[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 43 KB, 384x336, 1366243056351.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6077010 No.6077010[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

thought id share a story
Backstory: me and lemonfont were talking about the universe and shit and i shared the story with soemone else then it all went downhill
sorry in advance for the spelling

[10/7/2013 6:58:56 PM] fefe: lol
[10/7/2013 6:58:59 PM] fefe: silly you
[10/7/2013 6:59:12 PM] Harry S Plinkett: i are smart
[10/7/2013 6:59:27 PM] fefe: finite and infinite are human concepts
[10/7/2013 6:59:45 PM] fefe: our mind designed to "traduce" the universe and everything in it
[10/7/2013 6:59:51 PM] fefe: as everything human amde
[10/7/2013 6:59:54 PM] fefe: it has a limit
[10/7/2013 7:00:01 PM] fefe: it doesnt really represent nature
[10/7/2013 7:01:07 PM] Harry S Plinkett: the only thing that is truly infinate that i can think of is the distance an undisturbed object can travel
[10/7/2013 7:01:30 PM] fefe: is it?
[10/7/2013 7:01:48 PM] fefe: hehe
[10/7/2013 7:01:51 PM] Harry S Plinkett: im sure there are more
[10/7/2013 7:02:02 PM] Harry S Plinkett: but infinity is a mathmatical concept
[10/7/2013 7:02:29 PM] Harry S Plinkett: the universe is finite with the potentual to become infinate

1/?

>> No.6077014

Stop. We do not want to read it.

>> No.6077012

[10/7/2013 7:02:49 PM] fefe: all those things are unstable human concepts stablishe din a VERY unstable human hipothesis based on an even more unstable human logic
[10/7/2013 7:02:58 PM] fefe: dont think anything we know is true
[10/7/2013 7:03:03 PM] fefe: not even for other humans
[10/7/2013 7:03:18 PM] fefe: we cant even THINK of it being true for other stuff
[10/7/2013 7:03:21 PM] fefe: for instance
[10/7/2013 7:03:51 PM] fefe: like
[10/7/2013 7:03:55 PM] fefe: all we studied is based on the incredible small aprt of nature we can persive
[10/7/2013 7:04:02 PM] fefe: with our sences
[10/7/2013 7:04:23 PM] fefe: we may have 20 feet long penises we cant persive
[10/7/2013 7:04:26 PM] fefe: and we will never know
[10/7/2013 7:04:34 PM] Harry S Plinkett: the reason we can not imagine infinity is because the human mind tries to think of the end of infinity, which doesnt exist
[10/7/2013 7:04:52 PM] fefe: we are pathetic living forms, like anyone else, dont think we will ever understand this world
[10/7/2013 7:04:56 PM] fefe: or anything in it
[10/7/2013 7:05:00 PM] fefe: just enjoy it
[10/7/2013 7:05:22 PM] fefe: lol you dont get it
[10/7/2013 7:05:28 PM] fefe: we can think in infinite
[10/7/2013 7:05:30 PM] Harry S Plinkett: i think you are undermining human intelligence
[10/7/2013 7:05:35 PM] fefe: infinite is a human concept
[10/7/2013 7:05:39 PM] fefe: but its not real
[10/7/2013 7:06:14 PM] fefe: hehe humans are the most inteligent creatures we can perseve
[10/7/2013 7:06:25 PM] fefe: therefore is the one more aware of his ignorance
[10/7/2013 7:06:29 PM] fefe: ist it?
[10/7/2013 7:06:38 PM] fefe: a worm doesnt know he is stupid
[10/7/2013 7:06:48 PM] fefe: stupid humans doesnt know they are stupid
[10/7/2013 7:06:51 PM] Harry S Plinkett: a worm doesnt need to know its stupid

2/?

>> No.6077016

>>6077014
ok

>> No.6077017

>>6077014
>>6077016
Please continue. I want to read it.

>> No.6077023

>>6077017
Whoops forgot my name

>> No.6077022

[10/7/2013 7:06:56 PM] fefe: inteligent humans now they are stupid
[10/7/2013 7:07:23 PM] Harry S Plinkett: its hard to type philosophy and science when my other hand is jerking it to big breasted milfs
[10/7/2013 7:07:25 PM] fefe: tehrefore YOU undersestimate human inteligence
[10/7/2013 7:07:26 PM] fefe: not me
[10/7/2013 7:07:44 PM] fefe: lol
[10/7/2013 7:07:47 PM] fefe: charming
[10/7/2013 7:08:13 PM] Harry S Plinkett: youre delving too far into philosphy and the meaning of infinity
[10/7/2013 7:08:31 PM] Harry S Plinkett: if you looked at mathmatics youd understand the practicality and impracticality of infinity
[10/7/2013 7:08:42 PM] Harry S Plinkett: it really is a mathmatical concept that cant be applied to nature
[10/7/2013 7:08:52 PM] Harry S Plinkett: more for the mathmatical calculation of things
[10/7/2013 7:09:17 PM] fefe: lol
[10/7/2013 7:09:20 PM] fefe: it isnt
[10/7/2013 7:09:23 PM] Harry S Plinkett: when determinign the size of the universe you are measuring the radius, a mathmatical concept

