[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 434 KB, 640x960, My-Life-My-Rules-Love-me-or-reject-me-I-dont-care.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5821997 No.5821997[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Who or what do you defer to for philosophical and psychology guidance and supposition?

Your haphazard internet search impulses and whatever the most popular google result reassures you of, as long as it has some nice website design?

That is, your subconscious drive running off shitty television culture, and your friends, basically.

I tend to go for Wikipedia. I love it's anthropological bend. I also defer to the teachings of certain reputable MODERN people, like Chomsky and Dennet.

I'm still looking for some guidance from a person or source with expertise in theoretical physics. Most of them seem like retards who can't into hereustics, parsimony and noon-reductive multi-scale analysis.

Let's get a discussion going, eh? Anyone interested?

>> No.5822047
File: 174 KB, 1100x478, 020709[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5822047

Anything in modern theoretical physics that isn't a proper mathematical explanation with assumed knowledge of quantum field theory is just an extremely vague analogy that is probably so vague that it has nothing to do with the subject.

I'm not trying to put you down, but this stuff isn't as easy to learn as you might think it is. You have to buy some books and learn it yourself.

>> No.5822056

>>5822047
Feels good to mathematics. Nobody asks you retarded questions that you know you cannot explain to them in less than a year.

They already know they won't understand shit when the first number appears.

>> No.5822071

>>5822056
1/10

>> No.5822076

>>5822071
2.4/10

>> No.5822078

>>5822076
i/10

>> No.5822147

>>5822078

1+i/10