics outside of undergrad

>>6949175
You let her sodomise you.

>>6949197
Yes, please tell me how graduate physics ignores the rules of maths.

>>6949191
>When you develop a new theory you have to be just as rigorous as any mathematician

Which is why QFT has no mathematical basis whatsoever... Oh wait

>>6949201
>please tell me how graduate physics ignores the rules of maths

Perturbation theory

>>6949180
math is kinky like that

>>6949209
And how does it ignore the rules?

>>6949222
>for lets expand 2/ℏ/∞ as an infinite series and ignore where it converges at all let alone to what we expanded
>drop all terms for "small values" of the constants 2/ℏ/∞
>oh look it worked, the math must be correct!