3/?
I hate the word limit and skype is dildos

>> No.6077024
File: 43 KB, 231x363, HAHAHA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6077024

>>6077022
>its hard to type philosophy and science when my other hand is jerking it to big breasted milfs

>> No.6077026

[10/7/2013 7:09:36 PM] fefe: matematics is just a way taht works for humans of THIS spesifical period
[10/7/2013 7:09:46 PM] fefe: top TRADUCE what they can PERSEVE of nature
[10/7/2013 7:09:58 PM | Edited 7:10:01 PM] fefe: thats why it has flaws
[10/7/2013 7:10:09 PM] fefe: for example
[10/7/2013 7:10:22 PM] fefe: divide 1 in 3
[10/7/2013 7:10:25 PM] fefe: do the math
[10/7/2013 7:11:36 PM] Harry S Plinkett: you get 1/3
[10/7/2013 7:11:42 PM] Harry S Plinkett: a third of the original product
[10/7/2013 7:11:44 PM] Harry S Plinkett: i dont get it
[10/7/2013 7:11:47 PM] fefe: nono
[10/7/2013 7:11:51 PM] fefe: do the actual math
[10/7/2013 7:12:00 PM] fefe: ill help you
[10/7/2013 7:12:11 PM] fefe: its 0.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
[10/7/2013 7:12:13 PM] Harry S Plinkett: you take one
split it into three
you get one third
[10/7/2013 7:12:14 PM] fefe: to the infinite
[10/7/2013 7:12:17 PM] fefe: or periodic
[10/7/2013 7:12:24 PM] fefe: right?
[10/7/2013 7:12:28 PM] Harry S Plinkett: you see thats where youre wrong
[10/7/2013 7:12:36 PM] Harry S Plinkett: math has many different ways of doign a single problem
[10/7/2013 7:12:44 PM] fefe: exactly
[10/7/2013 7:12:46 PM] Harry S Plinkett: and the problem is that people think it all has to be done the same way

4/?
>refering to humans in the third person

>> No.6077030

[10/7/2013 7:12:48 PM] fefe: and thats because its human
[10/7/2013 7:12:56 PM] fefe: and doenst really aplies to everything
[10/7/2013 7:12:59 PM] fefe: so it has changes
[10/7/2013 7:13:01 PM] fefe: rules
[10/7/2013 7:13:06 PM] fefe: and rulas that null those rules
[10/7/2013 7:13:11 PM] fefe: coz its human
[10/7/2013 7:13:15 PM | Edited 7:13:19 PM] fefe: and has flaws
[10/7/2013 7:13:39 PM] fefe: hehe you just got me where i was going
[10/7/2013 7:13:53 PM] fefe: just know nothing we know is actually true
[10/7/2013 7:14:05 PM] fefe: its just how we decided to understand it now
[10/7/2013 7:14:12 PM] fefe: even languaje
[10/7/2013 7:14:22 PM] fefe: makes our thinking very small
[10/7/2013 7:14:29 PM] fefe: try thinking without languaje
[10/7/2013 7:14:32 PM] fefe: you cant
[10/7/2013 7:14:44 PM] fefe: think about soemthing you cnat describe with words
[10/7/2013 7:14:54 PM] fefe: you cant
[10/7/2013 7:14:58 PM] Harry S Plinkett: what the fuck are you even talkign about anymore
[10/7/2013 7:14:59 PM] fefe: no one can
[10/7/2013 7:15:04 PM] fefe: hehe

5/?
>hehe

>> No.6077033

[10/7/2013 7:15:08 PM] Harry S Plinkett: you can think without language
[10/7/2013 7:15:19 PM] fefe: oh really?
[10/7/2013 7:15:30 PM] Harry S Plinkett: its called thinking about like rivers n shit
[10/7/2013 7:15:39 PM] Harry S Plinkett: landscape isnt a language
[10/7/2013 7:15:40 PM] fefe: rivers is a thing
[10/7/2013 7:15:46 PM] fefe: of course it is
[10/7/2013 7:15:47 PM] fefe: haha
[10/7/2013 7:15:52 PM] Harry S Plinkett: but it can be thought
[10/7/2013 7:15:53 PM] fefe: its called landscape
[10/7/2013 7:16:00 PM] Harry S Plinkett: you can think about rivers
[10/7/2013 7:16:13 PM] fefe: yep
[10/7/2013 7:16:14 PM] Harry S Plinkett: [Monday, October 07, 2013 7:14 PM] fefe:

