/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6612801
It just means you dont entirely understand all the strategies the book is using to get the answer, since there are a lot of them and can be used in any order.

Algebra in a nutshell

>>6612801
>solving problems by pattern matching to other worked out ones

Biggest retards in math courses. Physics will gladly welcome you.

Depends what you mean by complex.
If you can prove new thing when you have an idea of a similar proof, then that shows you understand the theory, but are not fully familiar with it yet.
If it is something computational, like calculating a derivative, integral, differential equation etc. then I do think it's a bad sign. Those sort of problems are very easy if you have an example showing you how to go about it, so being able to solve it with the book open means you are more or less just copying from the book.

>>6612801
Yes, it's bad. Were you expecting us to tell you otherwise?

>>6612947
>posting pictures that imply a two-sided limit exists when it doesn't

>>>/calc1/