[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 53 KB, 960x717, inb4 ban.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6453970 No.6453970[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Fuck it, i'm risking the ban.

I can't find my C for the life of me. What exactly am i doing wrong? trigonometric identities always make me their bitch. I've solved for everything but the x of the original function


It's the second problem by the way.

>> No.6453981

pls

>> No.6453985

What the FUCK are you trying to do

>> No.6453986

>>6453985

set the original function equal to 4 to find the x value aka C

>> No.6454008

are all of you fucking retarded. when you're given limits of integration, you're solving a definite integral. THERE IS NO C VALUE IN A DEFINITE INTEGRAL.

>> No.6454023

>>6453970
dozens of other HW forums on the web, you're shitposting on /sci/.

fuck off.

>> No.6454021

>Going horizontal and not vertical
Good luck, retard.

>> No.6454035

>>6454008

mean value theorem

>> No.6454045

>>6453970

I don't even know what you are doing...not only do you fail at steroids but you fail at science

>> No.6454062

>>6454045

the above problem is the same thing, just a different function and interval

>> No.6454103

>>6454062
>>6454035
If you cant figure it out based on a google search for mean value theorem, you deserve to be banned and fail

>> No.6454107

>Calculus I

Into the trash it goes

>> No.6454112

>>6454103
At this point, that's not even the problem anymore. He's asking how to solve 4=pi*sec^2(x) for x.

>> No.6454117

>>6454112

i know, it's bad

>> No.6454142
File: 86 KB, 576x1706, 1396401162011.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6454142

>>6454117
>4=pi*sec^2(x)
alright op, here you go, sorry for caps lock yelling at you before:

>> No.6454143
File: 1.32 MB, 254x198, 1379785049890.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6454143

>>6454112
arcsec(2/sqrt(pi)) = x

>> No.6454163

>>6454143

oh god thank you. I knew what my answer was in decimal form but i couldn't for the life of me put it in a proper notation. I'm an idiot.

>>6454142

thanks but that's just a step-by-step of what wolfram did, and that's not a proper notation for the answer.

>> No.6454176

>>6454163
How is >>6454143
a better answer than >>6454142
And why couldn't you do either to begin with? Especially >>6454143 since it is the most direct way? Do you not know about inverse trig functions at all? Since no trig identities were actually used.
>trigonometric identities always make me their bitch.

>> No.6454231

>>6454176

my brain has been a potato for the past 5 hours so i just said whatever is anywhere close to trig functions and shit.

i just totally forgot about finding the inverse to simplify

>> No.6454364

>>6454231
thas why its imporan to visit /b/ every once in awhile to let the potato out of the bag.