/sci/ - Science & Math

Transcendental numbers...

take your meds

>>6836184
WHATS IN THE EMPTY BOX?!?!

>>6836186
This is not proving me wrong, its a problem existing in maths as in binary logic. Computers can approach those numbers better than humans with some math knowledge. Bu i know you did not try really hard so maybe next time.

>>6836187 Very well reasoned.

>>6836189
Space/2^n

>>6836189
1/64

>>6836189
<span class="math"> \displaystyle
63.\overline 9 ^{e^{i\pi}}
[/spoiler]

>>6836189
Schrodinger's cat

>>6836210

>>6836189
>EMPTY BOX
>>6836210
>Schrodinger's cat
Nope.

>>6836215
Go away with that shit.

>>6836227
Maybe the box isn't empty. It's a 50/50 game of luck.

>>6836245
Only if you am an 'esper' AMIRIGHT?

>>6836258
You kind of have to be an esper to win who wants to be a millionaire.

I mean, there's 33.34% chance of being right unless the person happens to know the right answer, and lifelines can only get you so far into the game.

Let's say there are 15 questions with 4 choices each. Let's also say there are 3 lifelines: call-a-friend, 50-50, and ask-the-audience.

For each of the 15 questions, there is only 1 correct answer, and 3 incorrect answers, so immediately your chances are 1/3 = 33.34%. You can use each lifeline once. Using phone-a-friend, let's say gives you a 95% chance the person you call is correct. So 1 question is 95%. Similarly, we can say ask-the-audience gives you a 95% chance. Finally, 50-50 will remove 2 wrong answers, so you have 1 right answer and 1 wrong answer, so you basically know the answer. To recap:

Question 1: 33.34%
Question 2: 33.34%
Question 3: 33.34%
Question 4: 95% <--- ask-the-audience
Question 5: 33.34%
Question 6: 33.34%
Question 7: 33.34%
Question 8: 33.34%
Question 9: 95% <--- phone-a-friend
Question 10: 33.34%
Question 11: 33.34%
Question 12: 33.34%
Question 13: 33.34%
Question 14: 33.34%
Question 15: 100% <--- 50-50
Total: 690.08%
Divided by 15 questions = 46.00%
So basically, it's more a less a game of chance, but more than half the people on the show will lose, so it's not very fair. That show is making tons of money off of people.

>>6836215
Thats so wrong it hurts

>>6836265
1 in 4 is 25% or 3\1

>>6836265
This post...
So much... Nonsense...

>>6836265
ayy lmao

>>6836184
I stopped caring about math when I was introduced to the concept of imaginary numbers. What a crock of shit. If your equation can only be solved by inventing numbers that can't exist, like some kind of math deity , then you are fucking wrong and the math is flawed. Same for algebra solutions that basically say "the correct answer is whatever the correct answer is". Thats what the math said transcribed to words but god forbid if i wrote in down in english instead of the ancient math runes the teacher word mark me wrong.

Math is logical and numbers never lie my ass. Math is just as flawed as any other human construct.

>>6836300
Because you do not understand it does not mean math is flawed.

>>6836300
>>6836265
This is some classic pasta right here.

>>6836184
your argument is invalid.
>mathematics is just a set of combined binary logic
math algebra is absolutely not boolean algebra.
only computers use binary computation which reminds me WE ARE HUMANS(we don't make things complicated).
any conversion of decimal and binaries are just utilization for digital programming.
we can't compare calculus and discrete mathematics such that both laws are meant for different purpose and are both true.there are no dissonance between any discipline unless you're justifying that one is part of another.

>>6836399
>unless you're justifying that one is part of another.

Why? Still don't see any problem with that.

>>6836399
I just reread this post and your stupidness and ignorance is great on this one.