/sci/ - Science & Math

Yes, I can confirm that your virginity is abnormal and you should be ashamed of yourself.

>>6911628
Confirmed!

>>6911632
Afraid of the truth?
In that case:
The earth is flat, honey dw.
Air has mass, sweetie, it's ok. The big man with beard is lying.
Yes, the sun is a satellite circulating earth. Haha, what did the professor say? XD

>>6911628
I am a synapse can confirm

>>6911628
reference 3: only 5 male human brains examined

>>6911668
oh wait that's a different paper with a very similar title.

very much confirmed

>>6911664
pathetic

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131202161935.htm

>>6911672
>i r less pathetic den u :(
>that'll show him!

oh boy

I'm going to let you in on a little secret. The secret isn't women are dumber than men, everyone knows that. The secret is EVERYONE knows that, including women.

Women are innately aware that every man is smarter and more capable than them. That's why they play these shitty games all the time, because they know if they were to try to intellectually connect with a man or argue using logic and reason they would just get blown the fuck out.They want to keep up the illusion that they're smart or capable, like they're some sort of masterminds of manipulation, but really they're just doing stupid shit to confuse you long enough to avoid getting exposed from the fact that they have NO IDEA what they're doing or what they want.

If they played on an even ground with us they would just get manipulated, embarrassed, or exposed. Women KNOW that feminism is all bullshit, they KNOW that that society is biased against men, but they don't want US to know because once that illusion is broken woman will have NO POWER whatsoever.

Look at any society that hasn't given into feminist western culture bullshit, and you'll see that women have ZERO social status. This isn't because society is inherently sexist, it's because women are wholly incapable of doing anything except creating babies and when everything is truly equal they can't even compete. You think it's coincidence no functioning society has ever been run by a woman? It's because they're shit at everything.

And women KNOW it.

>>6911664
>Air has mass, sweetie


My autism force me to point out that you are indeed a faggot.

>>6911697

Now explain me why the sand-nigga aren't the rulers of the earth. and then kindly fuck off to your containnement board >>>/x/

ya op! i think girls are dumb to!!!!

>>6911628
This is the third time you've posted this fucking thread in a month.

You know who has smaller brains than men? Children. Why? Because children are fucking smaller than men. Do you know who has smaller organs than men? Children. Because children are fucking smaller than men.

Do you know who is also smaller than men? Women. Therefore women also have smaller organs, because they're fucking smaller than men. So of course their brains are smaller.

Brain size says nothing about it's function. Larger people will have larger brains, this does not make them smarter. Fuck off with your /pol/ tier garbage

>>6911742

Read the picture. It's nothing to do with body size.

>>6911628
>OP
>I'm a sad virgin, please respond to my lashing out with inflammatory and unfounded studies.

>>6911742
so what you're saying is that women are on the same level as male children?

>>6911784
Exactly. Just like how elephants are way smarter than us.

>>6911697
I'm going to let you in on a little secret. The secret isn't non-whites are dumber than whites, everyone knows that. The secret is EVERYONE knows that, including non-whites.

Non-whites are innately aware that every white is smarter and more capable than them. That's why they play these shitty games all the time, because they know if they were to try to intellectually connect with a white person or argue using logic and reason they would just get blown the fuck out.They want to keep up the illusion that they're smart or capable, like they're some sort of masterminds of manipulation, but really they're just doing stupid shit to confuse you long enough to avoid getting exposed from the fact that they have NO IDEA what they're doing or what they want.

If they played on an even ground with us they would just get manipulated, embarrassed, or exposed. Non-whites KNOW that equality is all bullshit, they KNOW that that society is biased against whites, but they don't want US to know because once that illusion is broken non-whites will have NO POWER whatsoever.

Look at any society that hasn't given into egalitarian western culture bullshit, and you'll see that non-whites have ZERO social status. This isn't because society is inherently racist, it's because non-whites are wholly incapable of doing anything except creating ghettos and when everything is truly equal they can't even compete. You think it's coincidence no functioning society has ever been run by a non-white? It's because they're shit at everything.

And non-whites KNOW it.

>>6911785
>>6911742

... The picture goes to the length of specifically noting that elephants have 8 billion FEWER 'neocortical neurons' and that 'body size had no influence on neuron number'... and you used total contradictions of those as your arguments (assuming both are you).

I know nothing about this, and the picture could be total bullshit... but Christ, learn to read.

>>6911784

The synapse design of the brain might not correlate with intelligence as much as we think. Something seems weird about these results.

I understand that this is an anonymous board, and I expect no one to believe me when I make the next statement, but if you believe this logic please explain why this is in the same vein. My fiance is a nuclear engineer, top of her class. The women in her family a generation ago were also nuclear engineers that worked on the atomic bomb during WW2. She is super intelligent and isn't socially awkward in the slightest. Was this study done on a large amount of females? I feel like the reason women aren't as successful as men is because of cultural pressure to be the one in the family that raises the child, not purely genetic design.

>>6911810
>literally not using science and using anecdotes

go to /lit/

>>6911814

Well you have me at it being an anecdote, but where in these studies does this point to a difference in intelligence?

>>6911814
Actually if you're going this way the single existence of a very very intelligent woman is against all statistical prevision
cause of all these sigmas and shit, normal law decreases pretty fast

>>6911814
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/38/14615.full

Well it turnouts these studies only analyse certain sections of the brain, women actually have a higher neural density than men in areas of verbal communication and overall we have similar amounts of neurons. Here is my source