/sci/ - Science & Math

this would never be allowed in America.

>>6488263
I think it's fine. Yes, we can do asexual reproduction like that (=cloning).

>>6488263
>If I'm a wealthy man I can have a surrogate carry my child, and then raise it entirely on my own.
this is possible without this technology.

>>6488464

Oh no, artificial insemination devices are technology.

>>6488263
>I can take my own egg
>get sperm from my body
hmmm

Everybody prepared for the Race War.
Nobody expected the Gender War.


Joking aside, just need artificial wombs and we can finally get rid of females.

>>6488263
So, how long until we'll treat eugenics and GMOs in the same way?
Once being human had a meaning.

>>6488517
>staying meat-based

>>6488504
Or females can get rid of males with cloning.

>>6488517
People already do. We already experiment with genetic engineering on humans.

>>6488521
Flesh beats cold metal. Enjoy you inability to replicate.

>>6488929
>implying

>>6488932
Yes, but the feed stock requires manufacturing itself.

>>6488504
>finally get rid of females

>>6488929
>oh look, the meat is 'reasoning' again. how quaint, and yet disturbing really.

>>6488464
>Mating with someone so genetically similar to you that they're literally you.

From a genetic standpoint, isn't this worse than any type of incest?

>>6488436
so just do it in a different country?
>>6488504
I think it'd be great if you could have a kid without needed an opposite sex partner.

This would also be an option for people who are infertitle for whatever reason.

I mean, when the article says
"we can do it with mice"
Hoe far away is the process to being done with humans?
If a super duper rich person wanted to do it, could they?

>>6488945
?
it'd be a clones essentially, this is just the way you're going about it.
Also, wouldn't there be enough genetic diversity for it to not be a major problem?

Especially if you're using it in a more "traditional" aspect (two same sex parents, infertile parents, etc)

>>6488504
>we can finally get rid of females.
It would be much better to get rid of males than females.

>>6489180
why so?

>>6489180
>>6489904

>>6489180
Nothing would get done. Ever see women build anything?

>>6489915
>Daily Mail

>>6489915
There would be less conflict without males. I mean our knuckles are evolutionarily made for fighting. (Women have them too but that's an outlier. They're not the ones who were designated by evolution to literally "bring home the bacon.")
>>6489924
But then this chap also has a point. Women were given a chance to prove they are mentally identical to males. They were given a chance to go into STEM fields en masse. Have they?

>>6489915
hahaha, I just looked this chick up. She's hillarious.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2124246/Samantha-Brick-downsides-looking-pretty-Why-women-hate-beautiful.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2325837/Samantha-Brick-spent-25-000-fortune-tellers-dumping-friends-husband-say-psychics.html
The article from that picture
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

There's a bunch of others too. Seems Daily Mail sees her as an unwitting lulzcow.

>>6489954
To be fair, there's always been a decent amount of women in Mathematics. I think they just avoid the rest of STEM because it's full of neckbeards and creeps who hate women. I'm not even a woman and that shit's obvious to me.

>>6489959
Everyone over 18 is either a neckbeard or a legbeard(crotchbeard?) like you.

The difference is, neckbeards go to learn something profitable. Legbeards go for their Mrs. degree, which is also profitable.

>>6489959
excuses excuses

The evidence that men and women have very different brains, down to their very cores, is mounting daily. This has nothing to do with misogyny and everything to do with reality.

>>6489134
it would probably not be allowed on humans for ethical reasons.
So we need to wait for China to get good with this technology.

>>6488932
anon, that's l-lewd ^_^;

>>6490000
honestly, I would like to use this method to have some kids, and I'm wondering how rich I'm gonna have to be in order for this to be possible.

>>6488497
every device is technology, you nigger faggot.
>>6488436
who the fuck gives a shit about america you nigger faggot?