<<< try thinking without languaje
[10/7/2013 7:16:18 PM] Harry S Plinkett: im thinking about a river
[10/7/2013 7:16:28 PM] fefe: ok
[10/7/2013 7:16:30 PM] fefe: now
[10/7/2013 7:16:33 PM] fefe: river
[10/7/2013 7:16:36 PM] fefe: is a word
[10/7/2013 7:16:40 PM] fefe: of our languaje
[10/7/2013 7:16:43 PM] fefe: you cant think
[10/7/2013 7:16:45 PM] fefe: outside it

6/?
What the literal fuck

>> No.6077034

> That terrible spelling and grammar from both parties. Just go back to primary school before discussing Science.

>> No.6077037

[10/7/2013 7:16:50 PM] Harry S Plinkett: well
[10/7/2013 7:16:51 PM] Harry S Plinkett: i can
[10/7/2013 7:16:54 PM] fefe: that is a barrier
[10/7/2013 7:17:01 PM] fefe: that reduces our thoughts
[10/7/2013 7:17:02 PM] Harry S Plinkett: but i cant tell you about it on a primarily text based program
[10/7/2013 7:17:15 PM] fefe: but you can to yourself?
[10/7/2013 7:17:17 PM] fefe: try
[10/7/2013 7:17:20 PM] fefe: you wont be able
[10/7/2013 7:17:30 PM] Harry S Plinkett: if we were face to face i can convey a river without words
[10/7/2013 7:18:13 PM] fefe: of cours esilly
[10/7/2013 7:18:19 PM] fefe: but its still the concept of river
[10/7/2013 7:18:24 PM] Harry S Plinkett: yes
[10/7/2013 7:18:28 PM] Harry S Plinkett: but im not using language
[10/7/2013 7:18:36 PM] fefe: i cnat explain you this in skype and in another languaje XD
[10/7/2013 7:18:48 PM] Harry S Plinkett: oh my god you are really starting to piss me off
[10/7/2013 7:18:48 PM] fefe: lent spanish, come here and ill explain it better
[10/7/2013 7:18:51 PM] fefe: hehe
[10/7/2013 7:18:55 PM] fefe: just finish your fap
[10/7/2013 7:18:55 PM] Harry S Plinkett: heres the basis what youre saying
[10/7/2013 7:18:58 PM] Harry S Plinkett: im done
[10/7/2013 7:19:41 PM] Harry S Plinkett: 1. humans are dumbd because they cant explain something to another human without language, which is the art of converying images and emotions
[10/7/2013 7:19:57 PM] fefe: no
[10/7/2013 7:20:00 PM] fefe: thats not what i said
[10/7/2013 7:20:02 PM] fefe: haha

7/?

>> No.6077039

[10/7/2013 7:20:06 PM] Harry S Plinkett: 2. humans are dumb because they have a theory of infinity
[10/7/2013 7:20:13 PM] fefe: i said they cant even THINK outside languaje
[10/7/2013 7:20:31 PM] Harry S Plinkett: what the fuck does that even MEEEAAANNNN
[10/7/2013 7:20:32 PM] fefe: lol NO
[10/7/2013 7:20:34 PM] fefe: XD
[10/7/2013 7:20:37 PM] Harry S Plinkett: ad stop saying they
[10/7/2013 7:20:38 PM] fefe: you dont get it
[10/7/2013 7:20:42 PM] fefe: dont worry
[10/7/2013 7:20:53 PM] fefe: not that you will need this in your life anyway XD
[10/7/2013 7:20:56 PM] Harry S Plinkett: when you say they you convey that you arent human and therefore above us
[10/7/2013 7:21:00 PM] fefe: thats the beawty of philosophy
[10/7/2013 7:21:14 PM] fefe: totally useless, just give syou pleasure
[10/7/2013 7:21:57 PM] Harry S Plinkett: youre not making a single lick of sence
[10/7/2013 7:22:21 PM] fefe: no
[10/7/2013 7:22:22 PM] Harry S Plinkett: youre saying humans are dumb because they cant comprehend things that might possibly not exist in the future
[10/7/2013 7:22:31 PM] fefe: you just need to know a little more about it
[10/7/2013 7:22:39 PM] fefe: or my english is worst than i thought
[10/7/2013 7:22:40 PM] Harry S Plinkett: but wouldnt future humans be equally dumb because future future humans are smarter?
[10/7/2013 7:22:41 PM] fefe: dont worry
[10/7/2013 7:22:51 PM] fefe: studie it if you ever feel like it
[10/7/2013 7:22:54 PM] Harry S Plinkett: i want you to summarise your arguement
[10/7/2013 7:22:58 PM] Harry S Plinkett: right now

