/sci/ - Science & Math

can't remember that happening to me.
And logically, you can at best find out correlation on when people are free to use their phones.

Happens to me all the time.
I assume it's because the phone vibrates for half a second or so before it starts ringing and such.

>>5848039
my phone is on silent 100% of the time.

i seem to remember some article positing that the signal going to your phone is interpreted by the brain enough so that you form a sort of pavlovian connection between checking your phone and whatever your brain feels.

you know how your speakers bzz several times if your phone is next to them before it rings?

Well what happens when your phone gets a all, is it does not ring right away. When it detects a signal with it's code in it, first thing it does is drastically increase it's signal power, and send back a confirmation that it has received the signal. This process takes like 1/2 -1 second.

It may be possible your body recognizes this signal somehow, and over time Pavlovian response takes over. The signal is pretty strong when your phone is next to you, the initial signal it sends to confirm is stronger than while you are talking on the phone as well, it's like an electronic shout. Then the phone reduces signal power to a lowest efficient level.

>>5848053
it's definitely possible. oscillatory frequencies of RF-EMFs correspond to some of the oscillation frequencies recorded in neuronal tissue and could interfere with neuronal activity

>>5848068
neat. kind of explains two phenomena (speaker sound and possibly body recognition).

>>5848053
>>5848070
>>5848086
Go back to /x/.

>>5848114
No you go back to /bible/.
Lrn2science

>>5848128
>science
>It may be possible your body recognizes this signal somehow, and over time Pavlovian response takes over. The signal is pretty strong when your phone is next to you, the initial signal it sends to confirm is stronger than while you are talking on the phone as well, it's like an electronic shout. Then the phone reduces signal power to a lowest efficient level.

>>5848114
go read the countless papers on it if you want.
hint: pubmed
retard.

>>5848151
>I'M RIGHT OKAY GO LOOK IT UP HINT GOOGLE IT HELLLOOOO?
>>>/x/

ascertainment bias

>>5848159

>>5848150
>Thinks he's scientific
>Dismissing theories offhandedly without any kind of counter evidence or even a better theory
No, that's called religion

>>5848199
Not the guy you are replying to but:
>What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof

Ever heard of Russell's teapot?

>>5848208
It's not an assertion, you fool. It's a hypothesis.
Jesus, why are so many people on /sci/ completely ignorant of how science works?

>>5848214
A hypothesis, without any evidence, is just an assertion about why something might be the case.

>>5848218
Assertion:
1. A confident and forceful statement of fact or belief: "his assertion that his father had deserted the family".

Hypothesis:
1. A supposition or proposed explanation m>>5848218
ade on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.

Conclusion: No. You are wrong and you should feel bad.

>>5848222
>on the basis of limited evidence
A hypothesis requires (some) evidence. Until you produce any it remains just some bullshit idea you made up

>>5848225
Limited does not imply existence.
Besides, that was only the first definition, the second fits far better.
2. A proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth.

Has there been any research on why every time I drive into a narrow tunnel I meet like 50 wide trailers, but as soon as I get out of the tunnel there are no trailers?

>>5848234
Yes.
They disappear for the same reason dryers eat socks.

holy shit, are you autists really jerking your own egos this hard over nothing.

Right like the one guy said, I simply stated that the cellular frequency might induce a pavlonian response by detection of the body. I never even stated that it is direct detection, nor that it actually occurs. We already for a fact know that the body responds to cellular stimuli when it's placed next to a speaker. maybe there are other less obvious sources of stimuli that might be affected by it as well.

>>5848199
"The moon is made of cheese."
"No it isn't you dumb fuck"
"LOL YOU IDIOT RELIGION IS LIKE THAT JUST REFUSING EVERYTHING HAHA YOU HAVE NO PROOF"
>>>/x/

>>5848232
how can something be "limited" if it doesn't even exist?

Going by your second statement, almost anything could qualify. I could just as easily say it is because the cellphone network is controlled by telepathic aliens who instil the subconscious desire to look at your phone in you just before they send you a message. And by your own logic, that could not be dismissed offhand.

>>5848244
Maybe that's how quantum healing works, along with placing magnets over your spine and ringing triangles and bells so their waves are in sync with your brain frequency.

>>5848245
this guy has a point, this whole thread would be better fit in /x/