8/?
>my english is bad
The classic excuse

>> No.6077044

[10/7/2013 7:23:00 PM] fefe: ok
[10/7/2013 7:23:04 PM] fefe: basically i said
[10/7/2013 7:23:21 PM] fefe: all we know is just a human convention, is not true
[10/7/2013 7:23:42 PM] fefe: all we do has his flaws as human has flaws therefore cant create flawless stuff
[10/7/2013 7:23:44 PM] fefe: and
[10/7/2013 7:23:57 PM] fefe: manguaje makes our thinking, we cant think without languaje
[10/7/2013 7:24:00 PM] fefe: taht was all
[10/7/2013 7:24:01 PM] fefe: i said
[10/7/2013 7:24:13 PM] Harry S Plinkett: and i say
[10/7/2013 7:24:42 PM] Harry S Plinkett: 1. how can you say it is not true. you are makign a human assumption, as by your reasoning is not true. therefore humans are right?
[10/7/2013 7:24:59 PM] Harry S Plinkett: 2. flawed concepts are constantly beign refined
[10/7/2013 7:25:32 PM] Harry S Plinkett: 3. you can think without language, you cannot convey your thoughts without it. language is the ability to convey thought to another person
[10/7/2013 7:26:46 PM] Harry S Plinkett: is my reasoning so wrong?
[10/7/2013 7:28:56 PM] Harry S Plinkett: ?

9/10

>> No.6077050

[10/7/2013 7:30:00 PM] fefe: yes
[10/7/2013 7:30:06 PM] fefe: its wrong
[10/7/2013 7:30:09 PM] fefe: as its human
[10/7/2013 7:30:17 PM] fefe: therefore mine is too
[10/7/2013 7:30:21 PM] Harry S Plinkett: but sitn that a human assumption you are making
[10/7/2013 7:30:31 PM] fefe: thast the big paradox of modern philosophy
[10/7/2013 7:30:54 PM] Harry S Plinkett: or youre possibly causing an uneeded paradox
[10/7/2013 7:31:11 PM] Harry S Plinkett: we are looking at thigns from a human perspective
[10/7/2013 7:31:48 PM] Harry S Plinkett: we need not worry about looking at things from another perspective because its doesnt mean a thing to us
[10/7/2013 7:32:00 PM] Harry S Plinkett: after all two men looking at a rocket taking off
[10/7/2013 7:32:08 PM] Harry S Plinkett: one is close the other is farther away
[10/7/2013 7:32:15 PM] Harry S Plinkett: it looks slower to one then the other
[10/7/2013 7:32:24 PM] Harry S Plinkett: why would one be right and the other wrong
[10/7/2013 7:32:35 PM] Harry S Plinkett: none of them are wrong
[10/7/2013 7:32:42 PM] Harry S Plinkett: tis all perspective

10/10
He hasent talked to me sence rest in piss good riddence asslord.
>boo hoo humans are dumb
>but not me im above human intelligence
>only banksey understands me

>> No.6077052

>I actually read through all that

In fairness fefe you actually seem pretty intelligent apposed to Plinket but why in the fuck did you feel the need to post all of this?

We get it, Plinket was to dumb to understand you, do you want a medal?

>> No.6077057
File: 12 KB, 173x252, 45395_45276.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6077057

>>6077052
im...um...
plinkett

>> No.6077064

>>6077057
Well despite terrible language fefe is right and he does not consider himself above other people, you just seem to dumb to get that.

>> No.6077066

>>6077064
hes just a "hugher intelligence" pissbaby who thinks everyone is dumb for some reason and math is wrong.

>> No.6077070

>>6077052
I got the opposite impression. In fact I lost it when fefe said said "do the actual math" as if 1/3 could be further simplified.

>> No.6077079
File: 31 KB, 558x669, 1380848540026.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6077079

>>6077070
nonono
the ACTUAL math
*grunt huff puff* stupid humans

>> No.6077080

>>6077079
Is that pic him? That's how I imagine the average /sci/ poster.

>> No.6077086

>>6077080
no some fedorator. he looks 20 times worse.
It sucks because apprently he used to look like a qt trap. now his head is shaved and he has a beard yet still tried to be a cute innocent babbu.